Page 24 of 115

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:10 pm
by emps
In post 300, Datisi wrote:
In post 295, Wimpy wrote:I don't see anyone else being asked where else they have played.
that's because the rest of us don't have an account that's 2 weeks old while also claiming 200+ games under our belt

@Mena eli5 the perspective slips because I'm not seeing it rn
also that's a terrible fucking guess
yeah, not really seeing them either

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:10 pm
by emps
In post 301, Wimpy wrote:
In post 293, Datisi wrote:
In post 285, Datisi wrote:And like
it's not like it's just Mena BuLlYiNg you, other people are asking about your past experience as well
it's something that helps with a read on you

why are you so adamant in ignoring us about it?
because it is irrelevant to this game
lmao no it isnt

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:15 pm
by Alduskkel
In post 572, Wimpy wrote:I don’t care if you scum read me but you do need to have a good reason.
You should care if I scumread you because if you're town and get lynched that hurts the rest of your team too.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:16 pm
by emps
yeah no seriously what site did you come from that gives this little of a shit about teamwork

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:22 pm
by emps
blah blah blah more fucking technicalities that no one could give less of a shit about

no seriously what the fuck

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:23 pm
by emps
In post 350, Wimpy wrote:
In post 347, Datisi wrote:But how is "evidence suggesting (emphasis on suggesting) someone is scum" different than "someone being scummy"?

Like if someone is being scummy
Sure, it's not given that they're scum
But there is *something* that makes them look like it
And that *something*
Is evidence
Suggesting
(again emphasis on suggesting)
They're scum
Sorry you’re still wrong. Just cause somebody does something that is perceived scummy doesn’t suggest that person could be scum.

Take lurking for example. Anyone who lurks is scummy. I would never say I have evidence to suggest they are scum for it.
lurking is NAI but ok

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
by Alduskkel
I feel like there's a lot of cognitive dissonance in Wimpy's posting. There's "I don't care if you scumread me but I'm also going to spam the thread with posts explaining why you shouldn't be scumreading me" and also "I think Datisi is scummy but I didn't call her scum it was just a page 2 vote that I said was serious."

Also yes it would be relevant to know where you've played before Wimpy.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:25 pm
by emps
In post 356, Wimpy wrote:
In post 352, Datisi wrote:Didn't say it was
You said it was scummy
Actually this is a lie. I never said referencing other games is scummy. Bringing in grudges and voting somebody is
hold up, let me find somewhere where he said that referencing other games was scummy

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:25 pm
by emps
In post 53, Wimpy wrote:
In post 49, Menalque wrote:Interesting

Why was it serious?
Cause I dislike when people come in and reference past games and vote them for it. It violates site rules and is scummy.
oh shit i found it already that was pretty quick

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:28 pm
by emps
In post 366, Wimpy wrote:
In post 363, Datisi wrote:
In post 53, Wimpy wrote:Cause I dislike when people come in and
reference past games
and vote them for it. It violates site rules and is
scummy
.
You literally did
I was referencing my original reason of perceived rule violating but if you want to play the semantics game also. Sure I said it there.

Linking other games to show how you’re fundamentally incorrect in your thinking isn’t meta and isn’t scummy.

The fact that we’re even having this discussion outside of a newbie game is mind boggling to me.
oh boy back to the whole

"you said this"

"lmao no i didnt"

"uh but you did right here"

*calls it a misrep or outright ignores it*

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:28 pm
by emps
In post 368, Datisi wrote:
In post 366, Wimpy wrote:The fact that we’re even having this discussion outside of a newbie game is mind boggling to me.
Speaking of which

Why aren't you playing there

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:30 pm
by alimdia
In post 209, emps wrote:
In post 55, Wimpy wrote:Plus he suggested I eat a salad. Only scum would do that.
man what a serious vote

only scum eat salads

i shouldve known

VOTE: datisi

die scum die
wtf? on page like 8. Its worse when I realise you are doing these posts when YOU HAVEN'T CAUGHT UP READING YET.
For all you know datisi could have been on L-1 and you just hammered.
why are we still talking about burgers (emps mainly) on page fucking 9-10
Also, MAKE ONE BIG POST INSTEAD OF 20 SMALL POSTS WHILE YOU ARE CATCHING UP ON READING FFS.
When reading page 5, you dont know what happened in the next 5 pages, maybe they retracted what they said.....
And yes.. you can read all posts without responding to latest posts. I literally just did that and didn't clog up the thread with more useless posts...
You literally added 2 pages of fluff by yourself while 'catching up'

I'm voting for this guy just because of this....

