Page 24 of 237

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:04 pm
by Kagami
Actually, jaqen's point is pretty good... Why is bubba the partner?

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:14 pm
by Yukari Yakumo

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:52 pm
by Jaqen Hghar
In post 575, Kagami wrote:Actually, jaqen's point is pretty good... Why is bubba the partner?
When a man reads in context and in ISO bubba is content to try to make people like him, to post naught but fluff, and to attempt to look town over jaut doing things town do to root out scum. This
We just finished saying we don't like it when people say things like this.
from post is weird. A man looked over and over again to find where he and this mystery other said they didnt like when people alluded to their role pm to clear someone and never found it, so the man is left wondering who this wight he conversed with is and where the conversation was had.

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:57 pm
by zMuffinMan
mac wrote:I can't read muffin usually so he's town!
interesting. i thought you'd be a lot more wary about putting me anywhere near your town reads, not the first person you call town
lush life wrote:Spoiler: Why Bubba is ObvScum

So can we please lynch this thing now?
i'm reading pretty much all the stuff there as not alignment indicative. only thing that really bothers me about bubba is the complete lack of wanting to find scum

i dunno, i'm generally shit at reading players like bubba

thoughts on pieguy?
a man wrote:In the bold, a boy (cabd) is admonishing his teammates to read stuff before posting and giving their scum selves over their own laziness.
i don't see it. the second bolded part was obviously referring to people posting at the time who were oblivious to the IC announcement. the first bolded part is meh
kagami wrote:Rem's replacement probably proves her town.
kagami wrote:Rem is either legit invoking a trust tell (and yes, this is a trust tell), or she's using a false tell to push her towniness. Hard to say which
i don't like the way you're waffling on this so much, and now calling the rem-slot town while still voting them
kagami wrote:jaqen's point is pretty good
Spoiler:
Image

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:02 pm
by Kagami
I would guess that's a reference to 197, with "we" meaning the town as a group. Doesn't seem likely that the mystery other would be in a scum QT given the nature of the statement.

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:08 pm
by Kagami
Wasn't terribly obvious to me either, but it does make sense.

Cadb says that town doesn't read the mod-post, but scum do. Then says to the group of people, many who seemed to have missed the IC announcement, "but you all missed it, shame on you." This doesn't make sense from town-frame, because if everyone there is town, then this is perfectly consistent with the first statement. He expresses surprise, though, suggesting that he's observed that scum also have failed to read the mod-post.

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:15 pm
by zMuffinMan
o wait, i get it now

that actually makes sense

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:17 pm
by Jaqen Hghar
In post 302, morph the cat wrote:My initial thought was that town was more likely to skip over the posts form the mod
whereas scum was more likely to read it thoroughly
, but that theory was clearly flawed.
You all ought to be ashamed of yourselves.
A man will break this down a little more thoroughly for Muffin

-cabd believes town would be more apt to skip the mod opening sequence
-cabd believes scum would be more likely to read the opening lest they miss something that could screw up
their game
-cabd says "You all ought to be ashamed of yourselves."
-as cabd believes town less likely read the opening, he would have nothing to be ashmed of for town missing
the IC
-as cabd believes scum should have read the opening, and aparently didn't, the statement of shame can only
be applied to those he's shaming. The scum.
-this leads a resonable man to ponder,
why wold a town cabd be motivated to help scum?

-since cabd took the chance to do this ITT, it further implies the lack of day talk.

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:20 pm
by Kagami
If it's true, it implies kaze or lush as partner. I was kind of townreading both =\

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:21 pm
by zMuffinMan
yeah, yeah, i put two and two together after kagami's 580

i'm reading back over it now. i'm getting icky feelings about morph trying to call bubba's post a townslip

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:22 pm
by Jaqen Hghar
In post 293, morph the cat wrote:
In post 291, bubbajack8 wrote:Holy shit seriously? He hasn't even posted!
So uh guys that care. Townslip?
And a man thinks this is where cabd's disappointment is directed, though it could be another.

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:23 pm
by Kagami
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Morph

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:25 pm
by Jaqen Hghar
A man has seen cabd bring down his whole scum team with one of his slips before so this my be just so Kagami. That makes at least three who see and know.

