Mafiascum.net

UNVOTE:

Well it seems like 2 out of the 3 people on my scumdar are conf town. Unless someone counterclaims, though I doubt scum team would be dumb enough to claim masons D1. Maybe it makes my ego feel slightly better that they were secret buddies with their own secret PT.

Need some time to re-read and analyze everything.

Whats the case on Bailey?

Or Skitter for that matter... But I know that's not going to happen anytime soon.

In post 574, GeorgeBailey wrote:Er, Why exactly? I knew the two biggest wagons were town getting lynched on shaky ground. And it still is. I have no problem voting Zenith or Suspicious. How am I more suspicious than Zenith exactly?

You still want to vote for Suspicious?

I'll consolidate on Bailey, that is the more sure route.

VOTE: Bailey

In post 577, Zenith wrote:You still want to vote for Suspicious?

Well yeah, his constant berating. His ego vote. But It doesn't matter much. seems like people have their mind set on me right now. Especially Vork, who.... Town read me, then voted for me?? Where's the defense buddy?

I guess I should have just voted on one of the wagons instead of defending them lmao. They were both just kinda shitty though. Would rather vote someone I think is scum than vote a town out for the sake of lynching.

VOTE: Suspicious

I'm surprised you're the one asking the questions before my lynch, since I was trying to vote you out the entire time Zenith. So you at least deserve credit for that.

In post 551, Jamelia wrote:

In post 547, Jamelia wrote:Ok we talked and this is getting out of hand.

Suspicious and I are masons. Feel free to be pissed off but lynch one of us and the other dies tonight, you lose both of your PR’s in 1 day.

Also just want to make sure this is seen so hello

bad vote
strike 2

Vork looking like the partner here.

The partner who's starting the wagon?

well damn

both of u so scummy though

In post 550, Jamelia wrote:

In post 523, january wrote:well hello george
way to split the vote even more

gonna go run some errands i’ll be back in a bit

unvoting for now i think there’s a chance jam might be just a town crumbling under pressure, gonna give them a chance to respond and make decision later

UNVOTE:

Oh my god. Shove it with this “town crumbling under pressure” BS. Y’all came up with (and are still driving) this meta-driven scenario that I purposefully let someone stay on L-1 because I “checked the website and wouldn’t allow this to happen”. If that’s the strongest scum read you have against me then your scum-sussing skills are disasterous

mate i never ever ever said i fossed you for checking the website or whatever the meta read was

that was tictac and if you can quote me saying that than by all means feel free to lynch me

i townread tictac for making that read EVEN THOUGH I DISAGREED WITH IT

i fossed you for your RESPONSE to tictac's read NOT BASED ON of tictac's read

you're lucky you're clear lmao you're misrepresenting every single thing i say and just refusing to read

I wouldn't have minded dying to prove you wrong. You're just an ass.

anyways

In post 586, Suspicious wrote:I wouldn't have minded dying to prove you wrong. You're just an ass.

Literally how I feel at this point lol. It’s like their ego can’t handle being wrong

In post 552, Jamelia wrote:I think that January & Fancy(before DrD) were hiding behind Tic’s meta-driven scumread and went for it. Once I VL/A’d and Tic was off of me,

they moved onto different targets

since mine was off me. DrD came in and stuck up for me, while tic went back on me immediately and January followed.

what... where... please explain where i "moved onto different target" when you went VL/A (btw the answer is: i never did)

i literally only backed off of you yesterday and that's... while tictac was still trying to lynch you lmao

so no i'm was never "following" tictac

anyways i realize i'm picking a fight with a clear for no reason but i'm just really really amazed at how easy Jamelia just... makes up things...

good thing you're dying soon

so you actually don't think you were scummy at all.

neither of you.

lol.

In post 579, GeorgeBailey wrote:

In post 577, Zenith wrote:You still want to vote for Suspicious?

Well yeah, his constant berating. His ego vote. But It doesn't matter much. seems like people have their mind set on me right now. Especially Vork, who.... Town read me, then voted for me?? Where's the defense buddy?

I guess I should have just voted on one of the wagons instead of defending them lmao. They were both just kinda shitty though. Would rather vote someone I think is scum than vote a town out for the sake of lynching.

VOTE: Suspicious

Umm I'm confused. Does that mean you are counterclaiming? Because if not, why are you voting confirmed town this close to deadline?

In post 591, Zenith wrote:confirmed town

Confirmed town? What makes him confirmed town?

hes mason with jamelia

mason is conf town

oh boy

i'm probably jumping on the george wagon in a bit but my reads got a little shaken so i'm gonna try to reread

In post 590, january wrote:so you actually don't think you were scummy at all.

neither of you.

lol.

I think we weren’t cooperating with what was illogical game analysis. At least from my POV

little bit of a meta read but if george is maf here then his partner is definitely not online atm because this isn't playing dumb this is actually fullblown obliviousness

In post 596, Jamelia wrote:

In post 590, january wrote:so you actually don't think you were scummy at all.

neither of you.

lol.

I think we weren’t cooperating with what was illogical game analysis. At least from my POV

meh like i said tictac's analysis was mostly illogical but i still stand by my analysis

cmon you got to realize that you were more than a little bit scummy from an outsider POV

I know, but that doesn't confirm them.

UNVOTE: .

I guess we gotta wait for DDL and Skitter to swoop in for the final vote.