Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 11:03 am
I don't think it's necessary for me to say who I targetted last night. It won't give us a conftown.
It wouldn't unless your scum.In post 575, Kraeg wrote:I don't think it's necessary for me to say who I targetted last night. It won't give us a conftown.
fixedIn post 576, Garmr wrote:It wouldn't hurt unless your scum.In post 575, Kraeg wrote:I don't think it's necessary for me to say who I targetted last night. It won't give us a conftown.
yeah this is pretty weak. What does scum me achieve with this? I think you are scum so I did that to force the lynch through. I wouldn't of called it off if not for the combined fact Mohan,you and Billy acted strange. Mohan just turned out to be trash.In post 574, Kraeg wrote:I'm going to go for LAL today. I understand Garmr was trying to drive everyone to lynch me by lying as the JK. It's very unnecessary considering the fact that the reason for lynching me was weak. The whole wagon was hinged on a gut feeling. It's not like Garmr is a Cop who got a Guilty result on me for him to drive everyone that way. Besides, he was claiming JK.
So for me LAL
VOTE: Garmr
9p role madness,,,, with 2 VT flipsIn post 583, profii wrote:So Kraeg maintains that there can be a Rb and a Jk but also notes I can be an Ic
He must think this is 9p role madness
I also think he doesn't want to guess his supposed rb target incase that player counter claims with an actual result
To clarify I have to formally ask for my town status to be verified so ill just do that when people start to vote meIn post 573, Kraeg wrote: And I thought profi will be confirmed as Inno Child today. I didn't see that happen.
In post 586, profii wrote:To clarify I have to formally ask for my town status to be verified so ill just do that when people start to vote meIn post 573, Kraeg wrote: And I thought profi will be confirmed as Inno Child today. I didn't see that happen.
You just named a three person potential scum pool. Why are you so confident that that's not a possibility? I'm not saying anything at this point. In my mind, Profii pinged me hard at the end of D1 when he cased me on a misrep. Now, I don't know if that was a mistake or genuine, but at the moment, it felt off. So I don't know for sure that scum was on that Mohab wagon, and that self-hammer makes that conclusion harder.In post 561, Garmr wrote:You are saying both wagons are are all town and the entire scum teams is between swollen emperor numpty and profii.?In post 559, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Why are you so confident there's one scum on Mohab's wagon?In post 557, Garmr wrote:In post 285, Jackal711 wrote:VOTE COUNT 1.7
Mohab500 (1) - Billy Pilgrim
Skellen (0) -
Luca Blight (2) -Garmr, Emperor FlippyNips
Garmr (0) -
Emperor FlippyNips (0) -
profii (0) -
NorwegianboyEE (1) - Kraeg
Kraeg (4) -L-1NorwegianboyEE, Mohab500,Skellen, profii
Billy Pilgrim (1) -
Not Voting: Luca Blight
ACTIVITY NOTES:
Luca Blight is V/LA through Monday, Sept 9
Skellen has been prodded.
With 9 alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
Day 1 deadline is Friday, September 13th at 10:00 am PDT which is in(expired on 2019-09-13 10:00:00)In post 318, Jackal711 wrote:VOTE COUNT 1.8
Mohab500(1) - Billy Pilgrim
Skellen (0) -
Luca Blight (0) -
Garmr (0) -
Emperor FlippyNips (0) -
profii (0) -
NorwegianboyEE(1) - Kraeg[/color]
L-1Kraeg (4) -NorwegianboyEE, Mohab500, Skellen,Garmr
Billy Pilgrim (0) -
Not Voting: Luca Blight, Emperor FlippyNips, profiiIn post 491, Jackal711 wrote:VOTE COUNT 1.13
L-1Mohab500(4) - Billy Pilgrim, Kraeg, Luca Blight,Garmr
Skellen (0) -
Luca Blight (0) -
Garmr (0) -
Emperor FlippyNips (0) -
profii (0) -
NorwegianboyEE (0) -
Kraeg (2) -Mohab5NorwegianboyEE
Billy Pilgrim (0) - 00,
Not Voting: Emperor FlippyNips, Skellen, profii
ACTIVITY NOTES:
All is good!
With 9 alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
Day 1 deadline is Friday, September 13th at 10:00 am PDT which is in(expired on 2019-09-13 10:00:00)
Hmm the first two are interesting. Me and profii are in the same position on two different vote counts but the situation is different.
Profii jumps off because of the roleclaim while I Jump on. I think skellen is town so from my pov the entire wagon on kreag is town. So profii should either be really suspicious of skellen or kreag since he seems to town read me. Becuase if kreag is town at the point Profii was on multiple people could of hammered and easily of used the excuse but Kreag roleclaim was scummy. Also while kreag himself acted like both roles could coexist so did Billy. While not what scum should do Kreag has been weird all game and I don't think we should treat him as standard.
There's atleast one scum on mohabs wagon. The candidates are kreag, Luca and billy. Kreags really starting to tick all the scum boxes on reflecting on how events played out.
VOTE: Kreag
Mod Edit: Fixed broken quote tags
You should say because if we mass claim it will be useful information.In post 575, Kraeg wrote:I don't think it's necessary for me to say who I targetted last night. It won't give us a conftown.
I see, that explanation looks good enough for me. I wasn't sure where to put you regarding the Mohab wagon as I tend to consider people part of the wagon when they show intent to move there, especially if everything gets cut off with something surprising like that self-hammer. I was wondering if the Mohab wagon was actively or passively scumdriven (post-claims), but everytime I look at it to draw some conclusions out of it everything leads back to the question what Kraeg's alignment is. This lynch feels kind of inevitable.In post 584, profii wrote: I couldn't really make head nor tail or garmr vs kraeg and I was probably scared of lynching the 1 PR between them, so I was kinda hoping mohab said something really scummy about kraeg/garmr to settle my mind that everyone else was right and my meta check was not as strong a reason to not vote compared to everyone on the wagons reason to vote
So a bit compromise and a bit avoiding risk of PR loss I guess but if he had said something logical I would have restrained and defended it too i guess