Mafiascum.net

I'm so very to hear from Varsoon and roflcopter.

In post 572, TheIrishPope wrote:We lynch Zoidberg
NOW

Hold that thought for a sec. Just hush. I know what I'm doing.

Prodding roflcopter and who.

In post 572, TheIrishPope wrote:We lynch Zoidberg
NOW

I know what you are going to say. Just wait.

Zoid, what was rofl's result?

In post 546, Varsoon wrote:

In post 545, T S O wrote:

In post 542, Varsoon wrote:TSO, what are you implying with that post?

That I'm trolling, probably.

Please don't. Zoid's 'trolling' is already annoying enough.


@Psyche: Fair enough, man. Wait until I post my mc-huge-case on Zoidberg, and if you don't like it, I don't blame you.
Also, you're right, I do have access to more information than a Vanilla Townie, but I don't like my cases being wholly reliant on information only available to myself, if that makes any sense.

Desperado, look at this.

Looks like a contradiction to me.

He was saying things that others were interpreting as a soft claim (I know Zoid is scum), and then said "I am not soft claiming anything."

Then he says he has information (that implicates Zoid as scum) but he doesn't want that to be the whole case? Why not?

If he's a PR then his info on Zoidscum is all he needs.

So yeah, I saw it. He's scum.

He might be a PR who has no information yet and just has really bad reads.

... but I doubt it.

Zoid, result on rofl. Give it.

Guilty

W o r d.

In post 586, T S O wrote:W o r d.

?

Not sure what this means, or what you expected other than "guilty."

I mean did you think I was going to say "Innocent"?

I was just confirming it was Guilty, lol. There's no ulterior motive, though the spaces could be indicative of doubt.

Your reaction was quite interesting, though.

In post 588, T S O wrote:I was just confirming it was Guilty, lol. There's no ulterior motive, though the spaces could be indicative of doubt.

Your reaction was quite interesting, though.

You asked twice with no ulterior motive?

Varsoon, Zoidberg happened to be talking about a vig a little before a dayvig occurred, nothing strange about that. You made it sound as if he mentioned a dayvig.
VOTE: Roflcopter
If Zoidberg is wrong, we can lynch him tomorrow (And/or if there is a RBer/vig/whatever they can hit him tonight). In the meantime, we should lynch roflcopter who already has reasons to be lynched before a daycop comes into things.

Reading Varsoon's case in full, I have no problem seeing Zoid bussing rofl here. The case is good.

Zoid's "I'm trying to be like Nacho" line and then complaining about Varsoon's AtE right before calling us all sheep for believing his case are amazingly miscalculated.

Also, seeing that case and then just claiming without even bothering to address anything Varsoon said is super scummy.

In post 591, Desperado wrote:Reading Varsoon's case in full, I have no problem seeing Zoid bussing rofl here. The case is good.

Zoid's "I'm trying to be like Nacho" line and then complaining about Varsoon's AtE right before calling us all sheep for believing his case are amazingly miscalculated.

Also, seeing that case and then just claiming without even bothering to address anything Varsoon said is super scummy.

Then vote rofl with me, and then we can argue about whether or not I was bussing tomorrow.

In post 559, Zoidberg wrote:Fuck it.

I'm Tracer Bullet. I have 8 slugs in me. One is a bullet, and the other 7 are bourbon. The drink packs a wallop and I pack a revolver. One of my abilities is a 1x daycop. I used it on Roflcopter after he reacted weirdly to my rolename speculation. It wasn't a deliberate reaction test, but his reaction seemed false (I described why in a previous post).

Is this like a JOAT with 8 different abilities including daycop?

In post 559, Zoidberg wrote:Psyche's decision to vote me after varsoon has explicitly said he's not claiming cop, after defending and chainsawing me all day, and after admitting the case against me has no merit has zero town motivation. Such actions can only come from scum.

agreed

In post 593, Rubicon wrote:Is this like a JOAT with 8 different abilities including daycop?

No, it is not an 8-ability JOAT.

explain it to me then?

Alright Zoidberg, I'll bite on your claim.

In post 595, Rubicon wrote:explain it to me then?

It's a JOAT with fewer than 8 abilities.

In post 597, Zoidberg wrote:

In post 595, Rubicon wrote:explain it to me then?

It's a JOAT with fewer than 8 abilities.

JOAT can usually only use each ability 1x. Is that the case here? You said 7 bourbon + 1 slug.