Mafiascum.net

How is this day not over yet.

In post 5846, NanceFloor wrote:

In post 5841, Creature wrote:Have we decided on a coalition?

Who do you think should be in 2nd coalition?

Haven't thought because not sure I trust anyone from the previous coalition but it's pretty likely coalitioning will simply fail.

In post 5851, Creature wrote:

In post 5846, NanceFloor wrote:

In post 5841, Creature wrote:Have we decided on a coalition?

Who do you think should be in 2nd coalition?

Haven't thought because not sure I trust anyone from the previous coalition but it's pretty likely coalitioning will simply fail.

Vote mine then. Scum will be divided into two equal pools if it fails.

I'm too lazy to type all names into a vote rn.

Thank you. That's 3.

If the mod counts it.

0verki11, chennisden, MariaR, Moongrass, Succinct, Time Devil, Titus

That's the coalition if he doesn't

VOTE: 0verki11, chennisden, MariaR, Moongrass, Succinct, Time Devil, Titus

zzz

In post 5789, Time Devil wrote:

Player 1	Player 2
RadiantCowbells	0verki11
mbaki (Moongrass)	NanceFloor
OkaPoka	BrightEyedFish
Time Devil	themilkcartonkid (Succinct)
Ankamius (Pink Ball)	Clemency
Creature	Chemist1422
Taly (Skygazer)	JohnnyEnglish (MariaR)
chennisden	Titus

Fuscosco

- Not in dance, scumflip

Green

- Townflip

Bright Green

- Confirmed Town

Red

- Veto Survivors

Yellow

- Coalition Leftovers

Pink

- Scummy non-coalitioners
Normal - Towny non-coalitioners

VOTE: Succinct, Time Devil, MariaR, chennisden, Titus, RadiantCowbells, Skygazer

Last two are subject to change.

-TL

Nance floor is obv town though.

4

no

it tells us practically nothing and we miss out on a chance to just instawin

bad

In post 5862, Skygazer wrote:no

it tells us practically nothing and we miss out on a chance to just instawin

bad

I'm not sure how dividing the group half way is bad. Second, how would any other coalition tell us more?

Third, we still have a remote instawin chance.

In post 5862, Skygazer wrote:no

it tells us practically nothing and we miss out on a chance to just instawin

bad

+1

In post 5863, Titus wrote:

In post 5862, Skygazer wrote:no

it tells us practically nothing and we miss out on a chance to just instawin

bad

I'm not sure how dividing the group half way is bad. Second, how would any other coalition

objectively

tell us more?

Third, we still have a remote instawin chance.

Alright, when not if it fails, can I say I told you so?

In post 5723, RadiantCowbells wrote:

In post 5721, Succinct wrote:I don't exactly trust you

oh ok
do your own coalition then.

I meant no offense.
I'm a . I'm lost and confused.
I don't trust .
Even townreads (e.g. NanceFloor) aren't absolute, and even were they, I'm not sure I trust the townreads to have their reads be .

I can't make a coalition because coalitions require me to have trust I lack.
I trust your coalition more than I trust Titus's (so long as they're not one and the same), and that's the best I can offer so long as I'm lost/confused.

In post 5865, NanceFloor wrote:

In post 5863, Titus wrote:

In post 5862, Skygazer wrote:no

it tells us practically nothing and we miss out on a chance to just instawin

bad

I'm not sure how dividing the group half way is bad. Second, how would any other coalition

objectively

tell us more?

Third, we still have a remote instawin chance.

Alright, when not if it fails, can I say I told you so?

Sure. I"m doing it as much for the info as I am success.

In post 5866, Succinct wrote:

In post 5723, RadiantCowbells wrote:

In post 5721, Succinct wrote:I don't exactly trust you

oh ok
do your own coalition then.

I meant no offense.
I'm a

replacement

. I'm lost and confused.
I don't trust

anyone

.
Even townreads (e.g. NanceFloor) aren't absolute, and even were they, I'm not sure I trust the townreads to have their reads be

accurate

.

I can't make a coalition because coalitions require me to have trust I lack.
I trust your coalition more than I trust Titus's (so long as they're not one and the same), and that's the best I can offer so long as I'm lost/confused.

Succinct, I'm not going for an auto win. If it fails, we have 2 pools with at least 1 scum that have no overlap but conftown. Do you understand that?

there's like a >99% chance that that's already the case; i dont feel like we'll be getting any new info, and the info def wouldn't outweigh the potential autowin we can get :l

In post 5761, Titus wrote:Then explain why Clemency got shot over both Creature and Chemist.

My feelings're that Creature's more likely town than scum. (However, he's not town to the point of being cleared.) Chemist's harder to read but could be scum.

In post 5789, Time Devil wrote:

Player 1	Player 2
RadiantCowbells	0verki11
mbaki (Moongrass)	NanceFloor
Time Devil	themilkcartonkid (Succinct)
Creature	Chemist1422
Taly (Skygazer)	JohnnyEnglish (MariaR)
chennisden	Titus

Bright Green

- Confirmed Town

Red

- Veto(+Coalition) Survivors

Yellow

- Coalition Leftovers

Personal reference.
3 scum left. Unless scum paired with scum, half these contain scum.
I don't buy any of these being scum-scum.
I think most likely 1-2 scum in {Time Devil, Chemist, Skygazer}; 1-2 scum in {0verki11, Moongrass, chennisden/Titus}.
However, this is largely just VCA beyond conditional Creature/NanceFloor/RC townreads.

In post 5869, Skygazer wrote:there's like a >99% chance that that's already the case; i dont feel like we'll be getting any new info, and the info def wouldn't outweigh the potential autowin we can get :l

This.

I see little reason in confirming what's common sense. It tells us what we already know.

VOTE: RadiantCowbells, NanceFloor, Succinct, Creature, MariaR, Skygazer, Titus

Not very good vote, but all I can think of.

In post 5872, Succinct wrote:

In post 5869, Skygazer wrote:there's like a >99% chance that that's already the case; i dont feel like we'll be getting any new info, and the info def wouldn't outweigh the potential autowin we can get :l

This.

I see little reason in confirming what's common sense. It tells us what we already know.

VOTE: RadiantCowbells, NanceFloor, Succinct, Creature, MariaR, Skygazer, Titus

Not very good vote, but all I can think of.

This is literally coalition 1 minus chemist and adding me and Maria R.

If you want to talk about high odds of failure, the most members of coalition 1 exist, the higher the odds of failure.

The coalition voted for only works if 1) Chemist is the only group 1 scum 2) I am town and 3) MariaR is town.
I predict this coalition to fail. Then Chemist mislynched. Then MariaR mislynched. Then you'll come for me, and I will vote this post and my efforts.

I will casually remind you that strongly held beliefs are not evidence.

Objectively, it's best to confirm the alignments of everyone uncoalitioned.