Mafiascum.net

Honestly I thought this game was a lot more fun because Alisae made these choices. The victory for town would've been a lot more easy if Alisae had declined my invitation but it would not have been as memorable or as thrilling.

I think treating mafia as a game played for fun and memories is better than being super serious about it <3 I am glad we got to have this little dance.

I hope everyone can walk away from the game without any hard feelings because we're all just trying to stay sane in a crazy world <3.

Memorable or thrilling for all the wrong reasons

Remember that time that the all masoned 2012 cohort got super game solvey and calibrated our expectations based upon town not outright sabotaging us?

Honestly
I'm not sure its about the play anymore and about just how I hurt people in the game.
I don't really see why you should defend me when LLD (and now Tammy), have reason to believe that I'm a malcious person.

In post 5850, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Honestly I thought this game was a lot more fun because Alisae made these choices. The victory for town would've been a lot more easy if Alisae had declined my invitation but it would not have been as memorable or as thrilling.

I think treating mafia as a game played for fun and memories is better than being super serious about it <3 I am glad we got to have this little dance.

I hope everyone can walk away from the game without any hard feelings because we're all just trying to stay sane in a crazy world <3.

Yes!

It's funny, Cabd and I also fakeclaimed and we don't seem to be catching much shit for it.

Like "I will value my own reads/enjoyment/plans to the extent that I will potentially gamethrow" is a valid choice. It's a free country/mafia site.

Choosing to avoid you going forward for this behavior is ALSO a valid choice that people can react with.

In post 5856, Cabd wrote:Like "I will value my own reads/enjoyment/plans to the extent that I will potentially gamethrow" is a valid choice. It's a free country/mafia site.

Choosing to avoid you going forward for this behavior is ALSO a valid choice that people can react with.

From a social perspective: If you care about the other people in the game, don't do it.
From a gameplay perspective: Someone being fake conftown for 1 or 2 phases isn't going to be the end of the world given that gamestate.

like in terms of game balance. Taylor threw way way harder than Alisae did.

Alisae's choices made it barely winnable for scum and even then it was fairly long odds for us.

In post 5855, Something_Smart wrote:It's funny, Cabd and I also fakeclaimed and we don't seem to be catching much shit for it.

You didn't fake claim in a way that led town to believe a scum player was confirmed town. It sure didn't involve late-game mis-eliming a couple of town players who put their hearts into the game, too. And it left the other town player in elo trying to judge between two players who had fake-claimed in a way the converted what was on the way to a town stomp into a potential loss. If Tammy's replacement hadn't been a god tier player I'm not sure it would have been a win.

I think Alisae's fakeclaim actually won town the game?

If e doesn't fakeclaim, then nothing really plays out differently, except that Pooky can't claim a save on Alisae when he no-kills and probably just claims one on Tammy instead. Then the same lylo is reached, but Pooky doesn't have to argue that Alisae did a 1000 IQ no-kill gambit; he can just argue that e tried to mindgame Pooky and shot Tammy. And based on DGB's reasoning, there's a decent chance she buys that.

Like you can at least come up with a plausible scenario where Alisae's play makes sense - like let's say Pooky is town, scum believe the claim, shoot Alisae/Pooky with a NK and you not only give the dethy masons an extra night but you also kill someone inside the POE.

If it doesn't work out you can always take the clothes off later.

Like can anyone explain why Taylor was crumbing "Traitor" in this setup?

Did she want to get caught?

She had literally the most important role in the entire game - her staying hidden would mean the dethy does not become a masonry. Instead she tries to signal to us.. Why?

Was she worried if we didn't know she was the traitor we might accidentally nightkill her? In what fantasy world is T-swift on anyone's nightkill list?

In post 5859, fferyllt wrote:If Tammy's replacement hadn't been a god tier player I'm not sure it would have been a win.

Disagree

In post 5822, Nahdia wrote:if you dont realize what you did wrong this game then idek what to say

like, day 4 in particular when we eliminated cakez out of a dirth of other options. that didnt have to happen at all. if you had retracted your claim that day, the game might have ended then!

In post 5823, Tammy wrote:

In post 5811, Tammy wrote:The fact that you are still justifying it speaks to your lack competence and integrity and means you can’t be trusted.

You don’t realize and accept you were wrong which means you’ll do it again.

In post 5861, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Like can anyone explain why Taylor was crumbing "Traitor" in this setup?

you randed traitor and you feel pressured to signal to your team because your role pm says you're a traitor

My big problem with the "gambit" or whatever is that you put your own reads (which were completely terrible) above everyone else's reads and nearly cost everyone the game. It was a super egotistical move and you don't even seem to realize it...

If Alisae didn't fakeclaim it's like 80% likely that Pooky would have just been elimmed day 4

In post 5865, SirCakez wrote:My big problem with the "gambit" or whatever is that you put your own reads (which were completely terrible) above everyone else's reads and nearly cost everyone the game. It was a super egotistical move and you don't even seem to realize it...

Socially its not the play.
Gameplay wise it was fine in the gamestate and town won.
I don't care about miseliminating you and midway as long as the last scum dies.

In post 5866, SirCakez wrote:If Alisae didn't fakeclaim it's like 80% likely that Pooky would have just been elimmed day 4

Whats the difference between teh game ending on day 4 and day 7

It worked out fine because DGB was a good player
What if someone like N_M had replaced in
Scum would have won

In post 5866, SirCakez wrote:If Alisae didn't fakeclaim it's like 80% likely that Pooky would have just been elimmed day 4

Through a doc claim?

That seems kinda crazy to me that people would execute a doc with a confirmed living cop.

In post 5867, Alisae wrote:I don't care about miseliminating you and midway as long as the last scum dies.

Weren't you getting on my case for doing something similar?

Disagree.
NM can read me extremely well and Pooky doesn't know that.

DGB literally suspects me every game she plays with me

In post 5855, Something_Smart wrote:It's funny, Cabd and I also fakeclaimed and we don't seem to be catching much shit for it.

You guys were still lover things so it mattered less

Alisae wrote:Disagree.
NM can read me extremely well and Pooky doesn't know that.

Ok you get the gist of what I'm saying, if someone who didn't know how to read you and Pooky repped in it could have been a quick loss

Also Taylor was terrible this game and I don't feel bad about saying that because they repped out right before being elimmed