Page 24 of 287

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 7:32 pm
by beeboy
Tammy wrote:If by pointing out that your over generalizations are over generalized, not helpful, or convincing in any way, then sure I'm defending them. I look at it at looking past that and trying to figure out the actual read.

If your case is based on being able to read them really well then the overgeneralized stuff is not necessary and I need to cut through stuff I don't buy into to see something that makes sense.


Yes 500 posts later I am still voting them because I don't like there RVS I don't see the problem with that.

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 7:39 pm
by podoboq
Friendless Seniors wrote:I'm largely ignoring beeboy here. I dislike how much we are being discussed. It makes no sense considering we had done nothing at the time

Friendless Seniors wrote:
SirCakez wrote:Tictac if your read on them is null I don't understand this defense of them at all. Seniors has done stuff, nothing useful though and the Snarky vote was pretty bad.

SirCakez wrote:Tictac what's your read on Seniors?

SirCakez wrote:Snarky is lynchbait so Beeboy's argument about Seniors pushing Snarky being a scum move does hold weight. Thus why I am still voting them.

SirCakez wrote:Don't like Beeboy's flipflop on Sakura. Felt like there was no dedication or serious belief in it with how fast he got on and off.
Seniors's Snarky vote is bad as well. Not enough to justify it and Snarky is definitely not someone you get a serious scumread on from one post.

SirCakez wrote:
True Ogre wrote:VOTE: Friendless Seniors

Why not vote anyone in your entrance then immediately sheep Beeboy onto Seniors?


These stances make no sense. Like, he is basically scumreading anyone making any sort of impact in the game. This is a super opportunistic position in the game and needs to be lynched.

@TrueOgre

In my skim, I was very confident in my reads on beeboy and Cakez as town. Both of them reading FS as scum makes me question FS pretty strongly.

I think their opinion on Cakez is kind of just bullshit, and I think "ignoring" beeboy is mindless. I'll be re-reading the thread after I get my classwork done this weekend, but in the meantime, based on my skim, I'm pretty comfortable pushing the wagon along.

But yeah, honestly, I think most of my read is coming from town reading Cakez and beeboy. Maybe part of it comes from the skimming. Maybe part of it is something subliminal coming from the Trump icon. I'll be reviewing this weekend, and I don't expect a lynch to happen before then.

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:22 pm
by Tammy
beeboy wrote:
Tammy wrote:If by pointing out that your over generalizations are over generalized, not helpful, or convincing in any way, then sure I'm defending them. I look at it at looking past that and trying to figure out the actual read.

If your case is based on being able to read them really well then the overgeneralized stuff is not necessary and I need to cut through stuff I don't buy into to see something that makes sense.


Yes 500 posts later I am still voting them because I don't like there RVS I don't see the problem with that.


I have no idea if you're serious here.

But even if so, you're completely missing my point. You're making overgeneralizations about play in general and then saying oh I can read them.

The play should be about them in particular. You're saying no town would make a naked vote after one hour. That's just objectively wrong, and if you're going to claim no town do things I've seen town do all the time and do myself, I'm not going to take you seriously.

If you're going to talk about why it's specific to them, talk about that. Otherwise you're just blowing hot air.

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:31 pm
by Mirhawk
Checking in
davesaz wrote:
The way you are continuing to engage screams town, compared to Mirhawk who just figuratively crossed his arms and stopped listening.

This is coming from the guy who started ignoring me when he realized he couldn't justify his vote.

When you started avoiding me I engaged with other things, when ami didn't come back I did the same thing.

@pistachio
I've never played with an actual miller that I remember but in one game a scum player claimed miller than claimed it was a gambit and used my reaction to the claim to mislynch me.
Which is why I was so supicious of Ami, and to be honest still kind of am.

In either case I totally called that shit and whoever it was that said I was setting myself up to say that (TWL?) Can eat me cause I was totally right.

Anyways just realized pretty much every person on my wagon (except maybe cakes) is my scum pool (which kind of shitty but whatever).

Dave's scum. I'll probably say a bunch of stuff about it later when I have access to a pc.
Unvote
Vote: Dave
p

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:33 pm
by beeboy
Tammy wrote:
beeboy wrote:
Tammy wrote:If by pointing out that your over generalizations are over generalized, not helpful, or convincing in any way, then sure I'm defending them. I look at it at looking past that and trying to figure out the actual read.

