Mafiascum.net

That’s what I mean by “fake masons” btw. Theyd be masons in all but name.

In post 5750, MathBlade wrote:That’s what I mean by “fake masons” btw. Theyd be masons in all but name.

No. The very argument you're making gets them limmed one by one.

In post 5748, MathBlade wrote:Disagree with my VP and Galron reads fine

But there’s no way in a 19 P game
Scum have 2 masons with unseen communication
4 players with unseen communication
And a cop
And a vig

That’s a never passing review.

So scum has to be in that hood.

Would depend on scum power, but I do think 1 scum in the hood is likely. 2 seems OP for scum imo in terms of game control.

I'm not lock certain the hood is clear with 4 scum. With 5, I doubt it isn't but I got shot down for that. :/

In post 5748, MathBlade wrote:Disagree with my VP and Galron reads fine

But there’s no way in a 19 P game
Scum have 2 masons with unseen communication
4 players with unseen communication
And a cop
And a vig

That’s a never passing review.

So scum has to be in that hood.

What cop

In post 5754, Enchant wrote:wrote:

Yeet’s flip. It’s psychologist but cop esque

In post 5754, Enchant wrote:

In post 5748, MathBlade wrote:Disagree with my VP and Galron reads fine

But there’s no way in a 19 P game
Scum have 2 masons with unseen communication
4 players with unseen communication
And a cop
And a vig

That’s a never passing review.

So scum has to be in that hood.

What cop

He's referring to yeet, who isn't a full cop. It gets progressively weaker as the game goes on.

In post 2669, Save The Dragons wrote:holy crap i thought i posted more in this game 22 posts wow i'm probably scum

dragons crumbing traitor y/y

mostly kidding but also kind of not

In post 5757, fireisredsir wrote:

In post 2669, Save The Dragons wrote:holy crap i thought i posted more in this game 22 posts wow i'm probably scum

dragons crumbing traitor y/y

mostly kidding but also kind of not

Nah I don’t like how Titus keeps arguing 0 scum in the hood

It’s likely traitor is in that hood with a group scum.

wiki says for a traitor to be normal, maf team knows a traitor exists but not who it is, and traitor knows who the maf team is

I have flashback from this memetic game, where there's was hood with two people, both are traitors. And 4 mafs to add.

Fun.

In post 5757, fireisredsir wrote:

In post 2669, Save The Dragons wrote:holy crap i thought i posted more in this game 22 posts wow i'm probably scum

dragons crumbing traitor y/y

mostly kidding but also kind of not

In post 5759, fireisredsir wrote:wiki says for a traitor to be normal, maf team knows a traitor exists but not who it is, and traitor knows who the maf team is

Quite possible. I didn't see that because I hadn't been looking.

If that's accurate, what does that tell us?

In post 4928, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 4923, Cape90 wrote:but I ask Nero why, have not received a response on that.

prob b/c my responses are in various posts in here. Have I done one big post for why VP is scum? no but I think if you read my posts one can understand why I think this is scum.

So there wasn't anything in the post that made you say that?

It was literally implied this was the case.

Oh and might I remind you that I literally did this yesterday and flipped my opinion?

In post 5758, MathBlade wrote:Nah I don’t like how Titus keeps arguing 0 scum in the hood

if titus is maf then she doesn't know who the traitor is. but if there is no groupscum in the hood she would probably assume the traitor is in there, i think

there may or may not be a traitor but there has to be team scum so lets flip those first, yeah?

Also, a traitor dies when we flip all the team scum so whether there is one or not seems like a mute point.

In post 5761, Titus wrote:If that's accurate, what does that tell us?

we should not base any assumptions off of a random comment that might have just been a joke. buuut if we did, then april town

In post 5656, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 5653, Cape90 wrote:Know who else loves saying that to discredit people

mafia

that's not a discredit, that's flat out accusing him of being scum that's pushing MLs

Insert circular argument here

VP i don't get why you decided cape is town

In post 5749, Titus wrote:

In post 5745, tenebrousluminary wrote:Oh, so Galron is scum. Lol.

???

I’d like an explanation here

In post 5761, Titus wrote:

In post 5757, fireisredsir wrote:

In post 2669, Save The Dragons wrote:holy crap i thought i posted more in this game 22 posts wow i'm probably scum

dragons crumbing traitor y/y

mostly kidding but also kind of not

In post 5759, fireisredsir wrote:wiki says for a traitor to be normal, maf team knows a traitor exists but not who it is, and traitor knows who the maf team is

Quite possible. I didn't see that because I hadn't been looking.

If that's accurate, what does that tell us?

Am I still adorable?

In post 5747, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 5738, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 5736, Nero Cain wrote:cape

Why cape over galron?

dude keeps sniping @ me but is ignoring my comments and it sorta feels like he's just active lurking in this game. I felt like he's not scum b/c you are sorta buddying him in the hood. I know that Yeet said its not a clear inno but I'm putting maybe a little stock in it being an inno but you aren't flipping town so moot point.

Why would that make me scum

In post 5767, fireisredsir wrote:VP i don't get why you decided cape is town

It's because I am

In post 5767, fireisredsir wrote:VP i don't get why you decided cape is town

I think he reconsidered on me at a time when he could have easily just pushed me as scum.

Weren't you in the people who shouted me down when I was scum reading his wu hammer?

In post 5766, Cape90 wrote:

In post 5656, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 5653, Cape90 wrote:Know who else loves saying that to discredit people

mafia

that's not a discredit, that's flat out accusing him of being scum that's pushing MLs

Insert circular argument here

Your responses are really weak. Thinking a guy is scum b/c he's pushed nothing but town is a plenty fair argument. If you and him want to argue that its "basic" then fine but he's also arguing that I'm scum if he's town. He's basically arguing the same thing. You said that me accusing him of being scum b/c he's done nothing but push town (Fua possibly notwithstanding) is DISCREDITING him and its not. Either you don't know your terms or you are just throwing out bad word salad. Your response that its circular logic is lame.

In post 5770, Cape90 wrote:

In post 5747, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 5738, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 5736, Nero Cain wrote:cape

Why cape over galron?

dude keeps sniping @ me but is ignoring my comments and it sorta feels like he's just active lurking in this game. I felt like he's not scum b/c you are sorta buddying him in the hood. I know that Yeet said its not a clear inno but I'm putting maybe a little stock in it being an inno but you aren't flipping town so moot point.

Why would that make me

not

scum

So scum is buddying you and I should think you are still scum? ok