In post 524, popopopopopopo wrote:i reread the thread and this interaction stuck out to me. reads like 2 scum players lightly prodding it each othe
wdym by prodding? I know NDMath from a different site, so maybe that can explain it?
What is ndmath playstyle like?
I have a scum read nahdia as well. I didn't like her list and when i pushed her on it, her response is very wishy washy. It doesn't realyy explain well why a few players are higher on her list. Didn't like the buddying.
I understand hotac issue with Abr. I give him a day before i completely decide how i feel about him.
I will say it bothers me that abr avoids certain wagons and id think he'd learned not to avoid wagons if he's going to vote along the wagons. But im being bias about right now.
Posted: Wed May 20, 2020 10:27 am
by ManateeDude
what on earth is happening someone engage me
Posted: Wed May 20, 2020 10:28 am
by Albert B. Rampage
Leave Nahdia alone, she's town.
Posted: Wed May 20, 2020 10:31 am
by votato
the fact that farside hasnt started pushing me yet tells me that farside is scum. farside always scumreads me.
In post 62, midwaybear wrote:trying to decipher what you're trying to say is harder than the reading comprehension section on certain standardized tests
My best guess is that you're asking how good our scum games are.
My answer: I like to think that it's good, but it's probably not
In post 91, midwaybear wrote:I will do my best to decipher whatever language Hoctac is speaking
In post 100, midwaybear wrote:It is a gimmick
we would appreciate it if you speak like you normally do
pedit: yeah
this stuff reads like busywork, overemphasis on the typos and meme posting common at the start of day 1, especially in a large. great way to be active in thread and look busy/helpful without contributing to town wincon.
In post 130, popopopopopopo wrote:in a large game like this, picking some VI to quicklynch isn't a bad idea day 1.
I disagree? I mean we probably will end up lynching a VI, but I don't think we should quicklynch.
ok, if we probably end up lynching a VI as u say, whats the problem with a quicklynch. also, midwaybear would go on to contradict himself later on
In post 162, midwaybear wrote:yeah sure
however, I am a bit cautious. I don't really see anything too out of the blue with word's current posts compared to his standard town meta
this was a lie, he didnt check word's meta. he had one game played with him, so referencing "standard town meta" is disingenuous at best.
In post 203, midwaybear wrote:Ok, so Hoctac was basically trolling us
Dunno what to think about that :/
hoctac was trolling us good town players frowny face :/
please
In post 208, midwaybear wrote:Hmm that actually is an interesting contradiction you pointed out. VOTE: Manatee
In post 259, midwaybear wrote:I feel like manatee's explanation doesn't make sense which is why my vote is still o him
i cant talk since i also voted manatee, but that shit was wack we can all look back and agree
OK NOW THIS PART I FIND ESPECIALLY SKETCHY, I DIDNT QUOTE EVERY POST IN ORDER BUT HERE IS THE IMPORTANT PART
In post 323, Albert B. Rampage wrote:We had a solid bandwagon on word, and a competing miniwagon with manatee. I think that's sufficient information for day 2, all considered.
I'm just tired of 80 page day 1s where every town role is outted and scum can pick the PRs apart...….every damn time.
HOW IS THIS NOT A DIRECT CONTRADICTION TO MIDBEAR SAYING TO ME HE DOESN'T WANT A QUICKLYNCH IN POST #132?? HE HAS COMPLETELY SHIFTED HIS OPINION AND NOW HE IS ALL LIKE "LOL IM DOWN" WHEN IT COMES TO SPEEDWAGON ON MADONNA, AFTER PREVIOUSLY SAYING HE DOESNT THINK WE SHOULD MISLYNCH. VERY SUS
this shit i dont like either. admonishing someone for joking around, then 6 posts later he posts a smiley.
In post 458, midwaybear wrote:I think manatee shouldn't be pushed from his explanations. I still do not see his logic, but I am going to give him the benefit of the doubt. I don't really have much on the others, but I like stan1ey too because he is pushing people and trying to find contradictions.
here is another post when he harps on about this stanley townread again for some unknown reason.
