Page 24 of 109

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 10:46 pm
by NerfedBuJ


Maybe you're right...
Either way no big loss losing him.

I think chemist lynch would be better though

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 11:05 pm
by CheekyTeeky
Hi peeps I'm back will catch up soon.

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 11:20 pm
by CheekyTeeky
In post 511, Arkham Asylum wrote:Binary Star, Pine
Help me see Binary, Pine and smurfedBuj as town?

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 11:20 pm
by CheekyTeeky
Is it just me or is mastina acting weird? Like not scummy but just very outside any meta I'm familiar with.

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 11:24 pm
by CheekyTeeky
In post 518, Dannflor wrote:[binary, chemist, pine]
[bujaber, AA, cheeky]
[egix]
-----
[zzzx, chickadee]
[deb]

is about where I'm at rnow

mastina and FL are big ?? for me
Your top row are interesting? I'm starting to feel a bit consensus-y now.

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 11:24 pm
by CheekyTeeky
In post 519, Flavor Leaf wrote:im flavor leaf
Lock town.

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 11:26 pm
by CheekyTeeky
In post 534, Pine wrote:You know, it’s not the fluff that I find objectionable, it’s that you’re not taking this seriously.
I find this very amusing considering the one game I've played with you.

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 11:49 pm
by CheekyTeeky
In post 551, Chemist1422 wrote:TL;DR don't hammer yet until we get more content out of the slots that haven't given much
So pure. So towny.

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 11:52 pm
by CheekyTeeky
Deb wagon is meh as it seems too easy

Binary feel slimy af.

VOTE: Binary

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 11:59 pm
by Arkham Asylum
In post 537, Flavor Leaf wrote:I just feel like this isn’t his scum game.

He’d be more aggro fluff if he was
In post 551, Chemist1422 wrote:Anyway I don't like this DEB wagon, I think he's acting more confrontational than scum needs to
In post 569, Egix96 wrote:Thing is, I was actually considering unvoting Debbie yesterday because I was starting to feel stubborn town vibes from him.
In post 572, NerfedBuJ wrote:I think since it's a big wagon, like an almost done deal, the fact that he is not defending himself but some people are defending him is probably town indicative.
In post 583, CheekyTeeky wrote:Deb wagon is meh as it seems too easy
:neutral:

-The Joker

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2019 12:00 am
by CheekyTeeky
I don't get your point?

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2019 12:23 am
by Binary Star
In post 583, CheekyTeeky wrote:Deb wagon is meh as it seems too easy

Binary feel slimy af.

VOTE: Binary
And you feel ugly.

-B

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2019 12:34 am
by CheekyTeeky
No need to get personal :o

Why do you think DEB is scum?

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2019 12:47 am
by Binary Star
I have no idea what any of his reads are. Since the Chick vote he has offered nothing.

-B

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2019 12:56 am
by CheekyTeeky
Yeah his ISO is garbage but his "I don't like being told what to do" attitude vibes with me.
I have on idea how many times LHF like this flip town because people can't understand that anti-town!=scum.
If we get near deadline I'll hammer that but I think we have bigger fish to fry.

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2019 1:11 am
by Arkham Asylum
In post 589, CheekyTeeky wrote:I have on idea how many times LHF like this flip town because people can't understand that anti-town!=scum.
It's not
just
that he has a flippant attitude, the non-fluff posts in his ISO actually carry scum equity. Agree?
His attitude also comes off as forced and awkward.
He's refusing to play the game. If he started to give reads and put in some effort, town would re-evaluate.

Consciously anti-town deserves rope IMO. :P

-The Joker

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2019 1:19 am
by CheekyTeeky
In post 590, Arkham Asylum wrote:the non-fluff posts in his ISO actually carry scum equity
Can I have an example?

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2019 1:25 am
by Pine
In post 578, CheekyTeeky wrote:Is it just me or is mastina acting weird? Like not scummy but just very outside any meta I'm familiar with.
She's being weird site-wide, afaict
In post 581, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 534, Pine wrote:You know, it’s not the fluff that I find objectionable, it’s that you’re not taking this seriously.
I find this very amusing considering the one game I've played with you.
A) One game is pretty poor evidence for meta
B) Which game was that, so I know what you're talking about?
In post 582, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 551, Chemist1422 wrote:TL;DR don't hammer yet until we get more content out of the slots that haven't given much
So pure. So towny.
So fakeable.

I don't have a SR on Chemist, but don't give him credit for something so easily faked.

