Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 7:17 am
yeah I'm gonna add heads talking to each other in here instead of privately as another reason for my very real scumread
bad postIn post 279, Save The Dragons wrote:it wasn't but i didn't necessarily like the fact fb was getting votes for no reason (which i made evident by saying something about it)
sircakez and bell felt necessary to take potshots at me without really explaining why which i found odd
bell says i'm lying about something which is pretty wtf and looks like he just threw in a reason to scumread me out of nowhere
@TSQIn post 378, Dwlee99 wrote:Okay who has scum claimedIn post 375, Thestatusquo wrote:Anyone posting in the thread without explicitly discussing me and std is scum claiming
I'm just going to townread you for agreeing with me because I do thatIn post 304, Woolax wrote:I like tsq's takes so far. happy to see where this goes
VOTE: save the dragons
No, I meant to vote SK but three slots I think are town are voting StD and I don’t tr him but SK’s vote was scummy. So feel free to switch it to that.In post 573, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:Are we pulling the self-vote tactic this early Nancy??!In post 532, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:VOTE: TILIn post 526, SleepyKrew wrote:ah yes not_mafia, the snarky scummer.In post 524, Milobird wrote:I have trained under miltank for many a year for this snark
VOTE: TIL
lockscum
You spelled town wrong.
~I
-Lies
I like this post and I DON'T KNOW WHYIn post 311, Gypyx wrote:nah, i just like the content of his character and the greeneness of his role PM
most major thing is that i doubt scum would do the charizard fake claim thingy
I actually scumread that post because i disagreedIn post 579, T3 wrote:I'm just going to townread you for agreeing with me because I do thatIn post 304, Woolax wrote:I like tsq's takes so far. happy to see where this goes
VOTE: save the dragons
hmmmmmmIn post 315, mastina wrote:Yo, will be back here to read and give reads later but for now just wanted to claim this;
I am a 1x reflexive role-copier; I will get a one-shot copy of the first power to target me. So,if you think your power is pretty damn strong especially if a second player can use it, you should target me N1.
VOTE: TILIn post 574, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:VOTE: SleepyKrewIn post 532, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:VOTE: TILIn post 526, SleepyKrew wrote:ah yes not_mafia, the snarky scummer.In post 524, Milobird wrote:I have trained under miltank for many a year for this snark
VOTE: TIL
lockscum
You spelled town wrong.
~I
THIS DID NOT NEED TO BE A POSTIn post 583, T3 wrote:hmmmmmmIn post 315, mastina wrote:Yo, will be back here to read and give reads later but for now just wanted to claim this;
I am a 1x reflexive role-copier; I will get a one-shot copy of the first power to target me. So,if you think your power is pretty damn strong especially if a second player can use it, you should target me N1.
You shouldSirCakez wrote:tempted to sheep Wisdom so he doesn't kill me
Enjoy being wrong then.In post 575, SleepyKrew wrote:yeah I'm gonna add heads talking to each other in here instead of privately as another reason for my very real scumread
have literally no clue what this means.In post 572, T3 wrote:TSQ UTR DREAMIn post 262, Thestatusquo wrote:How is the wagon on firebringer more objectively dumb than a couple people saying they were going to policy sirCakez?In post 253, Save The Dragons wrote:ok i don't get it
you yourself admit the wagon is dumb
me calling it out as such is just me being honest about an objectively dumb wagon
pedit
i wanted to call out this wagon as specifically dumb because it's what i saw, there's no special motive or anything. just because wagons that are dumb happen doesn't mean i'm not allowed to call it out as such
pedit
holy shit what am i lying about
And I don't believe that you don't have a purpose when you make posts generally speaking.
It's not that you aren't allowed to call things out as dumb, it speaks to me to your mindset when you're reading the thread. It's like, a very surface level thing to call out, because you know its SUPPOSED to be dumb. So it looks to me like you're trying to sort of insert yourself into a pseudo serious discussion while actually saying literally nothing of consequence. It looks like you're talking about the game but you're actually not. I don't see a lot of town players feel the need to comment on how things in RVS are dumb, because they're too busy doing dumb things in RVS and they know it doesn't matter.
It's like simultaneously hyper aware of gamestate but not aware of the normal flow of a mafia game at the same time.
so yeah, that draws a vote.
idr I was just trying to get people to talk more about STD and less about reflexive day vig self voting super saints or whatever the fuck meme was happening at the time.In post 577, Dwlee99 wrote:@TSQIn post 378, Dwlee99 wrote:Okay who has scum claimedIn post 375, Thestatusquo wrote:Anyone posting in the thread without explicitly discussing me and std is scum claiming
I think so. I could switch to Brain but I think STD is more likely to be scum. No one has any meta on Brain but three people are sr STD which they do.In post 587, Milobird wrote:T3 is probably town as is Wisdom.
UNVOTE:
how about you give some reads instead of just complaining about the others doing so?In post 592, SleepyKrew wrote:wow lucky me
I'm screaming every time someone just declares a read with no explanation. No one fucking cares. Blessings and praise to those of you that are giving reasons
I don't have any strong reads and tbh care more about getting to Night than trying our luck voting out scum today. The closest thing to a scumread I have is STD because I vibed with your posts and anti-vibed with his but that's not strong so I'm fine just voting for utilityIn post 597, Thestatusquo wrote:how about you give some reads instead of just complaining about the others doing so?In post 592, SleepyKrew wrote:wow lucky me
I'm screaming every time someone just declares a read with no explanation. No one fucking cares. Blessings and praise to those of you that are giving reasons