Mafiascum.net

In post 572, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 567, Menalque wrote:Wait why can’t vanders be scum with bingle?

bingle knows the mech and wouldnt throw vander into the more important scum slot

In post 569, Menalque wrote:The fundamental question is “does infinity!scum take the risk of trying to paranoia/WIFOM everyone on skitter/bingle being in together, or not?”

In post 541, NorwegianboyEE wrote:My theory is that the hood distribution proves we have a ballsy player that wants to take on the big league and prove themselves in the small hood, and a more clever deepwolf that will be trying to sound town, harmless, and pocket town in the bigger hood.
Small hood is for the powerful bruiser, big hood for the long-living wolf.

In post 544, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Long story short is that i more or less townread other slots in the 6p group and i think Vanderscamp's not really towntold yet and could therefore be scum just faking mediocre content.

In post 550, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:No Face trying to make Pooky/Bingle scumteam a thing when Bingle!Scum autoloses if Pooky!scum flips is kind of cute ngl :3

In post 578, Bingle wrote:Norwee, can you tell me about how these two positions mesh?

Cause I firmly agree with the gamestate read and think it heavily implies the read on Vander is wrong.

In post 458, No Face wrote:The main face for Infinity being mafia is because it's weird for mafia skitter or Bingle to put her in the group of 3 when she feels more like a group of 6 player, since she is more likely to be wrongfully eliminated by the other players when she is town, more often that players like Menalque or Pooky. Mafia needs to put all the players that can sometimes look like mafia as town in the group of 6 because that is the one that matters. This is why I think skitter is more likely to be town, because she could blend in well in the group of 6 so she only puts herself in group of 3 if she doesn't really want to play as mafia for too long.

I can see mafia Infinity putting herself with 2 strong players and coming out swinging. The words are possibly written.

Bingle seems to be playing quite safely, like he's in a safe :O

In post 464, Infinity 324 wrote:This feels like one night stand, I'm very far out of my scumrange but people feel like SRing me anyway

In post 464, Infinity 324 wrote:This feels like one night stand, I'm very far out of my scumrange but people feel like SRing me anyway

In post 581, Vanderscamp wrote:Also, was it public knowledge that bingle was a strong player at the start of the game?
They're jingle's alt apparently, but was that already known?

In post 579, No Face wrote:

In post 550, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:No Face trying to make Pooky/Bingle scumteam a thing when Bingle!Scum autoloses if Pooky!scum flips is kind of cute ngl :3

No Face said that before Bingle was suspicious of Pooky's words or voted for him, No Face isn't a time traveler...

This is very strange Pooky

In post 540, Infinity 324 wrote:I'm wondering why scum!jingle put skitter in the 3p hood and then argued for a plan specifically involving wanting to keep skitt alive? He obviously was aware that skitt can be a threat, so it seems odd

In the future if someone doesn't like a PoE vote that I make, questioning my TRs is much more useful than questioning the vote itself

PEdit: ok but you're hectic

In post 343, Bingle wrote:

In post 341, skitter30 wrote:

In post 328, Infinity 324 wrote:I'm going to sleep

night infinity! we shall continue our bickering on the morrow

In post 335, Bingle wrote:Pooky.

ok interesting take, why?

FMPOV: 50% of the time you are scum. You know that scum in the small pool cannot be the endgame scum, therefore your partner is likely high tier. I would wager a very significant portion of the time, Infinity's team would also be aware of this restriction. That implies that the scum in the other pool is someone who can be trusted to pull a game by themselves. Of the names I recognize, Pooky and Mena best fit that bill with an outside chance of HecticAlt. Mena/You doesn't look S/S. Pooky and you have a disproportionate likelihood of being grouped if unaligned.

All of that is circumstantial evidence that points to Pooky having a higher likelihood of being scum than anyone else. Also, if I flip PookyTown, you become significantly more likely to be town imo, which is helpful for solving the you/infinity 1v1 later.

In post 553, Bingle wrote:

In post 551, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’m not meta diving, i just remember.

Hm. What do you think about the fact that your characterization is not only 100% accurate, but actually the reason I lost in a game that I linked in the neighborhood that just so happens to have scum in it 100% of the time?

In post 108, No Face wrote:Bingle and Pooky or Vanders :)

In post 596, Bingle wrote:No, Pooky was though. The tinfoil was that Nor's scumpartner could have shared the links with him. It's a pretty out there theory, and I liked Nor's casual dismissal of it though.

viewtopic.php?f=84&t=85019
viewtopic.php?f=84&t=84842

for reference.