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2019 1:27 am
by Pine
In post 438, Pine wrote:
In post 23, Dr Easy Bake wrote:
In post 21, Chemist1422 wrote:I have a bad snap wolfread on Easy Bake for copying my RVS reasoning
I mean I didn’t copy you. I planned my RVS once I saw the player list. Didn’t read your reasoning till you just mentioned it.
I think you’re the one copying me by way of time travel! So you should already know my alignment!
Planning RVS is hella scummy.
In post 246, Dr Easy Bake wrote:
In post 243, Chickadee wrote:I'm not. You're all fools.

But I would not mind having to not deal with the gimmick posting so much.
I’m really not digging the ‘tude you’ve got going here VOTE: Chickadee
This comes off as self-serving and a fluffy reason to slime his way onto the Chickadee wagon.
In post 370, Dr Easy Bake wrote:That big ass Arkham post is way too long, scummy vibes from long posts for sure.
This was the first thing that actually vibed me about DEB.

Also, the ISO in general makes me want to consider a policy lynch, but for-reals PLs are so 2013.

PE: Yeah, BuJ, I'm already done :lol:
These three posts stood out to me as scummy, aside from fluff.

And what you're calling Townish stubbornness, I'm calling scum bluffing.

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2019 1:30 am
by Chemist1422
In post 570, NerfedBuJ wrote:Why day 2 when we can do it now

VOTE: Chemist

I feel he's much less involved than open 755.
Post 551 is after some break but it is mostly stating some very uncontroversial, easy to come up with, LAMIST things that don't actually tell us much about him or any of the slots he mentioned.

Also the RVS posting kinda sounds like a cheeky scum entrance.
Open 755 was 2FC9 right?

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2019 3:20 am
by Arkham Asylum
In post 578, CheekyTeeky wrote:Is it just me or is mastina acting weird? Like not scummy but just very outside any meta I'm familiar with.
Ivy leans NAi but I have a bit of a tl.

~Harley

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2019 3:40 am
by CheekyTeeky
This game

Ok I think Pine has a good(s) point(s).

VOTE: DEB

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2019 4:14 am
by Chickadee
In post 564, Flavor Leaf wrote:Disagree. It’s a great reason to believe he’s town.

He’s aggro fluff
In post 567, Flavor Leaf wrote:Yeah, but in this case, it is. Im adapting to what i feel he’d be doing and/or aware by analytical prowess.
How do you feel about the fact that DEB seems to be very aware this isn't his scum meta. He's been quick to point it out himself that he wouldn't act this way as scum.

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2019 4:43 am
by Pine
In post 596, CheekyTeeky wrote:This game

Ok I think Pine has a good(s) point(s).

VOTE: DEB
Oh fuck, that game.

Umm, two things.

First, Product Placement was rather meme-y. It didn't lend itself to being taken seriously, and IIRC the balance of the players didn't either. This is a more typical game, and most people are taking this seriously. Yes, there's a gimmick, but it's not as meme-y and hasn't actually kicked in yet.

Second, look at the damn page count. I'm an old school player. Five, six, seven years ago, it was rare for a Mini to break 40-50 pages or a Large to break 100. Most were in the 30-40/70-80 range. That's over the course of a whole game. People didn't shitpost nearly as much, and when they did, it was usually a lot funnier. This game is pretty slow and sedate by modern standards, thank Mith. Today's games are
hard to read
. There are easily 3-4 times as many posts as are actually needed, and most of them are low-content. Gone are the days of thoughtful, considered wallposting. Hell, it's considered a little scummy to do so now, like "what's his angle?" Umm, gamesolving please and thank you. I digress. Where this affects me directly is
interest
and
effort
levels.

I am not an early game player, I like the midgame. Once there's a flip or two out there, some wagon analysis to be done, a few claims and maybe a PR result, that's where I shine. I loathe the early game. There are exceptions, where I get a hunch on D1 and hang on tight, but they're less common than a "Can we just get through this" attitude. Even in Product Placement, a meme-y, high traffic game where I wasn't really engaged, I lampshaded what I was doing. I followed along, and I made an effort to care. And when I saw something that I needed to address, I stated an opinion, slapped down a real vote, and did shit. I can't quote it because the thread's locked, but look at this progression of posts. They might be a little cherry-picked to prove my point, but prove it they do. Perhaps not coincidentally, your obvious scumminess was what pulled me into the game (even though I was wrong, and it was TvT. IIRC I eventually realized I was wrong before end of D1, though maybe that's because actual-scum Vecna turned my head.)

In contrast, I see zero evidence of give-a-fuck from DEB. Either he's scum trying to bluff his way past suspicion, or he's an actual detriment to Town. Either way, I'm happy with him as a D1 lynch unless something significant changes the gamestate (like a Vecna or w/e).

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2019 4:44 am
by Pine
Ummm, that waxed long, but it was a good question deserving of a serious answer. And I do like talking about myself.

*smokebomb*