LOOK THROUGH HIS ISO AND FIND ME A SCUMREAD, FIND ME JUST ONE. midwaybear voted manatee for a shit reason, and then hopped on the madonna wagon, which i and abr joked about being a speed wagon, right after stating he doesn't want a speedlynch.
so
vote: midwaybear
i feel good about this
Spoiler: my response to each of his points
the busywork thing: You can basically say that for everyone during RVS, so I don't know why this is even a point. It could be seen as scum fake contributing, but look at it like an introduction.
VI comment: I thought VI meant village innocent, but I realize now that you meant it as village idiot.
word meta: I mean town metas do not really change too much
hoctac: idk what u are trying to say here srry
manatee: I backed off of manatee
madonna: lol Idk what I was thinking there. TBH, madonna was never in danger of getting lynched.
hypocrisy: sorry
stan1ey: someone asked me for my reads, so I that's why I mentioned stan1ey
scumread: they will come do not worry
Posted: Wed May 20, 2020 10:51 am
by midwaybear
In post 586, NDMath wrote: is a site culture thing and I was expecting him to mention something to the degree of 585 but he hadn't.
oops that too
Posted: Wed May 20, 2020 10:52 am
by popopopopopopo
YEA ID SAY IM COMFORTABLE WITH MY VOTE
Posted: Wed May 20, 2020 10:53 am
by NorwegianboyEE
I was still doubtful until i read: "oops that too"
Posted: Wed May 20, 2020 10:53 am
by Albert B. Rampage
In post 587, midwaybear wrote:VI comment: I thought VI meant village innocent, but I realize now that you meant it as village idiot.
You wanted to quicklynch a...village innocent?
Posted: Wed May 20, 2020 10:53 am
by NorwegianboyEE
VOTE: Midwaybear
Posted: Wed May 20, 2020 10:53 am
by midwaybear
no I didn't want to quicklynch a innocent
i thought you guys meant innocent when you meant idiot
I like 461 from nahdia a lot.
Using the readlist they posted to refer to their earlier posts, I'm able to see the possible town mindset behind them a lot clearer then first read of them.
I'm getting torn on midway I'm seeing it both ways right now.
I'll look at his iso again.
Posted: Wed May 20, 2020 10:56 am
by midwaybear
In post 595, NDMath wrote:I like 461 from nahdia a lot.
Using the readlist they posted to refer to their earlier posts, I'm able to see the possible town mindset behind them a lot clearer then first read of them.
I'm getting torn on midway I'm seeing it both ways right now.
I'll look at his iso again.
bruh I thought I was ez to read
Posted: Wed May 20, 2020 10:56 am
by popopopopopopo
In post 587, midwaybear wrote:the busywork thing: You can basically say that for everyone during RVS, so I don't know why this is even a point. It could be seen as scum fake contributing, but look at it like an introduction.
no, u made 4-5 posts about the typos, it was forced.
VI comment: I thought VI meant village innocent, but I realize now that you meant it as village idiot.
word meta: I mean town metas do not really change too much
hoctac: idk what u are trying to say here srry
manatee: I backed off of manatee
madonna: lol Idk what I was thinking there. TBH, madonna was never in danger of getting lynched.
so you have no explanation for why you changed your position on quicklynching? madonna was at 5 votes at one point IIRC
hypocrisy: sorry
stan1ey: someone asked me for my reads, so I that's why I mentioned stan1ey
scumread: they will come do not worry
ok give us just 1 scumread then lmfao
Posted: Wed May 20, 2020 10:56 am
by NorwegianboyEE
Oh wait, i think i misunderstood that.
Posted: Wed May 20, 2020 10:56 am
by Albert B. Rampage
In post 593, midwaybear wrote:no I didn't want to quicklynch a innocent
i thought you guys meant innocent when you meant idiot
You said town was probably going to lynch a village innocent today and then you said you were down to quicklynch...
I feel bad catching scum this easily, there's no contest