Page 24 of 53

Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 7:27 am
by Cabd
In post 574, Rebel Without a Pulse wrote:HEY CABD YOU FUCKED UP BIG TIME BUDDY
DANIEL BRYAN IS AT 6 VOTES, NOT 5
:[

worst mod 2013
You're dead, your vote does not count. (Fixed~)

Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 7:47 am
by Titus
The above post appears to be a joke.


Will post something of substance later tonight.

Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 8:09 am
by Rail Tracer
cabd wrote:You're dead, your vote does not count.
omg... i cannot believe you modkilled him for something like th-
In post 576, Titus wrote:
The above post appears to be a joke.
oh, now i see what's going on.

jeez, had me fooled for a moment.

Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 8:11 am
by notscience
Shit, my one-shot daykill didn't go through


Why so fluffy Titus?

Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 9:18 am
by Sound of Silence
In post 578, notscience wrote:
Shit, my one-shot daykill didn't go through


Why so fluffy Titus?
This is a good observation.

Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 9:29 am
by Natirasha
Eh, it's fluffy but I'm getting really strong town read off Titus at the moment. I don't get the Rail Tracer vote really, but everything else adds up in my book.

Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 1:13 pm
by Titus
In post 577, Rail Tracer wrote:
cabd wrote:You're dead, your vote does not count.
omg... i cannot believe you modkilled him for something like th-
In post 576, Titus wrote:
The above post appears to be a joke.
oh, now i see what's going on.

jeez, had me fooled for a moment.

That is exactly why I posted the post above. I actually thought RT was dead a moment too. Given RT's reaction mirrored mine, I'd likely suspect he's town. He could have faked this (unlikely) but for now I'll move RT into nulltown.


That post was not fluff. I said more substantive content later but I intended that post to be helpful.

Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 1:56 pm
by notscience
When did I say it was just that post?

Overall you've been fluffing the whole thread up.

And ftr- Yes it was fluff.

Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 8:13 pm
by Sound of Silence
I wish the post that triggered this awesome page were actually on this page. I'd print and frame it.

Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 10:52 pm
by Dessew
Rebel:
I didn't like the "I don't know what you're talking about" part, but I don't think that that's alignment indicative. Gut reads: I think they're fine, they don't contradict each other directly, I mean he wasn't jumping on and off wagons etc. He criticized your play, but has a townread on you. Communication of heads: bad past experience, whatev. Painting negative: you yourself approved it (ish), there could be some discussion about it, though. And his reads can change, he brought up reasons about it (the Brian-case). And it's much more safe to call people town than scum, so not having scumreads (at all) can be a valid scumread, imo.
And there was a fuck-up from my part, I didn't check if his answer was true to the first question, he did not use the word "scummy", he had HP in his town pile in that post, I think that the part that could be emphasized a little (a lot) more.

Brian: Your vote came off to me as if you wanted make it look like it had nothing to do with Rebel's case.

#578: I absolutely agree.

Daniel: what do you think of AK, Mario, Mogamma and Titus?

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:19 am
by Rail Tracer
friendly advice because i'm a friendly guy.

i suggest someone hammers in the next (expired on 2013-09-23 19:00:00) because that sounds like a good idea.

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:31 am
by Brian Skies
In post 584, Dessew wrote:Brian: Your vote came off to me as if you wanted make it look like it had nothing to do with Rebel's case.
That's fine.

I still like this wagon and I'm not moving my vote.

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:39 am
by Sound of Silence
In post 585, Rail Tracer wrote:friendly advice because i'm a friendly guy.

i suggest someone hammers in the next (expired on 2013-09-23 19:00:00) because that sounds like a good idea.
Mogamma hasn't posted in 6 days. Hopefully they've been prodded.

Titus
Mario
Dessew
notscience

If you haven't explained why the Daniel Bryan wagon is a no-go for you please do so.

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:06 am
by Mario and the Diamonds
I'm going to look through his posts and see if I think he's scummy. I make no promises but I'd really like to hammer him. My vote should be useful in some way. Please be patient. This is a very confusing time for me. Puberty sucks. Also mafia. Mafia sucks too. I was kidding about the puberty part.

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:09 am
by Natirasha
Hey ns sheep ffery nacho and I for free town points/bussing your partner.

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:10 am
by Natirasha
In post 588, Mario and the Diamonds wrote:I'm going to look through his posts and see if I think he's scummy. I make no promises but I'd really like to hammer him. My vote should be useful in some way. Please be patient. This is a very confusing time for me. Puberty sucks. Also mafia. Mafia sucks too. I was kidding about the puberty part.
Bleh.

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:18 am
by Dessew
It's not a no-go for me, his last posts ("lynch RT!") are desperate, and there's the part of Rebel's case that I approve.
Intent to hammer.
I will hammer on Monday 7 am (CEST). But before that I'd like to discuss some players. Well, I want to discuss Titus.
He plays very similarly to Fu, imo, probably because that playstyke earned a townread for Fu from a lot of players. Also, DB voted RT after Titus said that he had a scumread on RT. My theory is that (they might be scumbuddies and) DB thought it was a counterwagon attempt and Titus will come up with an actual case. He didn't know that Titus wanted to dive deeply into nullishness, so he won't post any case. But he later clinged to his RT-vote, because the connection either would be unnoticed or would be considered so obvious that Titus gets towncred. So I'm saying that if Daniel flips scum, I'm willing to lynch Titus tomorrow.

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 9:42 am
by Titus
SoS, I've had my concerns just because of the lack of a counterwagon but I don't have any problems with those voting DB. His reaction to my suggestion RT might be scum because of my gut feeling immediately caused a vote. Given we haven't played together, he shouldn't be sheeping my gut. DB also hasn't put up much of a defense himself. There's enough there to warrant hammering
back up intent to hammer
, I just was concerned because it was too easy.

I haven't played a lot with Fu. Usually I end up replacing into games he was in and left. I'll give you my playstyle in a nutshell. Look at the facts. See what is good and see what isn't. If I see something as off, I say something, even if I'm not sure what's causing me to feel that way. If I cannot get proof or disproof of what I'm feeling, I push it. I was just saying that RT felt off. Why are you supposing that DB and I this overarching plan? This makes me wonder whether you know that DB might flip scum and you're positioning my lynch in the event DB does flip scum.

Mario, you're willing to hammer a slot you haven't read and aren't sure is scummy? What the fuck?

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:13 pm
by notscience
Dat amished. Is anyone else noticing Titus is avoiding like half the playerlist?

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:19 pm
by Cabd
PSA: your mod is out camping and a hailstorm is rolling in. I may not be around for the next day or so.

Ill get a messy vote count thrown up if too much changes.

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 2:57 pm
by Sound of Silence
In post 593, notscience wrote:Dat amished. Is anyone else noticing Titus is avoiding like half the playerlist?
I'm not seeing an amished here. What are you talking about?

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 3:14 pm
by notscience
In post 592, Titus wrote:I haven't played a lot with Fu. Usually I end up replacing into games he was in and left.
I might have replacements mixed.

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 3:24 pm
by Sound of Silence
How is that an amished? She did replace into the FuDuzn slot, but I don't see the amished.

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 3:33 pm
by notscience
I see it as a response to the comment of her playing fluff-like such as her predecessor.

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 3:40 pm
by Sound of Silence
In post 598, notscience wrote:I see it as a response to the comment of her playing fluff-like such as her predecessor.
amished is usually something disparaging, and is often either an apology for or a denigration of the predecessor.

When someone brings the predecessor up in a comment about the replacement, I don't think the results (unless they are pretty blatant) are all that indicative.