Mafiascum.net

In post 577, Mikul wrote:If I lose us this game I apologize in advance. Without results and outing prs so early and the early innactivity and replacements has made this very hard to deal with and read properly. That being said I don't think tl is scum. The way that he reacted to what he thought was a scum slip seemed town and if he is scum then good game

I rbed quick and votato once.

In post 501, votato wrote:

In post 428, LicketyQuickety wrote:I think it's pretty clear at least one of TL/votato is Scum. I think TL has made some posts that are hard(er) to fake as Scum, so that leaves me thinking votato is Scum. So Scum are in those three between TL/votato/nash. I really think the way votato dropped off means he's Scum since he doesn't actually have legit reasons for why I am Scum and can't defend that position.

here is a three-person PoE that does not include anthony.

In post 502, votato wrote:and you think im more aggressive in this game than youve seen before or less?

In post 507, votato wrote:ok. VOTE: ydrasse

In post 522, votato wrote:ydrasse, it sucks for you, but you repped into a scummy slot and PoE was going this direction no matter what.

In post 529, votato wrote:i think i was the main person deflecting from looter, so saying that it was scum resisting that wagon isnt gonna get you very far, at least with me.

In post 580, LicketyQuickety wrote:Nash hasn't really been on my radar and IDRK why. I think that slot has pretty much just lurked all game and just done nothing else. Mikul has an okay point on Tl, but I still think that just makes votato slot Scum. I haven't checked super closely, but given Nash has lurked so much, I can totally see Nash/votato as Scum team.

In post 585, LicketyQuickety wrote:I found like one thing that is even remotely close to being a Non-Associative between votato/Nash. I will not actually link the post because I don't want to give this metric away yet, but it doesn't completely fulfil my criteria for a Non-Associative so whatever. Still, I would say it's maybe better than nothing, but Nash has something really similar with my slot as well, so IDK.

I guess I will just trust you on Tl at this point since you aren't budging there anyways.

In post 586, Mikul wrote:

In post 585, LicketyQuickety wrote:I found like one thing that is even remotely close to being a Non-Associative between votato/Nash. I will not actually link the post because I don't want to give this metric away yet, but it doesn't completely fulfil my criteria for a Non-Associative so whatever. Still, I would say it's maybe better than nothing, but Nash has something really similar with my slot as well, so IDK.

I guess I will just trust you on Tl at this point since you aren't budging there anyways.

You don't have to trust me. I could be entirely wrong. I've often been wrong. I just picked his post as geninue excitement about what he thought was a scum slip and if I'm wrong then we've already lost. I won't be able to break away from that

So the second I townread him (in my mind )

Nash has to be scum

In post 588, Nash wrote:judging by their interactions and unnatural scum theatre.

In post 590, Nash wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 6, brassherald wrote:Guess mafsepia is out.

VOTE: votato

In post 8, votato wrote:to the newbies: welcome! I don't recognize any of you, so I'm assuming we have some first timers. A few tips: this is mafia, people are going to accuse you of being a liar and a cheat. It's gonna feel bad. The sooner you can get used to it the better for you. People are also going to attack you for what you say. As a member of the town, you should be sharing your thoughts anyway, and with time you will learn how to share your thoughts without getting attacked.
You should take some time to carefully read the above posts and familiarize yourself with some of the jargon and guides, especially if you have no mafia experience or no experience with forum mafia. The SEs are here to offer help, but do not take our word as law. I think even if we are scum none of us would tell lies that would confuse you or make you bad players, but there is a decent chance that at least one of us is scum and will lie to you about some things. That said, you shouldn't hesitate to ask questions of each other and if the SEs. The two other SEs are a lot more experienced than i.

To everyone, but especially the SEs: please view this post as nai. Again to the newbies: don't assume that just because I'm trying to be helpful that im a townie. Is make this post a scum too.


VOTE: brass omgus

In post 64, votato wrote:

In post 58, Town looter wrote:

In post 49, ArthurConyl wrote:@Mikul Alright, I do agree this game is a little too quiet. Spam away I guess.
@looter Same question as votato, why would you lynch me?

Partly a reaction test, partly because your posts could be newbie-cum-scum - your posts have a feeling of anxiety in them, you seem to want to make sure you fit in and say the right thing. My question of Brassherald was semi-serious as I am still fairly inexperienced and wanted to see if your two posts were worth caring about.