If your case is based on being able to read them really well then the overgeneralized stuff is not necessary and I need to cut through stuff I don't buy into to see something that makes sense.


Yes 500 posts later I am still voting them because I don't like there RVS I don't see the problem with that.


I have no idea if you're serious here.

But even if so, you're completely missing my point. You're making overgeneralizations about play in general and then saying oh I can read them.

The play should be about them in particular. You're saying no town would make a naked vote after one hour. That's just objectively wrong, and if you're going to claim no town do things I've seen town do all the time and do myself, I'm not going to take you seriously.

If you're going to talk about why it's specific to them, talk about that. Otherwise you're just blowing hot air.

No point in defending a push I made for a variety of reasons most of which have nothing to do with wanting Seniors lynched since my read has seriously evolved from where you are at right now.
I understand the point you are making but you are looking at what I am doing in a vacuum aren't looking at other players all that much and I still feel as though what you are doing this game underwhelming.
I feel as though what I did helped progress the game and if you don't think it is productive and you don't want to take me serious that is all on you but I am going to keep doing what I am doing.

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:34 pm
by Tammy
The Pied Piper wrote:
What I think is scummy about Friendless Seniors, aside from the SnarkySnowman vote, is that they have made a bunch of posts over the span of an hour, but in those posts, they did virtually nothing. I do not think it is scummy that various people haven't posted yet, or that there are people with only 1-2 posts. But if someone has several posts spread out over some time, but there is nothing worth reading in those posts, that's scummy. Errant's wall is the first thing of substance from that slot, but I know that they're capable of writing walls as both alignments and I want to digest it when I'm less tired.


I don't have any problem at all if in the beginning of the game someone posts a bunch and doesn't do anything. (I have a habit of not taking anything seriously and goofing off for the first 5 or so pages if the mood strikes me.) I am interested in that wall though as the points were meh.

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:37 pm
by Tammy
beeboy wrote:
Tammy wrote:
beeboy wrote:
Tammy wrote:If by pointing out that your over generalizations are over generalized, not helpful, or convincing in any way, then sure I'm defending them. I look at it at looking past that and trying to figure out the actual read.

If your case is based on being able to read them really well then the overgeneralized stuff is not necessary and I need to cut through stuff I don't buy into to see something that makes sense.


Yes 500 posts later I am still voting them because I don't like there RVS I don't see the problem with that.


I have no idea if you're serious here.

But even if so, you're completely missing my point. You're making overgeneralizations about play in general and then saying oh I can read them.

The play should be about them in particular. You're saying no town would make a naked vote after one hour. That's just objectively wrong, and if you're going to claim no town do things I've seen town do all the time and do myself, I'm not going to take you seriously.

If you're going to talk about why it's specific to them, talk about that. Otherwise you're just blowing hot air.

No point in defending a push I made for a variety of reasons most of which have nothing to do with wanting Seniors lynched since my read has seriously evolved from where you are at right now.
I understand the point you are making but you are looking at what I am doing in a vacuum aren't looking at other players all that much and I still feel as though what you are doing this game underwhelming.
I feel as though what I did helped progress the game and if you don't think it is productive and you don't want to take me serious that is all on you but I am going to keep doing what I am doing.


OKAY!

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:44 pm
by The Pied Piper
@True Ogre

Are you feigning an inability to tell us apart in order to keep your main a secret, or for some other reason? I'm not interested in outing you but I do know who you are.

@Sakura

Sakura Hana wrote:
The Pied Piper wrote:The Odds and that horrid blitz as well.

Interestingly enough I feel like the way Hippy's been treated is similar to how i was treated on "that horrid blitz" with beeboy playing the role of Wisdom.
Sakura Hana wrote:Just like Wisdom was town on Blitz and I kept scumreading him because all he did was say "Scum scum scum, meta meta meta" and pretty much just boxed me in and didnt let me defend myself that i went and ragequit MS.
That game hurt. I should've replaced out too but I didn't want to abandon my hydra partner who was also having a terrible time and we didn't trust a replacement to find our crumbs. For me, it wasn't
just
being tunnelled for 90 pages by Wisdom/hiplop/Expedience/RC/Spiffeh/etc that made it soul crushing, part of it was being put in a box and not being let out of the box but also some of the ways I was being pushed when I was having trouble communicating reminded me of things I don't want to talk about and there wasn't any single post that I could point to and say this crossed the line, there was nothing I could explain coherently not even postgame about what was wrong. I'm sorry I couldn't break out of my own box to help you out of your box. I am glad you came back after all. I had to take over a month break too and I'm still not really over it. I think you are right that seniors may be being boxed in but I think they could be scum this time :( But I don't want to do to them what they helped do to me, not even if they're scum, so I'd like to look elsewhere for now. I think it would be easier to read Seniors accurately if they were allowed out of their box.