VOTE: emps

In post 567, emps wrote:
In post 277, Wimpy wrote:
In post 274, Wickedestjr wrote:Yes, it does matter. I would appreciate if you could answer this question. At the very least, it would be nice to know the nature of the 200+ games that you’ve played. For instance, there’s a major difference between playing 200+ games on a real-time site like epicmafia vs playing forum games like here.
I disagree
just... tell us where you played?

pedit : oh uh... check the activity overview and that should give u ur answer lmao
how to check activity overview?

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:31 pm
by alimdia
Nvm I figured out where activity overview is.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:35 pm
by emps
ooooh out of game influences and threats and reports to the mod ooooh what drama

fuck me can you guys just let this bs go and not have it be like repeating the same shit over and over again for a good 20 pages?

pedit : oh no im so sorry for having playstyle differences

i dont wanna sit down and skim, spam click the multiquote button, have a 20 light year long catchup contained in a spoiler that no one will read.

i dont want to sit down and think "wait why the fuck did i quote this post in the first place?"

you seem to be super concerned about fluff posts. we got out of rvs relatively quickly and before most people even checked in. why are you complaining?

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:36 pm
by emps
just checked, this isnt ur first game.

ima go check if you complained so much about some joking around and basic rvs which happens in

i dunno

every fucking game

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:37 pm
by alimdia
Fluff posts in the first few pages are fine. We're up to page 24 now and you haven't even caught up, meanwhile you have 93 posts

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:40 pm
by emps
oh wow you didnt complain a single time about fluff or joking around

that or the gane was really bland and no one joked around and people started seriously voting each other on pg 1.

pedit : its my playstyle and it makes it easier for me to read others, and it actually makes people read my catchups. multiple posts are a lot easier to read than a 10 paragraph long essay detailing every single thing i felt necessary to point out.

also, you complained about fluff on pg 1 lmao

if ur really fine w fluff on the first few pages, why did u complain abt datisi and mena on pg 1/2

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:41 pm
by emps
most games arent 27 or so pages long like ur first one was. most reach at least 60 pages and there are plenty that have reached far higher

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:42 pm
by emps
also this game is probably going to be miserable with 4 ppl who post a shit ton if you cant handle people posting multiple times in a row lol

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:44 pm
by emps
oh wow you guys really didnt fuck around at all at like post 14 rvs ended ok then

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:46 pm
by emps
oh wow page 17 is a shitshow im going to pretend like i didnt see that

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:47 pm
by emps
In post 437, Datisi wrote:
Please spell my name right or I will consider that a personal insult.
lul

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:47 pm
by emps
In post 595, emps wrote:oh wow page 17 is a shitshow im going to pretend like i didnt see that
oh wow page 18 is a shitshow im going to pretend like i didnt see that

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:49 pm
by Plum
Votecount 1.3
Image


Wimpy
- 2 (Datisi, Menalque)
emps
- 3 (Wickedestjr, Luca Blight, alimdia)

Menalque
- 1 (Wimpy)
Datisi
- 1 (emps)

Not Voting
- 2 (Alduskkel, Iconeum)

With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch.
Deadline:
(expired on 2019-11-18 23:00:00)

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:54 pm
by emps
yay im finally done catching up

i honestly have no fucking clue what my reads are tbh

i TR datisi and SL wimpy but everyone else is ??? like i keep going back and forth on mena and no one else has really posted enough for me to actually read them except for like maybe alimidia who wants to policy lynch me for spamposting despite having far less posts than datisi wimpy and mena?