Mafiascum.net

In post 573, Nomsy wrote:if we aint limming toogleoogle them lim malakit while they v/la and cant defend themselves imho

Well that’s a shitty way to play and you should be ashamed of yourself. If you do this and I do find your main I’ll make sure that a policy lim is in order for the anti town play

In post 561, mastina wrote:HELL NO.

Frogsterking is among the DAMNED. I trust only CHAMPIONS of JUSTICE.

I don't see why he's damned.

Second, if you could conftown yourself, you might just conftown all three of us but I'd need your consent. If you wouldn't trust Frogsterking, there's no way you'd consent most likely.

In post 573, Nomsy wrote:if we aint limming toogleoogle them lim malakit while they v/la and cant defend themselves imho

VOTE: Nomsy
“Fuck you” vote for daring to suggest this

In post 575, Malakittens wrote:

In post 573, Nomsy wrote:if we aint limming toogleoogle them lim malakit while they v/la and cant defend themselves imho

Well that’s a shitty way to play and you should be ashamed of yourself. If you do this and I do find your main I’ll make sure that a policy lim is in order for the anti town play

Nomsy's post was likely meant for the scum PT.

In post 575, Malakittens wrote:

In post 573, Nomsy wrote:if we aint limming toogleoogle them lim malakit while they v/la and cant defend themselves imho

Well that’s a shitty way to play and you should be ashamed of yourself. If you do this and I do find your main I’ll make sure that a policy lim is in order for the anti town play

I will join you in this

In post 570, Yume wrote:But I have a condition of my own. Your townfirm powers better trigger when you say they would or I will cease the partnership.

I'll claim them and when/how they trigger, yeah.

In post 569, Gamma Emerald wrote:Pls let me try to sort Malakittens? I think I can manage it

It is your RIGHT to REJECT my PATH, but KNOW the CONSEQUENCES of such lay with you.

VOTE: Nomsy

Don't care that I'm joining Gamma here. Scum lim is a scum lim.

In post 554, Titus wrote:Mastina would you trust me and Frogsterking with that role information? Your role applies to your slot? I'll address Gamma in a bit.

How long is “in a bit”?

If we go after nomsy we need to go after tha main rather than that alt imo

In post 580, mastina wrote:

In post 570, Yume wrote:But I have a condition of my own. Your townfirm powers better trigger when you say they would or I will cease the partnership.

I'll claim them and when/how they trigger, yeah.

In post 569, Gamma Emerald wrote:Pls let me try to sort Malakittens? I think I can manage it

It is your RIGHT to REJECT my PATH, but KNOW the CONSEQUENCES of such lay with you.

Oh please, spare me the ego trip. I have reasonable confidence I can read Mala based on recent games. Do you? I will be doing legwork to check behind you if you say yes.

In post 582, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 554, Titus wrote:Mastina would you trust me and Frogsterking with that role information? Your role applies to your slot? I'll address Gamma in a bit.

How long is “in a bit”?

Got distracted. I recall the game (but not the name of it) that you mention. I highly doubt it's a duplicate role or that mastina had knowledge of Sakura Hana's play there. I don't think mastina's play is scum oriented as scum mastina could have easily forced me to spend a fair amount of social capital defending Yume.

In post 583, Malakittens wrote:If we go after nomsy we need to go after tha main rather than that alt imo

No. Take out the scum we know. Even if it's an alt, we weaken scum.

In post 578, Titus wrote:

In post 575, Malakittens wrote:

In post 573, Nomsy wrote:if we aint limming toogleoogle them lim malakit while they v/la and cant defend themselves imho

Well that’s a shitty way to play and you should be ashamed of yourself. If you do this and I do find your main I’ll make sure that a policy lim is in order for the anti town play

Nomsy's post was likely meant for the scum PT.

Proof again that the spirit of rebellion invaded the game
I don‘t do this usually but
lolololol

VOTE: Nomsy

I agree that it looked opportunistic.

In post 574, Malakittens wrote:If this is some type of revenge after the game we are going to be having words.

What's with this shitty ass accusation people make against me?