Underlined the bits I think come across as anxious:

In post 31, ArthurConyl wrote:Tbh Mikul has about 60% of the posts so far, slow it down please. Can't keep up!
VOTE: Mikul

I know this is a dodgy tactic but I promise to unvote

if you slow down...

In post 32, ArthurConyl wrote:Wait, I can't do that, we're still in the RVS.

Literally just realised that's the third vote on Mikul. Better UNVOTE: Mikul

VOTE: Anthony, because there can only be one A-man...

In post 61, Town looter wrote:

In post 53, ArthurConyl wrote:VOTE: Town looter You've stated you want to lynch me without reason, and also voted Mikul pretty early in the game over metareading.

Also you've stated you'll be lurking the whole game.

Loads of anti-town plays that scum would do.

FoS: Town looter

Waaaaiiiit. Missed underlined in first skim.

Any reason you are paraphrasing what is fairly obviously a joke so critically?

Did you learn anything from the reaction test? This is good reasoning otherwise. In particular the nervous unvote usually comes from scum and scum have a hard time picking up on jokes. VOTE: arthur

Fos brass for that defense

In post 135, votato wrote:

In post 131, Anthony87 wrote:Sorry I didn't vote when I posted my last message, this is my first forum game and I honestly wasn't sure if voting before discussion about our thoughts was normal (I saw someone else use FoS without voting before so I wasn't sure). I was ready then and I'm ready now to L-1 Arthur for the reasons I posted before. Isn't it normal for people to claim when they get down to L-2/L-1? He just threw a tantrum.

VOTE: ArthurConyl L-1

don't care for this all that much. Still better than brass' vote

In post 173, votato wrote:yeah both anthony and brass really didnt do any scumhunting yesterday. brass was active lurking and LAMISTing pretty hard.

VOTE: anthony

In post 190, votato wrote:

In post 185, Lunatic wrote:2 scum are within Anthony, vex, townlooter and brassherald.

and id remove townlooter from that PoE i think. i think.

In post 268, votato wrote:i still think looter is likely town. Im fine voting either brass or Anthony. I feel that claiming was a bit silly, you were both already town. Oh well. Dunno why everyone is ignoring vexossa. Definite room for a lurky scum there

In post 272, votato wrote:I think brass is a good option here

In post 293, votato wrote:ok i gues ill defer to mikul and lunatic since they were both in that game with you and know you better. but i still think brass is the best lynch today.

In post 329, votato wrote:Im ready to lynch brass

Outside of RVS, votato never placed his vote on brass, inspite of having him under his radar for almost the entire Day. I can see a lot of subtle shading, but none actually look genuine.

You vote votato for his unvote and then throw more shade at him for pushing Anthony, which you say could have come from town!votato. The read based off of one unvote does not feel sincere at that stage, after which you proceed to fencesit. Votato's 380 was not good, because the continued refusal was what made brass look town to me. Neither of your meta reads are good. 461 and 462 just don't make sense.

It makes perfect sense to have some scum theatrics there since neither of you really had any traction to be eliminated.

In post 592, keyenpeydee wrote:

Oh omg, I didn't know votato was banned. Replacing him now!

In post 308, Nash wrote:I skimmed through the pages and realised that post 27 wasn't perceived well.

In post 27, VexoOssa wrote:Nice to meet yall!! I know we can't stay friendly forever,

but not having to choose a solid vote is pretty calming.

The dice say Vote: mutesa1

nothing against you m8 just had to do something..

It's pretty obvious that the alignment known to have a problem with choosing a solid vote and urge to

do something

is the mafia, and any sane player would know this. To think that scum!Vexo typed that down and didn't feel even a tiny urge to scrutinise is a stretch, don't you think? I know for a fact that this slot is town and I can assure you that this is an authentic

case of TStBS

. Normally I wouldn't adopt a defensive tone like this, but we will lose both of our PRs with no extra information if we carry out a mislynch (assuming no CCs - A1).

Obviously the best move for scum at the moment would be to join the Nash wagon, and I'm confident that there's scum in {Town Looter, brassherald, ArthurConyl}.
Based on vote progression alone, I'll go for Town Looter for now. I can spot a scum agenda there.

I'm fairly convinced that votato is town.

If any of you have cases on one of the three, I'm all ears.

In post 347, Mikul wrote:I kind of want to Gambit this game

I want to Lynch Anthony and if he flips scum it basically confirms herald. I don't think he would bus him what that read scum

If Anthony flips town we lynch herald no matter what.

And hope that Poe works