Mafiascum.net

In post 574, catboi wrote:I would be bussing him sooooo hard tho

do you really think you could get away with bussing in this pl

In post 574, catboi wrote:That was the doubt I had but she keeps doing the thing where her reasons for suspecting me keep changing after they become invalid and so I'm tilting my head to the side and going "really"? at the stuff she's saying

really?

It's very weird that people are taking this as me laying down a 1v1 though given I'm not even voting her

do you think you're T/T here and people want to egg on a fight?

who?

name names.

in my mind the two felines are death tunneling each other and I will not accept this dynamic as anything other than TvS

which mean we have to flip both of them unless the first flips scum

i suggest we start with the townier looking cat

your mob lawyer is doing a stellar job dude

In post 77, Datisi wrote:VOTE: innocentvillager

maybe I should just sheep Datisi would have made last time a lot better

In post 98, Faker wrote:Not really thrilled with skitter's start. I instinctively did not like the statements about catboi and IV, and checked it against several games but it doesn't line up with any she's played with me as either alignment.

VOTE: Mare

Meh.

how does this vote parse with you criticizing Skitter's opening?

In post 123, flow trap wrote:VOTE: SirCakez

also im happy to slapfight you again if you want

In post 128, midwaybear wrote:VOTE: skitter

Hi everyone. I pretty much agree with Datisi’s thoughts on flow trap not being w/w with SS. It is more likely than not that scum has someone who was aware of SS pattern, but not guaranteed. Having meta numbers seems a little broken lol

this post kinda bothers me tonally. it feels too agreeable (ok and not just because they said I agree with Datisi)

VOTE: midwaybear

In post 575, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 574, catboi wrote:I would be bussing him sooooo hard tho

do you really think you could get away with bussing in this pl

Yeah, probably, bigger concern would be getting caught out mechanically by investigative roles.

In post 576, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 574, catboi wrote:That was the doubt I had but she keeps doing the thing where her reasons for suspecting me keep changing after they become invalid and so I'm tilting my head to the side and going "really"? at the stuff she's saying

really?

I mean, yeah, at first it was "high number sus" which was so stupid I didn't even think it was serious at first, and then when I remind her of the number I picked before she goes "ok but i still think ur off" and had some pretty bad/whatever reasons for thinking that

But like I said I'm not particularly in a rush to jump to conclusions on her when the game has barely started.

Strange cat, that has been my primary approach for the last year, and it has generally be successful when I put instant reactions aside! It might be worth remembering the scumgame you won, where it took gladiating all three members of your scumteam, several gambits, and a wrong death tunnel elsewhere, only to still nearly get hammered.

In post 142, innocentvillager wrote:

In post 128, midwaybear wrote:VOTE: skitter

Hi everyone. I pretty much agree with Datisi’s thoughts on flow trap not being w/w with SS. It is more likely than not that scum has someone who was aware of SS pattern, but not guaranteed. Having meta numbers seems a little broken lol

I have no idea why this post pinged me but it did mildly

aha someone felt the same thing!! a good sign!

In post 155, Datisi wrote:

In post 148, innocentvillager wrote:midwaybear scum
Datisi scum

Mare town
andante town
Faker town

/sigh

are these serious or?

ok this feels a little fake

In post 170, flow trap wrote:

In post 169, Andante wrote:

In post 167, flow trap wrote:

In post 165, Mare wrote:Also, given the meme/fun numbers of the last set’s iteration and this one, scum team’s probably taking it seriously/coordinating what they do together more than an average team might.

Imagine being serious

party in scum chat!! woooooo

(Wrong chat, but I brought cake)

hi

In post 197, catboi wrote:VOTE: sleepless assassin

what triggered this?

@Faker: To not drag out a conversation that will get mired in meta and make us look like two people standing around some medieval table doing royal mindgames, I don’t think the foundation’s existence is so important that it must always play out as such.

In post 578, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:do you think you're T/T here and people want to egg on a fight?

who?

name names.

IV and Andante have both done it, but I was townreading IV, it's just weird

I don't have any conclusion on skitter right now, why are you trying to force me to commit to a read?

In post 583, Faker wrote:Strange cat, that has been my primary approach for the last year, and it has generally be successful when I put instant reactions aside! It might be worth remembering the scumgame you won, where it took gladiating all three members of your scumteam, several gambits, and a wrong death tunnel elsewhere, only to still nearly get hammered.

Then I guess the answer is stop doing the instant reactions?

@catboi I forgot you were Marigold lol. I think I read you as town that game as well, but you were probably within your scum range. Ya, ur read on me is fine.
Also, I can't tell if IV is joking in some of his posts which makes it hard to get a read on him (579).

Actually looking back on Andante again, she might be town, because reasons.

In post 584, SirCakez wrote:aha someone felt the same thing!! a good sign!

I'm not sure mindmeld works when the explanation for the read is just "feeling"...

feeling meld

In post 586, catboi wrote:I don't have any conclusion on skitter right now, why are you trying to force me to commit to a read?

you are my hero dude

stopping at page 11 cuz I have other shit to do but I'll be back tonight

cakez's wallposts give a townie aura

i have nothing concrete to back that up with

In post 588, midwaybear wrote:@catboi I forgot you were Marigold lol. I think I read you as town that game as well, but you were probably within your scum range. Ya, ur read on me is fine.
Also, I can't tell if IV is joking in some of his posts which makes it hard to get a read on him (579).

I think I’ve had enough posts that are not pure shitposts to be semi readable at least

I’m a little sussed out that you are using this an excuse to fencesit me/wait how the rest of the game reads me

Or just like so u don’t have to effort to fake read me or something

you said something similar in mini 2180 I thjnk I can’t remember if that’s true I’ll have to check to be sure

you can't pocket sircakes

the dude starts in my pocket and i'm never letting him go

In post 595, innocentvillager wrote:pure shitpost

big if true

why can't we both pocket sircakez

Hard disagree on Cakez. Felt pretty insubstantial so far.