Mafiascum.net

In post 574, Not_Mafia wrote:I'm a Day PT Cop, BananaCucho has a PT

VOTE: BananaCucho

In post 574, Not_Mafia wrote:I'm a Day PT Cop, BananaCucho has a PT

VOTE: BananaCucho

In post 497, geraintm wrote:

In post 477, callforjudgement wrote:

In post 467, geraintm wrote:I assumed it was real because I checked the wiki

Normal Guidelines

Vigilantes are considered Normal on mafiascum.net if their kill flavour is indistinguishable from other factions'. As of 9 November 2015, they must also be town aligned.

And i read that and went "oh..." but every game I play there seems to be a new role I've never played with before.
I wish people wouldn't lie fake claims just confuwe me. I'm a simple man and just want things kept all easy

Vigilante and Day Vigilante are normally considered different roles (you can also see a dayvig as Vigilante plus the Day modifier, but Day is abNormal).

Anyway, what's bothering me about this is: if you assumed that a dayvig is legal in Normals on the basis that it's a type of Vigilante, and that the dayvig shot were real, but were aware that Vigilantes were always town, surely you should have assumed that RCEnigma was confirmed town as a result?

In post 398, geraintm wrote:@RCenigma - you have call for judgement as scum, but you have just killed Gamma??

There doesn't seem to be much reason to ask about the motivation of a "confirmed townie", unless you want their help sorting a slot (and in the hypothetical world where Gamma is "about to flip", there is absolutely no reason to try to scumhunt the slot, you just wait for the mod to get online). So in retrospect, this post looks more like you were trying to figure out how a townie would react to the dayvig, than actually reacting to the dayvig.

I think you underestimate how puzzled I can be by other players. I had had a conversation with them about how they knew someone had voted for scum, worked out they meant one exact vote on one exact player, and then they just went and vigged someone else. I wanted to know why. They explained and from then I was waiting for the mod to come along and flip the kill and then I would either shout at them for a terrible shot or congratulate them on their amazing aim (as I firmly believe if they had shot scum it was blind luck).
That is my honest explanation of what was going through my head at the time _ someone in very QuickTime trying to work out what exactly what going on, checking the wiki and all. I am not sure what you mean by scumhunting the slot (the person shot?) or trying to concoct a reaction to a day vig.

Have I explained myself well enough.

Your next post though confuses me, where you attack Walter for only interacting with me. You think you have found two scum in me and Walter?

In post 501, Tayl0r Swift wrote:27 (reaver) pings me. let me give an excuse for not having any good reads before starting. also isnt pocketing something that only scum would have to do?
50 (judgement) strikes me as wayyy too tryhard for that stage in the game. overanalyzing that much doesnt feel natural. judgements later posts on that page also reek of teaching and trying to score easy townpoints.
74 raya is probably town
104 (italiano) is odd. pretty defensive and finger-pointy and generally sounds like scum trying to sound like theyre posting from a town mindset.
113 (reaver) uh excuse me? where is any of this coming from? booo. this long wall of posts has some good stuff but its too long and its making me suspicious.
150 (frogster) is a good one
152 (judgement) is a good response but NAI and proves that judgement is pretty self-aware in wording, so guess we will have to evaluate content rather than phrasing.
165 (raya) is interesting. raya said she townhunts, but is here pretty aggressive in scumhunting. hmm
180 (frog) is bad. frog seems to really be digging here.

i caught up to the top of page 9. more to come later.

In post 507, callforjudgement wrote:

In post 297, Raya36 wrote:I think Frog is probably town

also moving my vote somewhere more useful
VOTE: Walter

In post 299, Raya36 wrote:There's no wagon on callforjudgement anymore while there is on Walter. Plus I can barely read judgements posts so I need to go back through later

Based on this reasoning, why didn't you move your vote back onto me?

In post 525, RCEnigma wrote:Damn. I really wanted my cfj read to be right, but Taylor is playing pretty on par with how i thought scum would rep in.

In post 579, Tayl0r Swift wrote:im a day daycop cop. N_M isnt a daycop of any kind.

In post 576, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 574, Not_Mafia wrote:I'm a Day PT Cop, BananaCucho has a PT

VOTE: BananaCucho

What??

In post 589, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I feel a slight tr about the gerain slot after cfj's post and explanation. although such a defense of Gerain seemed very out of the blue.
I find this whole fake guilty thing to be highly suspicious and pr fishing.

I am really tired rn going to sleep.

In post 590, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 576, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 574, Not_Mafia wrote:I'm a Day PT Cop, BananaCucho has a PT

VOTE: BananaCucho

What??

Do you not have the ability to read one post up?

In post 592, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 590, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 576, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 574, Not_Mafia wrote:I'm a Day PT Cop, BananaCucho has a PT

VOTE: BananaCucho

What??

Do you not have the ability to read one post up?

What does it mean?

In post 592, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 590, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 576, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 574, Not_Mafia wrote:I'm a Day PT Cop, BananaCucho has a PT

VOTE: BananaCucho

What??

Do you not have the ability to read one post up?

What does it mean?

In post 573, Nosferatu wrote:this games getting kinda boring can someone fake a guilty?

In post 591, Raya36 wrote:

In post 589, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I feel a slight tr about the gerain slot after cfj's post and explanation. although such a defense of Gerain seemed very out of the blue.
I find this whole fake guilty thing to be highly suspicious and pr fishing.

I am really tired rn going to sleep.

How was it pr fishing

In post 592, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 590, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 576, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 574, Not_Mafia wrote:I'm a Day PT Cop, BananaCucho has a PT

VOTE: BananaCucho

What??

Do you not have the ability to read one post up?

What does it mean?