Page 24 of 99

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 11:34 am
by votato
eh, why are we so sure it was a lie? Its too obvious a lie and wouldnt be convincing. Seems more like a mistake. The wagon on vp appeared suddenly because the argument was compelling. Npom you are confbiased. Take a step back and re- evaluate. Every piece of evidence you see points you to him being scum

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 11:35 am
by votato
In post 574, VP Baltar wrote:He sure is active now.

More votes please.
he was lurking, so i scum read him. Now he's active, and that's a scum tell too. What? Lol. He became active prior to the wagon. I'm not gonna sit here and defend him, cuz i have a null read so far. But this case is awful

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 11:37 am
by Quick
In post 574, VP Baltar wrote:He sure is active now.

More votes please.
I will be sure to hammer :)

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 11:38 am
by Quick
And now I am reading VP as Town.

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 11:40 am
by Blair
Image

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 11:46 am
by VP Baltar
In post 575, votato wrote:eh, why are we so sure it was a lie? Its too obvious a lie and wouldnt be convincing. Seems more like a mistake. The wagon on vp appeared suddenly because the argument was compelling. Npom you are confbiased. Take a step back and re- evaluate. Every piece of evidence you see points you to him being scum
It was not the truth, which was very clear and he seemed to know literally minutes earlier. I don't know about you, but I don't have dementia enough to forget the difference between two and one moments later.
In post 576, votato wrote:
In post 574, VP Baltar wrote:He sure is active now.

More votes please.
he was lurking, so i scum read him. Now he's active, and that's a scum tell too. What? Lol. He became active prior to the wagon. I'm not gonna sit here and defend him, cuz i have a null read so far. But this case is awful
Yeah. He has lurked most of this game and then starts rapid posting when I put some pressure on him. Which alignment do you think that is more likely from.

As far as "awful", how would you rank the quality of the case against me? In fact, what in your mind is the case against me?

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 11:48 am
by Blair
In post 519, Blair wrote:
@EVERYONE


Flash-reads on Quick, please! For verily and forsooth doth I have need of them!
In post 546, Blair wrote:Your evasion is noted.

Let's put your claim to the test:

Is it true? Quick claims everyone but Blair is townreading him.
Wasting away over here...

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 11:59 am
by Quick
I kinda low key just want to ditch the thread and just magically show up to hammer. Hmm.

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 12:45 pm
by mavsfan41
Speaking of extreme lurkers, has Peter Pan been prodded yet/replaced?

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 12:55 pm
by mavsfan41
@ready2rock: in 403 you mention votato and imply he’s scummy more than he’s town, but then do backtrack that a little. Any thoughts on him now? Also, why place the vote on VP Baltar vs votato when voting in 409 after previously believing votato scum and not even expressing an opinion on VP Baltar previously or even when you placed your vote?

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 1:24 pm
by Nauci
In post 508, mavsfan41 wrote:@Nauci: I gotta ask now, why did you include the mod set up post in 221? It was unrelated to the content of your post and wasn’t prompted by one of the previous posts and didn’t appear to be a response to a question. Furthermore, um, the top of that post you quote does in fact say private threads have day talk. It’s right at the top and not buried later down in that post.
Didn't I say right after that post that it was an accident while mobile posting and I don't know why it happened

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 1:43 pm
by Nauci
In post 525, Quick wrote:
In post 517, VP Baltar wrote:Major town points on Nauci here for me. I had been eyeing her carefully, but only town would defuse this pointless fight that well. Not looking great for you iDany.
Naw, Nauci is a self admitted meta diver so they have poured over my posts trying to understand me.
Yeah you're right, going way out of my way to elucidate the playstyle of probably the biggest mislynch bait player in the game and defuse town tunneling is tooooootally NAI

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 1:45 pm
by Nauci
In post 528, Blair wrote:

These were my examples of Quick being intentionally cryptic, for reference.



This was Quick's denial of being intentionally cryptic, for reference.

Quick says one of those three was a joke, and continues to pretend that one is the only one I listed.
Those 4 posts have been brought up and addressed multiple times and as a good player we really need your input, analysis, and pressure on the several other avenues of scum hunting that have been flying past your blinders kthxbai <3

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 1:46 pm
by Nauci
In post 534, Blair wrote:
In post 530, Quick wrote:How about the way I play generates discussion. How does that sit with you?
All events generate discussion.

Pointless events (lying as town, which seems to be your defense) generate pointless discussion.
ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ the irony here is too rich for my blood ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 1:49 pm
by Blair
You understand it's only ironic in the alternate universe where I believe he is lying as town, right?

Why is it so hard for everyone but VP to answer a simple question? Why does no one want to share their reads on Quick?

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 1:50 pm
by Nauci
In post 547, ready2rock wrote:So your case on me revolves around me misreading the vote count?
Lmao I'm one sentence into this response and it's already screaming lvl 99 scummy misrepresentation

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 1:52 pm
by Blair
General resistance to the Quick case is coming from the same body of players who are reluctant to share the current reads on him.

If this is supposed to make me feel less paranoid, it isn't working.

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 1:56 pm
by Umlaut
Peter Pan was prodded. He has (expired on 2020-05-18 00:56:00) to pick up the prod.

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 1:59 pm
by VP Baltar
I support people answering Blair directly. Put your cards on the table people so we can keep this game progressing

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 2:00 pm
by Blair
In post 587, Nauci wrote:as a good player we really need your input, analysis, and pressure on the several other avenues of scum hunting that have been flying past your blinders kthxbai <3
I believe I have weighed in on all of the current avenues.

If I missed one, direct me to it and ask me about it.

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 2:02 pm
by Nauci
In post 560, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Pretty confident. They are playing just like they did in the newbie game when they were scum. So unless you just want to discard meta for no reason...
So you read a single past game, and, without having seen their town game, are this confident that they are scum, and the tell that you're building this confidence on is "posts about not being able to post"? Just checking that I'm not misreading/misinterpreting here.

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 2:02 pm
by NoPowerOverMe
Quick is wishy washy town.

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 2:08 pm
by Nauci
In post 589, Blair wrote:You understand it's only ironic in the alternate universe where I believe he is lying as town, right?

Why is it so hard for everyone but VP to answer a simple question? Why does no one want to share their reads on Quick?
I think you've been using all of your efforts on this pointless line of pursuit and I've repeatedly stated that A: I can't read Quick's alignment, B: this surface level contradiction is not worth pursuing because it will never be elucidating

So I found it wildly ironic that you are saying he will generate useless posts while repeatedly making posts which aren't helpful to figuring out anybody's alignment

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 2:12 pm
by Blair
So far: two reads and one "I can't read his alignment."

Thank you for your cooperation. :D

Are you confident that you will be able to read his alignment by LyLo?

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 2:14 pm
by Quick
In post 596, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Quick is wishy washy town.
Yeah, until endgame.