Iec saw something I missed in his
252. Perhaps I was wrong about him. In fact, I believed there may be some sort of connection between farside and Gothic when their similar posts (
123 /
130) caught my eye and this strengthens that read.
Gothic's reaction to Iec's 252 (in
261) also concerns me: "I feel good about you and andy did feel good about iceyrent up until the last but eh.", especially in tandem with my theory. If my theory proves to be correct, we can certainly end this game in a swift fashion.
More useless drivel in
270 from Nacho. Disgusting.
Pine's claim does not concern me - and of course, the claim was false. I find Iec looking better after that slew of mindless blathering, and All Is Who's vote in
321 looks worse as a result. Pine and ABR jumping on Iec is... odd, as I am currently townreading all of them.
As for why I find Iec more town - it comes across as "panicked" town (for lack of a better word) trying to confirm details. It does not feel like something town could fake.
All is Who's
416 is abysmal. It doesn't feel natural. The lack of feeling is what I would expect from a mongrel; it's a shame, I had high hopes from your earlier performance.
↑ FourTrouble wrote:I don't see what's so scummy about ABR. I'd much rather lynch Andrius or one of the folks opposing his lynch.
The irony in this statement alone is palpable.
Pine's
466 gives me an odd feeling. I dislike players who dismiss arguments as 'town versus town'.
Victor has finally decided to make an appearance. (
492).
86 - I find this vote over explained, almost trying too hard to go beyond the reasons Pine voted for ABR.
87 - This defense of ABR is worth noting if he's scum.
What is it with you mongrels and your incredibly
obvious
irony?
I skimmed from this point to catch up, as I began to become increasingly bored.
Willing to tolerate - Iec, Titus, ABR, Andrius
Players of interest - Pine, farside, Victor
Mongrels - Southern Gothic, All is Who
??? - Peregrine, Nacho, 4Trouble
---
Iec wrote:Depending on how much you're skimming, you may have misread my first one. The "grounds" I am referring to were what I perceived to be Konowa's, not mine.
My point was that your post read "I will not lynch farside on the grounds that X", implying "I will lynch farside on the grounds that Y". Do you lack reading comprehension, mongrel? Consider yourself lucky that I am willing to ignore you for now.
↑ Andrius wrote:gilgamesh wrote:Greetings, mongrels.
It seems the gods have decided that my duty is to grace you all with my presence in this laughable excuse for entertainment you call a "mafia game".
Very well. I shall allow you all to entertain me.
The join date of yesterday explains the odd behavior. Welcome, Gilgamesh. I don't understand your self-elevated posting style.
Gilgamesh wrote:Oh... I see. You claim to be a god of some kind. Only a mongrel would delude himself with such grandeur.
To mean that would be blasphemy.
I serve the one true higher power and am blessed with his graces.
I await your interpretation of the intetions of these players gathered here, myself least of these.
Though I think your attitude is unbecoming, and somewhat annoying.
Know your place, mongrel. The next time you address me in such a tone, I will take your head.
---
VOTE: Southern Gothic - this is the player not worthy to remain in my presence. I will accept no others.