Page 234 of 287

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 3:42 am
by The Pied Piper
We have claimed flavour.

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 3:43 am
by SirCakez
Why, because I'm not your scum buddy?

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 3:45 am
by drmyshottyizsik
In post 5826, SirCakez wrote:Why, because I'm not your scum buddy?
Lol no, are you really asking a town pr to say what they will do during the day? Do you want to be JK'd or get me rolestopped? You are asking for pages of WIFOM

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 4:06 am
by podoboq
In post 5824, drmyshottyizsik wrote:I'm not going to commit to one person
obv
In post 5826, SirCakez wrote:Why, because I'm not your scum buddy?
is you srs?

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 4:29 am
by dramonic
In post 5823, SirCakez wrote:I have not claimed flavor

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 4:32 am
by Marquis
ugh I really want to lynch shotty but

ugh

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 4:32 am
by Dwlee99
In post 5829, dramonic wrote:
In post 5823, SirCakez wrote:I have not claimed flavor

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 4:45 am
by itlepip
In post 5830, Marquis wrote:ugh I really want to lynch shotty but

ugh
He replaced Talah though...

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 9:19 am
by Mirhawk
/dodge

I'll be back Monday night.

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 10:56 am
by drmyshottyizsik
In post 5830, Marquis wrote:ugh I really want to lynch shotty but

ugh
why?

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 12:16 pm
by pistachi0n
Okay, so I'm looking through TPP's iso, and their first few posts that address Skybird have the tone of "this isn't ideal play but I'm not going to say anything too damning." TPP is asking Skybird to elaborate on reads--but the kind of thing I'm talking about is in . They finally voted Skybird in and focused a lot on Skybird until her eventual lynch.

And searching through the rest of her iso, there are few mentions of Axelrod, but when there is, it's weak suspicion/scumreading. I don't see TPP ever being keen on Axelrod.

So I don't think it's likely TPP is scum, I don't like the pushes on TPP.

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 12:52 pm
by SirCakez
drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 5826, SirCakez wrote:Why, because I'm not your scum buddy?
Lol no, are you really asking a town pr to say what they will do during the day? Do you want to be JK'd or get me rolestopped? You are asking for pages of WIFOM
There is a good bit of reason to think you are scum. So yeah I would like to make sure you flavor cop someone townie. If you cop someone like dram I'll take it as a scumclaim basically.
In post 5828, podoboq wrote:
In post 5824, drmyshottyizsik wrote:I'm not going to commit to one person
obv
In post 5826, SirCakez wrote:Why, because I'm not your scum buddy?
is you srs?
Yea
In post 5835, pistachi0n wrote:Okay, so I'm looking through TPP's iso, and their first few posts that address Skybird have the tone of "this isn't ideal play but I'm not going to say anything too damning." TPP is asking Skybird to elaborate on reads--but the kind of thing I'm talking about is in . They finally voted Skybird in and focused a lot on Skybird until her eventual lynch.

And searching through the rest of her iso, there are few mentions of Axelrod, but when there is, it's weak suspicion/scumreading. I don't see TPP ever being keen on Axelrod.

So I don't think it's likely TPP is scum, I don't like the pushes on TPP.
This makes no sense. You think TPP's interactions with Sky and Axel were bad, but you don't think they are scum?

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 1:24 pm
by Cerberus v666
Pistachion, how do you feel about podoboq and itlepip?

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 1:32 pm
by pistachi0n
In post 5836, SirCakez wrote:This makes no sense. You think TPP's interactions with Sky and Axel were bad, but you don't think they are scum?
I didn't say they were bad. I was thinking their interaction with Skybird at the very beginning of the game was bad. But after seeing how dedicated they were to getting Skybird lynched before bashing Skybird was cool, I thought it was unlikely they were scum. Also, the general feel I get from that spot (especially Plot) is that they'd devote a lot of time to publicly interacting with their scumbuddy.

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 1:35 pm
by Cerberus v666
In post 5838, pistachi0n wrote:
In post 5836, SirCakez wrote:This makes no sense. You think TPP's interactions with Sky and Axel were bad, but you don't think they are scum?
I didn't say they were bad. I was thinking their interaction with Skybird at the very beginning of the game was bad. But after seeing how dedicated they were to getting Skybird lynched before bashing Skybird was cool, I thought it was unlikely they were scum. Also, the general feel I get from that spot (especially Plot) is that they'd devote a lot of time to publicly interacting with their scumbuddy.
Do you feel the same way about Mirhawks early suspicion of skybird? Is that why you're no longer voting for him, or is there some other reason?

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 1:36 pm
by Cerberus v666
In post 5834, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 5830, Marquis wrote:ugh I really want to lynch shotty but

ugh
why?
Cuz you suck yo. talah was super town and awesome, and you...are making me question my townread on that slot. I fail to see where you've contributed in any meaningful way since you joined the game, or seen you attempt to find scum at all.

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 2:09 pm
by Marquis
In post 5832, itlepip wrote:
In post 5830, Marquis wrote:ugh I really want to lynch shotty but

ugh
He replaced Talah though...
you coming in today just to say this doesn't make me feel better about either of your slots :/

i know i'm shading a lot of ppl here but with only confidence in mala/post/cakez being town until i pick up on more towntells it's all that's happening

Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 12:13 pm
by Rob14
Vote Count #4.7 (unchanged):


Mirhawk:
podoboq, itlepip, Flubbernugget, SirCakez, drmyshottyizsik (5)
The Pied Piper:
Dwlee99, dramonic, Mirhawk (3)
SirCakez:
pistachi0n (1)
Cerberus v666:
The Pied Piper (1)

Not Voting:
Marquis, Malakittens, Cerberus v666

With 13 players alive, it takes 7 to lynch.


V/LA:
None.

Deadline:
(expired on 2016-05-29 21:40:00)

Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 12:14 pm
by Rob14
Flubbernugget has been prodded.

Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 3:04 pm
by Flubbernugget
Catching up now

Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 3:07 pm
by SirCakez
tumbleweeds.gif

Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 3:27 pm
by Flubbernugget
In post 5719, drmyshottyizsik wrote:VOTE: mirhawk
let's just do this, my read really depend on the flip
Chaining lynches

Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 3:35 pm
by Flubbernugget
In post 5757, The Pied Piper wrote:
In post 5752, Marquis wrote:I'm quickly realizing my drive to play this game has been weakening the more and more this Mirhawk-TPP-no-I-am-the-top-poster thing continues and judging from recent activity patterns I'm sure it's not just me. This also feels petty to say but I feel like Nacho and Plot should both recognize how much his hydra is contributing to gamewide apathy.

At this point I'm still all for lynching Mirhawk and moving on, but while I don't think I'll actively vote TPP myself I wouldn't be too upset to see them gone.
The game is apathetic because no one gives a shit about it.
You really don't see the chicken-egg cycle in this?

Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 3:37 pm
by Cerberus v666
In post 5846, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 5719, drmyshottyizsik wrote:VOTE: mirhawk
let's just do this, my read really depend on the flip
Chaining lynches
Thanks for reminding me. I don't think it's chaining lynches, as you say, but, shotty: which read of yours really depends on their flip? How would those reads change if they flip town? How about if they flip scum? Who else would you be willing to lynch today?

Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 3:39 pm
by Flubbernugget
In post 5783, Marquis wrote:What was the whole Tracker issue with... Flubber and Dwlee, I think? I lost track of that.
Dwlee tried to reaction test me by saying he cc'd a tracker

The results are... Inconclusive