Mafiascum.net

In post 560, Dunnstral wrote:Glad nadr popped in to ask a useless question that shows he hasn't read only to disappear immediately

In post 574, Transcend wrote:yeah....

people misspell my name quite a bit on here.

i should make a collage.

In post 443, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 441, Infinity 324 wrote:@smart How does saying that you don't take issue with someone look like a WK? That's my question, obvious it's best to point something out of it does look like WKing.

Because by saying "actually" he's kinda admitting that I'm scummy while calling me town. It seems phrased as though he's defending a popular target (as a WK would), except that I'm not a popular target.

In post 442, Infinity 324 wrote:Also, why ask ira if he has a history of correctly reading me? Is that necessary to have a townread on someone?

No, but I want to know how much I can trust that read/expect that it be accurate, because I know my history of reading you is terrible.

In post 458, Zachstralkita wrote:if im not mistaken Math that amazing confidence you possess, which is actually arrogance, shined brilliantly in Wake's Role Madness where you embarrassed yourself with your reads in regard to myself and Dunnstral's hydra. So did Shaziro.

If anyone cares to know, Dunn said something random offhandedly and those two geniuses turned it into a "mafia crumb" because it was a song lyric. And Dunn said the word blue.

I thought they were joking, but no no no it was a serious read. Which made it even more of a joke to me. But that was the fruit of your genuine detective work.

Yet you're not fazed at all. Really love the tenacity, but it just seems like such a waste. Like you post that, go to work all day, then come back home and still think the same thing? You spent your recreational time formulating bullshit? I'm just telling you in advance, you're going to be sort of disappointed. What is the end result? Because you're not gonna get me lynched. Even if you did, I would flip green. And I think your reads on Dunn and S_S are ludicrous anyway.

Please please please divert your precious precious energy elsewhere, maybe someplace it will be useful. Go wild. Give us some percent equations maybe. Then solve them while we find scum and stuff. I'm telling you, it's gonna be great.

In post 493, Infinity 324 wrote:Oh yeah that ^

PEdit: I'm pretty sure games with encryptors don't mention anything in the rules wrt daytalk

In post 537, Infinity 324 wrote:Also I'm p sure scum have motivation not to make themselves look like idiots

In post 582, Infinity 324 wrote:Only thing it says about daytalk in normal game rules: "Mafia may have daytalk without an Encryptor as long as it is announced in the game's rules beforehand.
"

In post 583, iraonavp wrote:

In post 537, Infinity 324 wrote:Also I'm p sure scum have motivation not to make themselves look like idiots

I know, seems like Mathblade is town-aligned.

In post 585, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 583, iraonavp wrote:

In post 537, Infinity 324 wrote:Also I'm p sure scum have motivation not to make themselves look like idiots

I know, seems like Mathblade is town-aligned.

Haha

Says the guy who intentionally tries to look dumb as scum

Whether scum not having natural daytalk is mentioned or not, there can always be an encryptor or not. I really don't know why dunn said there was

In post 587, Creature wrote:Not lurking because I am scum, it's because it's so hard to get a read there.

In post 588, Creature wrote:If you think Zach selfvoting is town, take a look at Micro 601, RC did basically the same thing.

In post 586, iraonavp wrote:VOTE: Creature

Seems like a good vote.

In post 591, iraonavp wrote:

In post 588, Creature wrote:If you think Zach selfvoting is town, take a look at Micro 601, RC did basically the same thing.

It's clearly a joke vote, you know...

In post 588, Creature wrote:If you think Zach selfvoting is town, take a look at Micro 601, RC did basically the same thing.

In post 589, iraonavp wrote:Since if there wasn't an encryptor, maybe inspectorscout would say there is no daytalk.

In post 592, Transcend wrote:

In post 586, iraonavp wrote:VOTE: Creature

Seems like a good vote.

thank the lord

In post 596, iraonavp wrote:Okay, you're scum-aligned then.