@Axelrod

Regarding , thanks for the explanation, that makes a lot of sense. Being 90% certain seems like hyperbole to me, but I agree that he seems sincere in his hyperbole. Are you still townreading Mirhawk?

@Wrong lynch

I hope you feel better soon! Regarding , Sakura has a lot more history with Nacho than with Plot though. You're right that she hasn't really reached out to us very hard yet. I'm hoping this will change when she returns from her V/LA. I'm willing to trust goodmorning on beeboy for now since she's played with him recently but it's ridiculous that someone has written over 25% of the game all by himself, and Tammy and pistachi0n are right that when you boil it down there's just not a lot there. I've been trying to think if this is how i feel about beeboy or not:

The less you have to sell, the harder you sell it!
The less you have to say, the louder you yell it!
The dumber the act, the bigger the confession!
The less you have to show, the larger you dress it!


I mean it is how I feel I just don't think he's scum for it which is unfortunate, because I'd support a policy lynch there if I didn't have stronger scumreads elsewhere, namely: Mirhawk. I'm interested in your Mirhawk push. I was okay with their earlier posting, such as and , at the time they were posted, but davesaz is a fairly easy target so I'm not as happy with those posts now as I was when I first read them.

I like that in they point out that being self involved isn't a scumtell because I agree that it's a humantell not a scumtell. I don't like that the rest of that post is semantics and also this post is defending Seniors from beeboy. I've been trying to figure out if Mirhawk is whiteknighting town Seniors or defending a buddy but there's been enough resistance to the Seniors wagon and if Mirhawk has prior experience with beeboy then Mirhawk might have been able to predict that beeboy wouldn't let go once he latched on. Mirhawk does confirm in that they've played together before with beeboy.

I agree with a lot of the points that are being made against them, especially that they seem to be working from too much information. Mirhawk seemed to know that Ami was gambitting when the rest of us didn't and I wasn't impressed with their posturing around the claims, for example and just don't seem natural. Mirhawk first is suspecting that Ami is scum counterclaiming Pistachi0n which someone mentioned would be suicidal if they were scum and I agree and seems to already know that Pistachi0n is town but doesn't mind lynching them anyway. I agree with everyone who has raised these points.

When Mirhawk tried to push Ami to reveal that she's not really a miller, i was thinking that Mirhawk was distancing from her buddy's suicidal scumplay but I think it just makes more sense as a reaction test now that it's been retracted and both Ami and Pistachi0n are probably town. I think Mirhawk knew that they were both town from the start and has been doing a poor job of hiding it. I find it's a lot easier to spot a gambit when I'm scum because it helps that I already know the alignments of the people who are doing it, so it pings me that Mirhawk's first assumption was gambit and was trying to push for the gambit to be revealed before it was when it's better to let as many people react to it as possible. I think Mirhawk felt threatened that a number of people would look town via their reactions to Amihan's gambit and wanted to cut it off early.

VOTE: Mirhawk L-6

pedit: Mirhawk wants towncred for knowing pistachi0n's alignment. I am happy with my vote.

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:03 pm
by davesaz
Mirhawk wrote:Checking in
davesaz wrote:
The way you are continuing to engage screams town, compared to Mirhawk who just figuratively crossed his arms and stopped listening.

This is coming from the guy who started ignoring me when he realized he couldn't justify his vote.

When you started avoiding me I engaged with other things, when ami didn't come back I did the same thing.

I'm not aware of anything from you that I have avoided. If there is anything you'd like to know I'm happy to oblige.
The fact remains that my play style is to ask oblique questions. 9-10 players in this game (counting hydras as 1) have personally seen me do it.

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:14 pm
by beeboy
Sorry Tammy I am irritable because it is 4am for me I will avoid playing out the rest of the game like that.

