In post 525, Comical wrote:Yes, but Clidd, assuming you’re correct based on a page 6 read is insanely ignorant, and post game, if you are town, you should really take consideration in seeing the weaknesses in your play, in addition to learning how even if you think someone is scum, you still need to be able to work with said player in the case you are wrong, which you are here.
i'm looking to improve, but my difficulty in this game was the fact that i am being actively ignored by most players
i would understand better if someone talked to me and explained why my logical sequence about you being scum is incorrect, so that we can arrive at a better conclusion
but what i saw was "you're wrong and you're scummy" without an argumentative context for me to try to understand
i am not ignorant to the point of considering myself the owner of reason, but i believe that my opinions should be discussed with more seriousness and not with ignorance. part of the reason why I was forcibly replaced from my past game (which I was also town), was precisely because of the same process of neglect with my opinions. ok, i was toxic there, I was wrong, but basically nobody proposed to talk to me about it in that match, and i would behave better if i were at least considered to be a player of significant importance in the game.
