Despite the fact Dunn implies I'm mafia here, even he says my reads are oddly accurate this game, so much that he thinks I could be scum who hard pushed for both of his partner's lynches seemingly for no reason.In post 5558, Dunnstral wrote:Zach is normally completely (like 90%) wrong on who is scum so it's weird that they've been falling left and right - heavy bussing suspected
I've been saying AGar town since way before there was any talk of claims. He was my townread Day 1 LMAOOOOTranscend wrote:But like how come you assumed AGar was solid town after
1. He claimed VT.
2. I claimed there was motion on him as a reaction test.
Boem_u_dusi wrote:Why can't you be town who has a wrong townread?In post 5695, Zachstralkita wrote:From AGar's play alone I would say he is town without a doubt, same thing I said with WakeIn post 5693, Boem_u_dusi wrote:Zach, why are you opposed to AGar lynch so much?
It makes senseTranscend wrote:got a case dude? i think in terms of rollercoaster reads, he would be mine.
i've scumread him one day then townread him the next and bla bla bla.
Boem_u_dusi wrote:Zach, why are you opposed to AGar lynch so much?If you think there's scum in me/AGar you shouldn't ever be asking me this question
You said we should shoot/lynch in Zach/AGar.
That means you believe one of us is scum.
If both of us are not scum then your statement is false in the first place and you shouldn't be questioning this.
Yeah all those claims are solid, that's why you're scum.Boem_u_dusi wrote:You, AGar, shannon, kraska also claimed VT.In post 5691, Zachstralkita wrote:Of all the people who claimed VT Boem is the only one who could reasonably be scum.
LOLBoem_u_dusi wrote:I have no idea. Let's lynch/shoot in AGar/Zach and call it a day, I guess.