Page 24 of 33
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 8:04 pm
by Grimgroove
If you read my posts, you know very well what caused my attention to be put on you. There's nothing "biassed" about it.
Can't we just lynch him? This game is dragging on and nothing new has been presented.
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 8:10 pm
by Nobody Special
Votecount 2.05
(unchanged)
L-1
Cheery Dog - 3 - fferyllt, Grimgroove, JasonWazza
Not Voting: TheIrishPope, TheTrollie, Cheery Dog, Lynx_Shine
With 7 it takes 4 to lynch
Deadline is in
(expired on 2013-07-29 19:50:21)
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 8:11 pm
by Cheery Dog
In post 575, Grimgroove wrote:If you read my posts, you know very well what caused my attention to be put on you. There's nothing "biassed" about it.
Can't we just lynch him? This game is dragging on and nothing new has been presented.
When I have no idea why this is actually scummy, or knowledge of this apparent "plan" I had, then yes your whole thing is bias.
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 8:15 pm
by JasonWazza
We are waiting on TheIrishPope to do shit.
P-Edit:
Cheery Dog wrote: In post 575, Grimgroove wrote:If you read my posts, you know very well what caused my attention to be put on you. There's nothing "biassed" about it.
Can't we just lynch him? This game is dragging on and nothing new has been presented.
When I have no idea why this is actually scummy, or knowledge of this apparent "plan" I had, then yes your whole thing is bias.
Yeah but you haven't even properly addressed it other then calling it biased (which is a piss poor defense), and not scumhunted AT ALL.
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 8:20 pm
by Cheery Dog
VOTE: jasonwazz
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 8:33 pm
by Cheery Dog
I guess I better also give some reasons for doing that (besides wanting to rage at shit), as I'm not entirely sure Jason is scum or not, but he's just provoking me into doing that by not going into more details of which parts of Grimm's confirmation bias case he is actually sheeping.
From what I understand of Grim's actual case(s) is that he found something which is apparently textbook distancing (and who the fuck uses textbooks nowadays?)
and is then finding evidence to back it up re: what I'm currently talking to him about.
Yes this game is still got crap out with the Kues/TIP slot needing a lot more content posted and with people like Trollie fluffing a majority of the time, I'm not convinced of my reads at all and haven't been all game besides when Sikon became obvtown.
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 8:37 pm
by Grimgroove
When did Sikon become obvtown to you?
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 8:40 pm
by JasonWazza
In post 580, Cheery Dog wrote:I guess I better also give some reasons for doing that (besides wanting to rage at shit),
as I'm not entirely sure Jason is scum or not
, but he's just provoking me into doing that by not going into more details of which parts of Grimm's confirmation bias case he is actually sheeping.
From what I understand of Grim's actual case(s) is that he found something which is apparently textbook distancing (and who the fuck uses textbooks nowadays?)
and is then finding evidence to back it up re: what I'm currently talking to him about.
Yes this game is still got crap out with the Kues/TIP slot needing a lot more content posted and with people like Trollie fluffing a majority of the time, I'm not convinced of my reads at all and haven't been all game besides when Sikon became obvtown.
Bold = not scumhunting, and not to mention not town motivated.
TIP you have all my permission to lynch this when you read, just give out reads before you lynch this.
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 8:57 pm
by Cheery Dog
After #267 (the rage post)
I was actually going to post directly afterwards, but I didn't have enough credit of my phone to actually post, and therefore it had to wait until I got home again.
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 8:58 pm
by Cheery Dog
You're not townmotivated.
Now fricken stop provoking me into getting mad and actually answer my
FUCKING QUESTION
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 9:35 pm
by Cheery Dog
Also while you at it, explain how how me rage voting you has any clear motivation whatsoever.
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:11 am
by TheIrishPope
Whow whow whow, why are we lynching CD? And did he claim? Up to page 14
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 5:10 am
by Grimgroove
Read on!
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:25 am
by fferyllt
This game is pretty badly stalled.
How is the catch-up coming along TIP?
Re this:
In post 566, Grimgroove wrote: In post 559, fferyllt wrote:
bauss and I had a very frank talk about our scumreads at the end of day 1. I took quite a bit of what he said on board. Lynx just accused me of sheeping him over it. The linkage is a mirage. Today's lynch has to be one of Cheery or me. I'm still on the fence about whether my flip today would do town more good than Cheery's, because your linkage theory is obscuring other players, one of whom is scum.
This makes so little sense I can't help but consider this an AtE. I can't see any reason why you would prefer a lynch on yourself over a lynch over someone you think is scum just because there is some possible confusion about how the two of you are aligned.
If the "mirage" is still there tomorrow, you can still deal with it then. Having yourself lynched as town now just for the sake of clarity is such a stretch I can hardly imagine this coming from town.
Though death wishes are generally bad in mafia, I'm somewhat prone to them when I foresee a strong chance that I could be a late-game mislynch. I've just come off a game where exactly that happened this weekend, and I could see it shaping up from fairly early on.
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:29 am
by TheIrishPope
Grimgroove complains over walls and then posts a wall
About 20 pages, getting there
My gut is screaming "don't lynch CD"
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:30 am
by fferyllt
In post 585, Cheery Dog wrote:Also while you at it, explain how how me rage voting you has any clear motivation whatsoever.
That was a rage vote? You have a very narrow reaction continuum.
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 12:56 pm
by Cheery Dog
I closed my tab directly after posting it to calm down, so maybe not that much rage, just getting fed up. (can't have been that bad when I was able to explain it slightly 10 minutes later)
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 12:59 pm
by TheIrishPope
You see? That right there is Town frustration. Don't lynch him.
VOTE: fferyllt
Insurance
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 1:29 pm
by fferyllt
In post 591, Cheery Dog wrote:I closed my tab directly after posting it to calm down, so maybe not that much rage, just getting fed up. (can't have been that bad when I was able to explain it slightly 10 minutes later)
Ah. Ok. Been there done that. My posts are usually still pretty terse when I come back after 10 minutes.
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:58 pm
by Grimgroove
I didn't complain, I like walls.
Could you give and explain your reads please?
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:59 pm
by Grimgroove
Why not scum frustration?
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:14 am
by TheIrishPope
Reads today, but to answer your
595
Scum frustration is generally more chaotic, unbalanced, and full of aggressive AtE, such as: "Don't lynch me or you'll regret it" or TYPING IN ALL CAPS BECAUSE I CAN. Town frustration is giving up and not caring at all, because he feels Town has let him down.
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 11:07 am
by Grimgroove
I can't say I agree with this interpretation.
And this conclude's today's extraordinary events in this game, with a grand total of six exciting posts. More tomorrow?
Not from me, because I'll be V/LA for a day. Hope to be welcomed back with a flurry of new information when I get back.
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 3:03 pm
by fferyllt
In post 592, TheIrishPope wrote:You see? That right there is Town frustration. Don't lynch him.
VOTE: fferyllt
Insurance
If you want something to happen with this you should probably present a case or yell "EAT ROPE" or something.
I think you're wrong about cheery.
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 3:18 pm
by TheIrishPope
I don't want anything to happen with it, I just don't know where to put my vote
I think you're wrong about cheery.