Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:13 pm
ummmm no.In post 573, Dunnstral wrote:This post was anger baiting by fire, if you guys didn't catch onIn post 449, Firebringer wrote:i think i have the highest success rate next to rc in reading u
Page 24 of 134
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:14 pm
are you mei or mercy this game?In post 570, Elsa Jay wrote:Because I cant wait until day 4 this game to get mislynched like last time we battled.
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:14 pm
Then we can't do the plan at all, or else we have to adjust it to whatever they want to doIn post 572, Auro wrote:But Dunnstral, these people are also not willing to let go of the sword -- so what then?
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:14 pm
not really.In post 568, DVa wrote:Do you find Elsa's posts townie?In post 565, Firebringer wrote:i don't find anything elsa posted to be scummy.
in case anyone was wondering.
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:16 pm
The current meta is shite. So screw it, I'll go Pharah.In post 576, DVa wrote:are you mei or mercy this game?In post 570, Elsa Jay wrote:Because I cant wait until day 4 this game to get mislynched like last time we battled.
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:18 pm
Well you didn't literally claim scum again so I guess that's a good sign
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:18 pm
Yeah, it's not likely ALL of them are scum -- so if we leave it to those three, it's equivalent to picking a town leader who's gonna hold the sword, except for UTIn post 577, Dunnstral wrote:Then we can't do the plan at all, or else we have to adjust it to whatever they want to doIn post 572, Auro wrote:But Dunnstral, these people are also not willing to let go of the sword -- so what then?
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:19 pm
In post 575, Firebringer wrote:ummmm no.In post 573, Dunnstral wrote:This post was anger baiting by fire, if you guys didn't catch onIn post 449, Firebringer wrote:i think i have the highest success rate next to rc in reading u
ummmm yes, actually.
These posts in Witch's halloween ball:
In post 2626, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:The game was to abuse RC's arrogance and attempt to get Short into the last pairing. I feel like maybe if Short plays it right and doesn't replace out it maybe works. I just knew neither Fire nor I were living to endgame in a game where RC is Innocent Child, regardless of either of our alignments tbh.
So I just played to ruin every connective tell in the fucking game. And I did a pretty ok job at it.
In post 2630, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Anyway, gg town. I'd love to play scum in a game where I don't have to deal with a dictator who will literally never allow me anywhere near his town block even if I was town.
It's why I was so hoping Short would stick the game out and win so I could shove it in RC's face that I conned him into letting a fucking newbie like Short get past his VAUNTED SCUMHUNTING SKILLS.
Followed up by:In post 2485, Dunnstral wrote:-RCHow about you start expecting LLD to be a human being then tell me to get over myself.
Is trolling/anger baitingIn post 449, Firebringer wrote:i think i have the highest success rate next to rc in reading u
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:20 pm
No, they won't be town leader, they'll be innocent child
It's not the same thing
We don't need a town leader and someone being unclaimed sword-holder will not make them 'town leader' when the reason we let them claim in the first place was them being scummy
and if UT gets the sword the issue self-resolves anyway, so stop worrying about it Auro wtf
It's not the same thing
We don't need a town leader and someone being unclaimed sword-holder will not make them 'town leader' when the reason we let them claim in the first place was them being scummy
and if UT gets the sword the issue self-resolves anyway, so stop worrying about it Auro wtf
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:21 pm
Yeah it's just like DVa says, just because someone is confirmed town doesn't mean we should listen to everything they say, good insight there
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:22 pm
@DVa: Their holding the sword discards any sword passing strategy town would want to adopt. Say it falls to Varsoon -- what then?
I said "Except UT" in my post.
@Dunn: Except the swordholder singlehandedly forces us to discard certain strategies. They don't need to lead the town in terms of reads. But can lock strategies.
I said "Except UT" in my post.
@Dunn: Except the swordholder singlehandedly forces us to discard certain strategies. They don't need to lead the town in terms of reads. But can lock strategies.
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:23 pm
I'd personally challenge thee wielder if they are shitty enough. You don't get to keep the sword if you hurt the game.
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:23 pm
@Elsa: By lynching them?
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:24 pm
Elsa what do you think of LLD and UT rn?
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:24 pm
Oh nevermind.
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:24 pm
Well they're sword-proof, not lynch proof. So yeah.
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:24 pm
Why would town vote for potential scum as opposed to an Innocent Child?In post 586, Elsa Jay wrote:I'd personally challenge thee wielder if they are shitty enough. You don't get to keep the sword if you hurt the game.
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:24 pm
But you really think people are going to lynch confirmed town?
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:25 pm
agreed, and even if one doesn't give up the sword it still gives our nobles a protector for us all, if they decide to vig and their not Arthur they die anyhow and are forced to give up the sword so either way should still work for us.
the question then remains if the three are the sword claimants then who does battle today?
the question then remains if the three are the sword claimants then who does battle today?
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:26 pm
In post 591, Auro wrote:Why would town vote for potential scum as opposed to an Innocent Child?In post 586, Elsa Jay wrote:I'd personally challenge thee wielder if they are shitty enough. You don't get to keep the sword if you hurt the game.
Wouldn't*, sorry.
I don't think any reasonable town would vote the IC just because "shitty" lol.
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:26 pm
Veridian, who is scum?
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:27 pm
Lady is just one of those guys I lynch because I dont like the personality sometimes. Like how we lynched BEF for floundering super hard.In post 588, DVa wrote:Elsa what do you think of LLD and UT rn?
Well I don't know. You tell me.Auro wrote:Why would town vote for potential scum as opposed to an Innocent Child?In post 586, Elsa Jay wrote:I'd personally challenge thee wielder if they are shitty enough. You don't get to keep the sword if you hurt the game.
If They are shitty and hurting the game, yes.Dunnstral wrote:But you really think people are going to lynch confirmed town?
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:27 pm
it actually isn't.In post 582, Dunnstral wrote:ummmm yes, actually.
and i wrote a huge long post of why, but i don't think its worth getting into.
let me for a second pretend your point has merit: (because really i think you saying i am baiting is gross but maybe we can talk about that somewhere else)
do you think I am scum for "baiting" lld?
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:27 pm
no "we" with me, I wasn't on that wagonIn post 596, Elsa Jay wrote:Like how we lynched BEF for floundering super hard.
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:28 pm
I think you get scumpoints for that, yeah.In post 597, Firebringer wrote:do you think I am scum for "baiting" lld?