Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 3:07 am
In post 279, DrippingGoofball wrote:This post is town.In post 199, Roden wrote:I'll have Grandpa's alignment nailed in like two days.
In what angle?
In post 279, DrippingGoofball wrote:This post is town.In post 199, Roden wrote:I'll have Grandpa's alignment nailed in like two days.
In post 312, Gamma Emerald wrote:I just played a game where StD was very passive as townIn post 302, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 99, Roden wrote:StD lock town?Not sure atm, they play passively, though for me to understand them.
In post 316, DrippingGoofball wrote:Salsabil's .gif avy is giving me seizures. ANyojf9802759fcn fq8 d*(498 ??
In post 317, DrippingGoofball wrote:NahIn post 313, Gamma Emerald wrote:SF seems sorta towny so far
It seems more like that other thing
In post 320, Save The Dragons wrote:why notIn post 303, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 110, Save The Dragons wrote:maybe we should lim hockey insteadnope
In post 324, T3 wrote:Not exactly.In post 262, DrippingGoofball wrote:TSTBSIn post 138, T3 wrote:Titus is being so overtly strange that I'm tempted to just call it NAI?
In post 326, T3 wrote:Not sure what to make of Salsa.
In post 327, T3 wrote:I did some metadiving of sb9 last night but forgot to post it.
In post 333, marcistar wrote:hmm
In post 357, GrandpaMo wrote:lol its funny because t3 just pasted his meta and replaced his name with ur nameIn post 356, superbowl9 wrote:Thanks for the guide on how to fool town for the rest of the game!In post 355, T3 wrote:Town sb9:
Very assertive
Switches between slight joking and hyperseriousness
Engages with the thread
Early game, will give unexplained reads but as the game progresses his reads will develop more
Scum sb9:
Less assertive
Fluffs and jokes around a lot, usually never hyperserious
Engages much less with the thread and usually doesn't respond to people's posts
Reads are mostly unexplained
In post 361, Kop wrote:I was agreeing with the point, that you could easily shape yourself to be on either side the consensus comes too. I mean you said that you could be able to form a read in 1-2 days, but if Roden becomes widely scum read, you could easily agree with that consensus and say yeah he's scum, I've got my read.In post 358, GrandpaMo wrote:how do u agree on a meta read when u havent even played wit meIn post 351, Kop wrote:I kinda agree with this tbh.
The same also could be said about Roden when he said the same thing about you.
In post 364, T3 wrote:In post 37, superbowl9 wrote:You're right, I guess that's just how I look at everyone by default?In post 29, Gamma Emerald wrote:lul
PEdit: interesting, I feel like in past games you’ve used a “guilty until proven innocent” approach with me, am I wrong? If I’m right, why the flip in tactics?
And cause I feel like itIn post 42, superbowl9 wrote:Hey I'm a hidden IC too!In post 41, marcistar wrote:shh thats a secret for now yknow?In post 39, T3 wrote:marcistar anagrams to "Arm rats IC"
Naturally you are a rats arm who also rolled IC.In post 148, superbowl9 wrote:How? I've played with titus a bunch and she doesn't really seem abnormal to me thus farIn post 138, T3 wrote:Titus is being so overtly strange that I'm tempted to just call it NAI?These are all town Superb Owl 9 posts.In post 344, superbowl9 wrote:Just seems like their sorting has been artificial to mewhy would you jump to TvT here? seems very oddIn post 227, GrandpaMo wrote:eh its usually means it. im not arguing with you anymore regarding this -- i swear this SHIT HAPPENED IM GETTING DEJA VU LOLIn post 223, HockeyFan wrote:lol? I mean you're just assuming that just because I question soemoen else on why THEY know/want to know the "breadcrumb" and why THEY care doesnt mean i think its a breadcrumb? Me not seeing the "breadcrumb" and me questioning someone on someone whos fishing for that breadcrumb can both be trueIn post 215, GrandpaMo wrote: ur questioning me regarding why i said that was a bread crumb but you replied to gamma regarding rolefishing. if you know that gamma was tryna rolefish > then you my narrative is correct that you do believe it was a bread crumb. do you understand? or do you want me to simplify it easier for u? its basically like a logic gate.