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:23 pm
by The Pied Piper
beeboy wrote:Sorry Tammy I am irritable because it is 4am for me I will avoid playing out the rest of the game like that.

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:24 pm
by The Pied Piper
Tammy wrote:
beeboy wrote:
Tammy wrote:
beeboy wrote:
Tammy wrote:If by pointing out that your over generalizations are over generalized, not helpful, or convincing in any way, then sure I'm defending them. I look at it at looking past that and trying to figure out the actual read.

If your case is based on being able to read them really well then the overgeneralized stuff is not necessary and I need to cut through stuff I don't buy into to see something that makes sense.


Yes 500 posts later I am still voting them because I don't like there RVS I don't see the problem with that.


I have no idea if you're serious here.

But even if so, you're completely missing my point. You're making overgeneralizations about play in general and then saying oh I can read them.

The play should be about them in particular. You're saying no town would make a naked vote after one hour. That's just objectively wrong, and if you're going to claim no town do things I've seen town do all the time and do myself, I'm not going to take you seriously.

If you're going to talk about why it's specific to them, talk about that. Otherwise you're just blowing hot air.

No point in defending a push I made for a variety of reasons most of which have nothing to do with wanting Seniors lynched since my read has seriously evolved from where you are at right now.
I understand the point you are making but you are looking at what I am doing in a vacuum aren't looking at other players all that much and I still feel as though what you are doing this game underwhelming.
I feel as though what I did helped progress the game and if you don't think it is productive and you don't want to take me serious that is all on you but I am going to keep doing what I am doing.


OKAY!

Tammy wrote:
The Pied Piper wrote:
What I think is scummy about Friendless Seniors, aside from the SnarkySnowman vote, is that they have made a bunch of posts over the span of an hour, but in those posts, they did virtually nothing. I do not think it is scummy that various people haven't posted yet, or that there are people with only 1-2 posts. But if someone has several posts spread out over some time, but there is nothing worth reading in those posts, that's scummy. Errant's wall is the first thing of substance from that slot, but I know that they're capable of writing walls as both alignments and I want to digest it when I'm less tired.


I don't have any problem at all if in the beginning of the game someone posts a bunch and doesn't do anything. (I have a habit of not taking anything seriously and goofing off for the first 5 or so pages if the mood strikes me.) I am interested in that wall though as the points were meh.

Tammy wrote:
beeboy wrote:
Tammy wrote:If by pointing out that your over generalizations are over generalized, not helpful, or convincing in any way, then sure I'm defending them. I look at it at looking past that and trying to figure out the actual read.

If your case is based on being able to read them really well then the overgeneralized stuff is not necessary and I need to cut through stuff I don't buy into to see something that makes sense.


Yes 500 posts later I am still voting them because I don't like there RVS I don't see the problem with that.


I have no idea if you're serious here.

But even if so, you're completely missing my point. You're making overgeneralizations about play in general and then saying oh I can read them.

The play should be about them in particular. You're saying no town would make a naked vote after one hour. That's just objectively wrong, and if you're going to claim no town do things I've seen town do all the time and do myself, I'm not going to take you seriously.

If you're going to talk about why it's specific to them, talk about that. Otherwise you're just blowing hot air.

i have no idea when these were posted but all they feel like is betrayal

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:25 pm
by The Pied Piper
can someone explain why they feel that way?

:(

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:26 pm
by The Pied Piper
AHEM

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:30 pm
by Tammy
???????????????????????????????????

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:31 pm
by The Pied Piper
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:31 pm
by Tammy
don't be a jerk face!

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:32 pm
by Tammy
Do you have some issue with me trying to get a handle on beeboy and his read on seniors for some reason???

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:32 pm
by The Pied Piper
Tammy wrote:Do you have some issue with me trying to get a handle on beeboy and his read on seniors for some reason???

no this did not factor in at all to my unhappiness

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:33 pm
by Tammy
OMG they were posted like an hour ago or so I believe!!!

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:34 pm
by The Pied Piper
:igmeou:

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:34 pm
by The Pied Piper
Tammy wrote:don't be a jerk face!

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:34 pm
by Tammy
Your apologies are accepted.

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:35 pm
by The Pied Piper
i didn't apologize at all

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:35 pm
by The Pied Piper
i did the opposite of apologize based on my level of offense