In post 572, Dwlee99 wrote:What arguments? All I've seen is boring mech discussion and Cyrus being Cyrus. Closest thing otherwise to an argument is explaining why a low poster who reacted badly to a simple push is likely to be scum and you thinking I'm scum for not having an essay level read on someone with 13 posts
Hey I had a well thought out plan/trap if bingel would have kept quite we may have already know who could be sk.
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2021 5:52 am
by cyrus62
Bingel hasn't helped town. All his talk is bs and a show of distenseing after busing loft to e1 he with draws his vote to wait for reg to get replaced.
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2021 5:53 am
by Dwlee99
And funny enough, you gave me the same crap last time we played
Secondly, VOTE: Dwlee
I'm sure you're a perfectly healthy and mentally stable player, so why are you seemingly unwilling to give a reasonable response to Wake, rather than playing this weird "I'm not touching you" style game?
That I'm not being reasonable enough or giving enough reasons. And I was town and we ended up hard stomping scum in that game with my help.
So maybe this method of reading me based on me not having super deep reasons to scumread someone (with 13 posts btw) isn't effective?
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2021 5:55 am
by cyrus62
VOTE: bingelYou know what bingel could be cult or 3dr party or some scum faction.
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2021 5:57 am
by Dwlee99
Regrider please instead
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2021 5:57 am
by Dwlee99
Anyway Kyo and ru look scummy af for hopping on me there
It would only put him to 4 votes still not close to hammer range.
Formatting seems fine I think you accidentally disabled BBCode.
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2021 6:23 am
by Loftwing
In post 572, Dwlee99 wrote:What arguments? All I've seen is boring mech discussion and Cyrus being Cyrus. Closest thing otherwise to an argument is explaining why a low poster who reacted badly to a simple push is likely to be scum and you thinking I'm scum for not having an essay level read on someone with 13 posts
I'm not expecting you to have omniscience of the game. I'm expecting you to put your thoughts out there into the game more than you have been. You've basically said nothing this entire game, and are now getting defensive that you've said nothing this entire game.
In post 578, Dwlee99 wrote:And funny enough, you gave me the same crap last time we played
Secondly, VOTE: Dwlee
I'm sure you're a perfectly healthy and mentally stable player, so why are you seemingly unwilling to give a reasonable response to Wake, rather than playing this weird "I'm not touching you" style game?
That I'm not being reasonable enough or giving enough reasons. And I was town and we ended up hard stomping scum in that game with my help.
So maybe this method of reading me based on me not having super deep reasons to scumread someone (with 13 posts btw) isn't effective?
As above, I'm not expecting you to have a deep read on someone. However, I would expect you to have it if you wanted them dead (which you very clearly seem to do). It is not my fault that you've shown that you want a player with 13 posts dead despite not having many good reasons for wanting them dead.
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2021 6:24 am
by Dwlee99
Loftwing I've explained the reasons. Idk what more you expect from me on a player with that little content
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2021 6:26 am
by Dwlee99
Also you're scumreading me for the exact same reason you scumread me last time and you just completely ignored that
In post 671, Dwlee99 wrote:Wake if you clicked the ISO button you would have seen that I've given a poe. If you wanna ask about that, go for it, but I'm not answering to give "insight on how it's going over there" when I already gave a poe I'm working from
In post 671, Dwlee99 wrote:Wake if you clicked the ISO button you would have seen that I've given a poe. If you wanna ask about that, go for it, but I'm not answering to give "insight on how it's going over there" when I already gave a poe I'm working from
Dude, all you did was list right players and then post "poe."
In post 680, Dwlee99 wrote:Okay, do you have a problem with a certain player on/off my list? What do you want to know?
In post 682, Wake1 wrote:I want to know why you're being so cagey, ignoring my questions and observations, and making it feel like you're sparing no excuse to not engage with anyone.
I feel like you're holding back and to be frank with you it's a red flag to me.
In post 684, Dwlee99 wrote:What questions haven't I answered? I don't think there are any
In post 685, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh, and before you say it: idc is an answer to a question
In post 686, Wake1 wrote:Your posts are only bare-bone to me. WHERE is your reasons for having them there? WHY do you keep just posting real brief sentences? I want to know why YOU are keeping it so brief and cagey. I feel like you're holding back, and it's tripping my gut.