This is not the first time people have accused me of carrying past game grudges into a future game.

And it is disgusting.

Every game is its own entity to me.

Period.

End of discussion.

I. do. not. care. about. past. games.
My actions in any game are based off of my beliefs in that current game.
My actions in any game are off of what I feel in that current game.
My actions in any game are my thoughts in that game.
My actions in any game have no relation or bearing to previous game and are, entirely, from a current game.

I use meta from past games to form reads. In the rvs I will make jokes about prior games.
But I do not hold grudges.
I do not seek revenge.

And making the accusation that I EVER would is an INCREDIBLY FUCKING SHITTY THING TO DO.

Because it is character assassination.

My reads are my reads. Period.
I can't change what my thoughts are. If I have a scumread and I truly have that read, I can't magically change that read to not be that read. I can reconsider. I can reevaluate. I can be swayed. New thoughts can replace the old thoughts. But I can't magically have thoughts that aren't there, be there, and vice-versa.

So my reads form off of what I see. I call things as I see them to be. I can shift priorities. I can shift focus. I can downplay a read or up-play a read. But I cannot suddenly magically make up a new read just off of desire.

Do I want you to be town?

Yes, yes I do. I want you to be town more than any other player in the game.

But it's just not there.
(I don't know how to make an in-character thing for this, sorry. Too...clouded thoughts on it.)

In post 576, Titus wrote:

In post 561, mastina wrote:HELL NO.

Frogsterking is among the DAMNED. I trust only CHAMPIONS of JUSTICE.

I don't see why he's damned.

Second, if you could conftown yourself, you might just conftown all three of us but I'd need your consent. If you wouldn't trust Frogsterking, there's no way you'd consent most likely.

mastina, please answer this...

I think it's too shitty to actually come from mafia...
Really.

I am about Normy.

Mastina is a fellow fanatic of the mafia warrior code. No vested interests or grudges allowed

In post 574, Malakittens wrote:Why can’t I just be town?

Because you have shown nothing of what I have seen from you as town. I have seen you as town in every state it is possible to see you as town: V/LA. In a mental health crisis. Active. And anywhere inbetween. I've seen your play both when you've had a great many things going on in your life, and your play when you have little of note in your life, and all the middle ground between the two.

Throughout that all, you have identifiable marks of being town that no matter your real life situation, no matter your mindset, no matter what you have going on, remain TRUE.

And they are absent from this game.

I shall RELINQUISH my CRUSADE the moment I can SEE a SPARK of GOODNESS in you but I genuinely do not see it at all right now.

In post 592, Enchant wrote:I think it's too shitty to actually come from mafia...
Really.

I am about Normy.

Adorable post tbh

The chaos of these pages is voraciously invigorating

In post 576, Titus wrote:Second, if you could conftown yourself, you might just conftown all three of us but I'd need your consent. If you wouldn't trust Frogsterking, there's no way you'd consent most likely.

Titus I'm gonna be honest with you;
My townread on you is because you look like scum right now and if you look like scum on D1 you are probably town.

But if I see you protecting my scumreads when I know you protect your scumbuddies, it inspires...shall we say... in placing trust in you.

I'm quite aware that I could be wrong on said scumreads being scum and you trusting them could be correct. But when you look like scum to me (and my townread is based on how much you look like scum) and are protecting scumreads of mine, I cannot in good faith place trust in you even if it later turns out that you are town and so too were your protectees.

So I cannot consent to such a request. I believe for now you to be a CHAMPION of JUSTICE and have asked for you to be TREATED as such, but the TRUST does not extend to trusting those you say trust. Not on the FIRST DAY given these circumstances, at least.

I kinda have reservations about certain things. Not that it matters anyway, since if mastina is scum, I'll probably be dead before I can reveal it.

In post 584, Gamma Emerald wrote:Do you?

Would I be voting someone I consider a friend if I did not truly think them to be among the DAMNED?

It PAINS me to CONDEMN Malakittens.

I would certainly leap onto any chance for her to be among the REDEEMED. But I see not the SPARK of GOODNESS I would need to call her among the FAITHFUL.