Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2019 1:52 am
You weren't at L-1 yesterday either
French Toast is best fuck off with that pancake and waffle shitIn post 90, Datisi wrote:In post 88, Emperor flippyNips wrote:I think scums talking about how waffles are better than pancakeswhat the fuck is wrong with you
In post 574, Alisae wrote:VOTE: Luca BlightIn post 85, Luca Blight wrote:I haven’t played Mafia for ages but I can’t ever remember seeing a specified townbloc - usually there comes a point where you naturally start trying to work with the people you strongly believe are Town - it’s rarely something that needs highlighting in of itself.
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
I mean, it's not that hard for town to give their thoughts on wagon. Scum benefit most from dodging this question so ur not really helping your case if ur town.In post 577, Datisi wrote:True, but my opinion hasn't changed much.
oh u have no ideaIn post 159, Datisi wrote:You do know that most of the time, Town players don't purposefully mislynch?
thats a good post there misterIn post 160, Emperor flippyNips wrote:I’m not buying the billy thing. He’s got a D1 pass from me. Rn it feels like Tchill is trying to take attention away from himself & nit pick on a newbie
Ok, but here's thing.In post 580, Iconeum wrote:I mean, it's not that hard for town to give their thoughts on wagon. Scum benefit most from dodging this question so ur not really helping your case if ur town.In post 577, Datisi wrote:True, but my opinion hasn't changed much.
VOTE: Luca BlightIn post 224, Luca Blight wrote:Looking over Datisi's ISO - it's full of game theory chat and passive questioning - this is where my slightly below null read originates from. The only real point of interest is 99 - Would scum do such a 'test'? Looking back at it, it felt a bit unnecessary of Datisi because Billy's answer to Klick's original question already provided the 'townslip'. I think I'm leaning towards this being an act from scum who are at a loss of what to do, so choose to do something that appears to be useful Town work, with the additional benefit of getting a Townie onside (which, if this scenario is accurate, would have been successful given Pilgrims TR of Datisi).
This is still very much a work in progress, but my reads are something like this at the moment:
Tchill
Klick
Pilgrim, Icon, Flippy,
Datisi
Incidentally, Flippy's reaction to the same incident looked pretty genuine, which is why I've put him around the null level. I actually dislike such tests as it causes me to doubt myself; such reactions can look so effective, yet be so easily faked by a good player
Ah yes, except I'm at L-1 now.In post 585, Iconeum wrote:having shit arguments yesterday means nothing.
In post 584, Alisae wrote:VOTE: Luca BlightIn post 224, Luca Blight wrote:Looking over Datisi's ISO - it's full of game theory chat and passive questioning - this is where my slightly below null read originates from. The only real point of interest is 99 - Would scum do such a 'test'? Looking back at it, it felt a bit unnecessary of Datisi because Billy's answer to Klick's original question already provided the 'townslip'. I think I'm leaning towards this being an act from scum who are at a loss of what to do, so choose to do something that appears to be useful Town work, with the additional benefit of getting a Townie onside (which, if this scenario is accurate, would have been successful given Pilgrims TR of Datisi).
This is still very much a work in progress, but my reads are something like this at the moment:
Tchill
Klick
Pilgrim, Icon, Flippy,
Datisi
Incidentally, Flippy's reaction to the same incident looked pretty genuine, which is why I've put him around the null level. I actually dislike such tests as it causes me to doubt myself; such reactions can look so effective, yet be so easily faked by a good player
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
VOTE: Luca Blight
not because you had shit argumentsIn post 586, Datisi wrote:Ah yes, except I'm at L-1 now.In post 585, Iconeum wrote:having shit arguments yesterday means nothing.
yeah ur townIn post 302, Almost50 wrote:All caught up.. but I dunno whom I want to vote.
VOTE: Kop
Maybe this for now. I need more content from you,MrHerr Klopp
VOTE: Luca BlightIn post 318, Luca Blight wrote:Going over Klick's Iso.
40 - I agree with Icon that there is nothing particularly wrong with changing your RVS vote to another RVS vote - it's actually quite a usual thing in my experience. I've seen RVS' that last like three pages with random votes flying back and forth. I'm generally not a fan of RVS myself but I believe there can be bit and pieces learnt from it. Anyway, I'm not reading much into this as Klick was seemingly trying to create some real content, which is quite natural.
51 - This felt Town. I feel scum, whether sober or not, would be more likely to avoid drawing such attention to themselves here. Klick's grammar and language remains pretty much on point, so I doubt he could have been too intoxicated, but the fact he didn't misspell words etc in a way adds to its authenticity (I always cringe when I see 'drunken' posts where the player exaggerates their condition by writing a load of nonsense).
55 - Asks Billy what he thinks scum are talking about. It turns out (122) that Klick was aware that scum have no day chat. Klick follows up the question in 78 and then immediately unvotes Pilgrim following his response. He also doesn't immediately reveal (or try to take credit for) his test. This feels like a really natural progression.
82 - Talks of a townblock, including himself. That would be some pretty gutsy scum work right there.
He hasn't done as much in recent times, but I think I've seen enough to get a fairly solid Town read here.
WOWIn post 341, Datisi wrote:Alright, here's where I am right now: (most to least town)
Billy- I feel like he's playing like classic Town!Billy. Plus, I think scum!Billy would've tried to pocket me (rather than downgrading his TR), especially as my lynch is starting to get more and more likely.
Klick- Still having the same vibes from him as in the beginning.
A50- Granted, we've been in the game together for only a short while, so this is subject to change, but he seems towny so far. Plus I can feel being confused about reads.
Tchill- He feels genuine, at least enough for D1.
Icon- I know posting gifs and fooling around is his style, but he seems to be almost pushing it.
Emperor- I don't see why such activity couldn't be coming from scum who's purposefully trying to have such a playstyle.
Luca- Their posts seem... fake? I can't explain it well, but I just feel their posts are so devoid of life, like they're cold and calculated. It could be just their playstyle, but it's giving me bad vibes.
Kop- I mean, yeah.
While I'm fine with voting Kop here, they feel like low-hanging fruit, so I'm gonna VOTE: Luca
bruuuuuhIn post 417, Luca Blight wrote:Do you have any thoughts on anything relevant I’ve said all game?In post 413, Datisi wrote:Did you read my response to 366?In post 405, Tchill13 wrote: This is good to see.
pedit @Luca: I don't have a problem with the content itself, as I said the tone/style is what threw me off.
pedit @Tchill:Tchill13 wrote:If I'm assuming thatdatisi and iconeumare scum.?Tchill13 wrote:Kop and iconseem like the type of scum that would just want a lynch to get by, without necessarily playing for the endgame.
ok icon im pretty much caught upIn post 587, Iconeum wrote:I'll just wait until you get to the good stuff
I'm also kinda interested in your opinion on Icon/Datisi from the last 5? ish pagesIn post 595, Alisae wrote:ok icon im pretty much caught upIn post 587, Iconeum wrote:I'll just wait until you get to the good stuff
what were you refering here that would make Luca not scum?
lead wagon trashIn post 597, Iconeum wrote:I'm also kinda interested in your opinion on Icon/Datisi from the last 5? ish pagesIn post 595, Alisae wrote:ok icon im pretty much caught upIn post 587, Iconeum wrote:I'll just wait until you get to the good stuff
what were you refering here that would make Luca not scum?
Datisi is at L-1, you should probably take a stance on the lead wagon if ur caught up