In post 691, Dwlee99 wrote:To your other stuff: Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick
In post 685, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh, and before you say it: idc is an answer to a question
Bullshit.
You can't just say "idc" whenever people are asking you questions, bucko.
This post is bait
In post 698, Dwlee99 wrote:Wake I've given you very clear terms for how you can learn more about my reads. I'm pretty much a permamobile poster so I'm not going to go through every thought I've had that game because 1. I'm lazy 2. That's boring and 3. It's unhelpful. I do respond to almost everything at me and sometimes to things that just have my name in there.
In post 701, Loftwing wrote:
Secondly, VOTE: Dwlee
I'm sure you're a perfectly healthy and mentally stable player, so why are you seemingly unwilling to give a reasonable response to Wake, rather than playing this weird "I'm not touching you" style game?
Wake is asking that you interact with him while you're here and ready to give responses, but instead of doing that, you instead say something like "What? No! I did do stuffs, like this poe! You have a problem with it?" And then when questioned about why the players who are there are, well, there, you say "You got a problem with any specific player m8?" which is irrelevant to what he was asking you.
Read this sequence and tell me it's not the exact same thing again
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2021 6:32 am
by Loftwing
In post 591, Dwlee99 wrote:Also you're scumreading me for the exact same reason you scumread me last time and you just completely ignored that
No, it is not the same reason.
In post 701, Loftwing wrote:Firstly, sorry for misgendering you in one of my last posts, Dwlee.
Secondly, VOTE: Dwlee
I'm sure you're a perfectly healthy and mentally stable player, so why are you seemingly unwilling to give a reasonable response to Wake, rather than playing this weird "I'm not touching you" style game?
Wake is asking that you interact with him while you're here and ready to give responses, but instead of doing that, you instead say something like "What? No! I did do stuffs, like this poe! You have a problem with it?" And then when questioned about why the players who are there are, well, there, you say "You got a problem with any specific player m8?" which is irrelevant to what he was asking you.
If you brought up the full post, it would be clear that it is not the same reason. You're doing a Bait and switch with "You aren't playing the game unless people force you to" and "You refuse to answer questions about your play", which are clearly not the same argument.
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2021 6:34 am
by Loftwing
In post 593, Dwlee99 wrote:[Man, this post is far to long to quote]
Read this sequence and tell me it's not the exact same thing again
This is irrelevant. I wasn't scumreading you for that. Maybe re-read the very post that you quoted as an example.
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2021 6:34 am
by Dwlee99
Your reasoning here is that I am not giving enough reasons for stuff and you want me to dump my entire brain
That's the same exact thing wake was saying and that you latched onto
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2021 6:35 am
by Dwlee99
Reasonable response. To his questions going "Give me reasons for all of your reads!!" to which I said "ask me about a specific one." And now you're pushing me because you had to ask for me to explain my reads. Literally the same
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2021 6:37 am
by Dwlee99
That game:
Wake: dwlee explain your reads
Me: which one
Wake: the reads
Me: no
Loftwing: scum detected!
This game:
Loftwing: why won't you explain your read on Regrider
Me: here's my reasoning
Loftwing: need more reasoning
Me: no
Loftwing: scum caught!!
Dude if you're town your sorting method is awful
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2021 6:41 am
by Loftwing
In post 596, Dwlee99 wrote:Your reasoning here is that I am not giving enough reasons for stuff and you want me to dump my entire brain
That's the same exact thing wake was saying and that you latched onto
In post 597, Dwlee99 wrote:Reasonable response. To his questions going "Give me reasons for all of your reads!!" to which I said "ask me about a specific one." And now you're pushing me because you had to ask for me to explain my reads. Literally the same
Dweelee, my enby(?), my sweet summer child, in that game I wasn't criticizing you for not putting your thoughts out there, mainly because that would have not only been wrong but wouldn't have been the most pressing issue. No, the reason I was criticizing you was your refusal to answer Wake's questions to the stuff you had already put out there.
It is becoming increasingly hard to correct you on what I am doing and what I am thinking. You're trying to correct what I am thinking. Please stop, I know what my thoughts are.