Posted: Mon May 03, 2021 4:17 am
THAT part is actually pretty typical.In post 574, samantha97 wrote:creating multiple giant read lists based on nothing for some people
THAT part is actually pretty typical.In post 574, samantha97 wrote:creating multiple giant read lists based on nothing for some people
I'll defend the FUCK out of America.In post 550, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:MY PRESIDENTIAL CABINET SO FAR:
PRESIDENT: POOKY
VICE PRESIDENT: LLD
DESIGNATED SURVIVOR: BELL
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE: DEATHNOTE
ATTORNEY GENERAL: JOQIZA
I mean, yes. It's kind of worrying to have someone scumreading me for what seems to me to be a terrible reason and who won't engage with me at all, in a game where it only requires a single person scumreading you to kill you.In post 553, Nexus wrote:Obsessed with me.
Sure, but why on earth does this apply to these two? They each have only a few posts toward each other, and they seem to mostly reflect a non-alignment-related friendship, which wouldn't be fake even if one or both of them were scum.In post 551, mastina wrote:Exactly what it sounds like: a dynamic where the users cannot be scum-scum and cannot be scum-town because if it were scum-scum they wouldn't be able to keep it up and if it were scum-town the scum would struggle to realistically keep it up in a way fooling the town.
There's not really much to discuss, is there? I think you're scum, your actions are doing nothing to convince me you're not scum, and your obsession with me is probably just going to mean you get scumread elsewhere.In post 577, Et Al wrote:I mean, yes. It's kind of worrying to have someone scumreading me for what seems to me to be a terrible reason and who won't engage with me at all, in a game where it only requires a single person scumreading you to kill you.In post 553, Nexus wrote:Obsessed with me.
I'm trying to have an actual conversation with you. Is there some reason you don't want to do that?
-S
I don't understand why I "needed something to do". Couldn't I have just not posted anything?In post 373, Nexus wrote:as your PM was a scum PM, you found it stressful and needed something to do.
Protective roles take note. TIAIn post 562, Vaxkiller wrote:Yea, this. Scum are going to be looking to PR hunt from time stamps.In post 500, Cephrir wrote:The optimal choice was actually for no one to post for a day but I didnt think of that until a few hours ago
Also, Sunday morning? Cmon!
I guess I wanted a silo anyway, but only sorta.
You could've, but I also think that a hydra with 2+ heads probably feels like they should be active, and a LAMIST post is perfect for that.In post 582, Et Al wrote:I mean I'm trying to get you to explain this bit:I don't understand why I "needed something to do". Couldn't I have just not posted anything?In post 373, Nexus wrote:as your PM was a scum PM, you found it stressful and needed something to do.
-S
I NEED TO SEE AT LEAST ONE RUSSKIE SCALP TO GIVE YOU CIA ACCESSIn post 584, Vaxkiller wrote:Ill be your spy hunter, but be aware, my spy hunting can go all the way to the top.
0:In post 590, marry wrote:sad that i'm not seeing a wife option in the troops...
HI CEPHRIR IM ALSO SEATTLE-ISH!!!