WE WERE LITERALLYT BOTH TVT TUNNELING EACH OTHER FOR PETTY SHIT LOLfor someone who said they were moving on from this you sure haven'tIn post 258, GrandpaMo wrote:if you didn't see it. and people have claimed they haven't either. and i said its a breadcrumb, then wouldn't that make me town? since what titus said not a breadcrumb from ur pov?In post 257, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don’t think I’d need to ask if there was an actual breadcrumbIn post 223, HockeyFan wrote:lol? I mean you're just assuming that just because I question soemoen else on why THEY know/want to know the "breadcrumb" and why THEY care doesnt mean i think its a breadcrumb? Me not seeing the "breadcrumb" and me questioning someone on someone whos fishing for that breadcrumb can both be trueIn post 215, GrandpaMo wrote: ur questioning me regarding why i said that was a bread crumb but you replied to gamma regarding rolefishing. if you know that gamma was tryna rolefish > then you my narrative is correct that you do believe it was a bread crumb. do you understand? or do you want me to simplify it easier for u? its basically like a logic gate.
I moreso asked because I didn’t see it and scum are generally the ones who’d look out for them so I wanted to put GMo on the spotI'm a hectic altIn post 288, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 21, superbowl9 wrote:VOTE: superbowl9
saying this is scum indicative is scum indicative so watch yourselvesAre youNot_Mafia?Don't try me.....In post 299, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 83, superbowl9 wrote:SCUM TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE FOCUS ON ME DOING THIS TO EARLY TOWNBIN A BUDDY HMMMMMMMM?~?!!?In post 80, Titus wrote:Townbinning Gamma.Is this post serious?Don't bother no amount of work will get your scumbutt off the hookIn post 327, T3 wrote:I did some metadiving of sb9 last night but forgot to post it.
In post 374, superbowl9 wrote:You really think Hockey faked not knowing about no daytalk for townpoints? And no daytalk so it can't be a buddy the play him
In post 376, Roden wrote:VOTE: Gamma
This slot is theater-ing somebody but I'm not sure who yet. I don't think the third scum isn't interacting with Gamma at all.
In post 378, Kop wrote:I'm only saying that it could be easy to do that. I'm not saying that he did it here, but I've seen it before.In post 374, superbowl9 wrote:You really think Hockey faked not knowing about no daytalk for townpoints? And no daytalk so it can't be a buddy the play him
Scum impressions so far, is within Gamma, Grandpa, Titus, T3.
Reference to a game that just ended. Found a gun, shot her and it backfired. I believe the color was "Galron shot his head off." Which as I type that out really makes me sad.In post 568, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 192, Galron wrote:Sorry I shot you marci, but glad you didn't die.In post 33, marcistar wrote:wow nvm.... ignoring my knock knock joke... breaking my heart...
hi hockeyfan <3
this is scum indicative.In post 21, superbowl9 wrote:VOTE: superbowl9
saying this is scum indicative is scum indicative so watch yourselvesWhat do you mean by shot her?
In post 384, Roden wrote:Does my posting this game feel similar to Large 235 and/or Newbie 2073? That's how you got me last time, so I'm curious.
In post 389, Roden wrote:No multiball in normal and I'd count a potential traitor as the third scum. I heavily doubt this game has more than three scum either.In post 383, Kop wrote:Wait, I'm either not knowing the full facts of this setup, but how would you know there is 3 scum on the same team?In post 376, Roden wrote:VOTE: Gamma
This slot is theater-ing somebody but I'm not sure who yet. I don't think the third scum isn't interacting with Gamma at all.
In post 390, DrippingGoofball wrote:Kop is scum.In post 373, Kop wrote:I can see your point on it being a town tell, but could easily be scum faking that they didn't know.In post 369, superbowl9 wrote:^towntell for not knowing that tho
In post 391, DrippingGoofball wrote:t3 is town.