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:27 pm
by dramonic
Too many posts, too much creative license abuse.

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:30 pm
by Lush Life
this is bork trying to type w/ 1 hand cause babby

tl;dr I don't think mtc slipped I'll type more when he's asleep

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:31 pm
by Jaqen Hghar
In post 588, dramonic wrote:Too many posts, too much creative license abuse.
A boy could skip them all and vote Morph on faith.

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:31 pm
by dramonic
In post 590, Jaqen Hghar wrote:
In post 588, dramonic wrote:Too many posts, too much creative license abuse.
A boy could skip them all and vote Morph on faith.
I kinda like not voting based on dumb cases.
It's a rare condition I have

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:33 pm
by zMuffinMan
Unvote
Vote: Morph

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:34 pm
by Jaqen Hghar
In post 583, Kagami wrote:If it's true, it implies kaze or lush as partner. I was kind of townreading both =\
In post 589, Lush Life wrote:this is bork trying to type w/ 1 hand cause babby

tl;dr I don't think mtc slipped I'll type more when he's asleep
In post 591, dramonic wrote:
In post 590, Jaqen Hghar wrote:
In post 588, dramonic wrote:Too many posts, too much creative license abuse.
A boy could skip them all and vote Morph on faith.
I kinda like not voting based on dumb cases.
It's a rare condition I have
then a boy must explain how it's a dumb case. Ref 582 as you do so.

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:36 pm
by Lush Life
jaqen

I don't like kagami or muffin

where are you at with them?

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:38 pm
by Jaqen Hghar
A man has given his thoughts on Kagami; tldr is probablytown. Muffin is unsorted.

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:39 pm
by Jaqen Hghar
In post 567, Jaqen Hghar wrote:A man thinks Kagami is town. But only because she doesn't seem overly concerned as to what she posts or what others think of those post. A girl could certainly put forth more, but that's enough for a maybe town, yes?

Ah. Yes, but a man begged for his innocence to be kept secret until the timing was just so.

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:39 pm
by Lush Life
In post 582, Jaqen Hghar wrote:A man will break this down a little more thoroughly for Muffin

-cabd believes town would be more apt to skip the mod opening sequence
-cabd believes scum would be more likely to read the opening lest they miss something that could screw up
their game
-cabd says "You all ought to be ashamed of yourselves."
-as cabd believes town less likely read the opening, he would have nothing to be ashmed of for town missing
the IC
-as cabd believes scum should have read the opening, and aparently didn't, the statement of shame can only
be applied to those he's shaming. The scum.
-this leads a resonable man to ponder, why wold a town cabd be motivated to help scum?
-since cabd took the chance to do this ITT, it further implies the lack of day talk.
Don't agree:

You are leaving out the conclusive part of their post:
My initial thought was that town was more likely to skip over the posts form the mod whereas scum was more likely to read it thoroughly, but that theory was clearly flawed. You all ought to be ashamed of yourselves.
I see this as "my hypothesis was a reaction to <x> might be alignment sensitive. However, everyone reacted identically to <x> from what I saw, so I had to chuck that hypothesis" the conclusion was that he was wrong to assume that.

I don't see how you can argue that "you ought to be ashamed of yourselves" is them admonishing their scumbuddies for what? fitting in? how does that hurt them if they're scum? This doesn't hold water.

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:43 pm
by zMuffinMan
lush life wrote:I don't see how you can argue that "you ought to be ashamed of yourselves" is them admonishing their scumbuddies
i'm thinking about it a different way

who ought to be ashamed of themselves?

if he's referring to town here, why should they be ashamed of something he supposedly thought town would do (i.e. not read the initial post in its entirety)?

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:46 pm
by Lush Life
In post 598, zMuffinMan wrote:if he's referring to town here, why should they be ashamed of something he supposedly thought town would do (i.e. not read the initial post in its entirety)?
I agree with that too, actually, but it makes just as little sense if he's talking to scum there. He's not going to (even subconscously) call his buddies out publicly in-thread.

The only perspective it really makes sense from is "why did nobody but me read this?" which is null.