Mafiascum.net

In post 5801, Taly wrote:Ugh. I'm so annoyed when I hear the posts saying that more than 1 scum has crossed. Who could be scum that has crossed?

It just feels like a thinly veiled attempt to doubtcast a townbloc. Especially since half the plist that hasn't crossed has generally been on the silent side.

In post 5872, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 5865, Almost50 wrote:@Gamma: So, Scum

must

have fake/falty reads?

No, but I want to hear why you think peta!scum chose to espouse the same reads you are now touting.
I think you understand why I think this is a good line of questioning?

In post 5873, Almost50 wrote:

In post 5864, Ydrasse wrote:a50 you’ve read the pt so what do you make then of peta’s analysis since it was the meat of our thread? also what about cakez was towny in there in your eyes?

I didn't take notes and I'm not about to reopen the thread. I just marked who said what and who they nominated from the other thread and coupled all that with votes and flips from the Mod's ISO, put all these ingredients in a bowl and stirred for 5 minutes, then added the salt and pepper and brought to a boil before I turned off the fire.

In post 5863, Almost50 wrote:

In post 5857, petapan wrote:

In post 5855, Almost50 wrote:ulyana is definitely Scum who had crossed to the other sides and peta is slightly more likely than Ydrasse to be also Scum.

okay, explain why

Because I said so.

In post 5857, petapan wrote:

In post 5855, Almost50 wrote:ulyana is definitely Scum who had crossed to the other sides and peta is slightly more likely than Ydrasse to be also Scum.

okay, explain why

In post 5850, petapan wrote:also tamora replaced saber, not unwnd

In post 5845, Taly wrote:Yeah no I'm not keen on keeping both

Peta/Cakez

Event 6.

I think

unwnd

was a mislim opportunity that was instigated by

Cakez's

drunken inflation of ego.

Also do not think

Cakez's

view of

Ulya's

posts and cross wagon progression in respect to

Dwlee's

wagon is realistic, I mentioned not long ago.

And I feel like

Cakez

has largely gone with the thread's idea of scum for most of the game, and I agree with

Peta's

original case in that he started this game shading most slots.

I just don't follow a town mentality with

Cakez

, most of their replies to my suspicion throughout the game has either been

"focus on this, not me"

and it doesn't seem to be a difficult position for scum to take.

In post 5876, Almost50 wrote:

In post 5872, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 5865, Almost50 wrote:@Gamma: So, Scum

must

have fake/falty reads?

No, but I want to hear why you think peta!scum chose to espouse the same reads you are now touting.
I think you understand why I think this is a good line of questioning?

No, I don't. I AM STAYING BEHIND. These are my reads. You can choose to consider them or not after I flip.

In post 5875, SirCakez wrote:

In post 5801, Taly wrote:Ugh. I'm so annoyed when I hear the posts saying that more than 1 scum has crossed. Who could be scum that has crossed?

It just feels like a thinly veiled attempt to doubtcast a townbloc. Especially since half the plist that hasn't crossed has generally been on the silent side.

@Peta Taly basically said it

In post 5880, SirCakez wrote:

In post 5845, Taly wrote:Yeah no I'm not keen on keeping both

Peta/Cakez

Event 6.

I think

unwnd

was a mislim opportunity that was instigated by

Cakez's

drunken inflation of ego.

Also do not think

Cakez's

view of

Ulya's

posts and cross wagon progression in respect to

Dwlee's

wagon is realistic, I mentioned not long ago.

And I feel like

Cakez

has largely gone with the thread's idea of scum for most of the game, and I agree with

Peta's

original case in that he started this game shading most slots.

I just don't follow a town mentality with

Cakez

, most of their replies to my suspicion throughout the game has either been

"focus on this, not me"

and it doesn't seem to be a difficult position for scum to take.

this is just ridiculous because I'm pretty sure I'm the only one really pushing on uly!scum right now and I've also stated more than once that I don't think the whole LHF-y group is scum but I think they all need to get out of the game so we can figure out if there are deepwolves and who they are
and your concerns on me have pretty much just been "hmm he's frustrating me/I don't know what to do with him/I've 180ed on him a lot" which are all you problems

In post 5887, ulyana wrote:i don’t really believe almost50 thinks it’s scummy that i saw two uncrossed people pushing the same exact thing in a very hurried manner and thought this was suspicious so much so that i am the very most likely scum to them it just doesn’t make sense

In post 5883, Taly wrote:

*blows raspberry at cakez*

In post 5877, Ydrasse wrote:

In post 5873, Almost50 wrote:

In post 5864, Ydrasse wrote:a50 you’ve read the pt so what do you make then of peta’s analysis since it was the meat of our thread? also what about cakez was towny in there in your eyes?

I didn't take notes and I'm not about to reopen the thread. I just marked who said what and who they nominated from the other thread and coupled all that with votes and flips from the Mod's ISO, put all these ingredients in a bowl and stirred for 5 minutes, then added the salt and pepper and brought to a boil before I turned off the fire.

but you marked who said what stuff so do you have like specific posts that stuck out to you?

In post 5886, petapan wrote:

In post 5875, SirCakez wrote:

In post 5801, Taly wrote:Ugh. I'm so annoyed when I hear the posts saying that more than 1 scum has crossed. Who could be scum that has crossed?

It just feels like a thinly veiled attempt to doubtcast a townbloc. Especially since half the plist that hasn't crossed has generally been on the silent side.

@Peta Taly basically said it

thing is, do they say that knowing their teammates are flipping? are they broadcasting TMI that their teammates are across? idgi.

can easily see it from a self-absorbed town perspective which mostly fits how their play has been this game

some dissonance i guess in that they say they trust taly but are mostly bitching & whining about their reads altho thats consistent with most of the game

In post 5888, Taly wrote:

In post 5880, SirCakez wrote:

In post 5845, Taly wrote:Yeah no I'm not keen on keeping both

Peta/Cakez

Event 6.

I think

unwnd

was a mislim opportunity that was instigated by

Cakez's

drunken inflation of ego.

Also do not think

Cakez's

view of

Ulya's

posts and cross wagon progression in respect to

Dwlee's

wagon is realistic, I mentioned not long ago.

And I feel like

Cakez

has largely gone with the thread's idea of scum for most of the game, and I agree with

Peta's

original case in that he started this game shading most slots.

I just don't follow a town mentality with

Cakez

, most of their replies to my suspicion throughout the game has either been

"focus on this, not me"

and it doesn't seem to be a difficult position for scum to take.

this is just ridiculous because I'm pretty sure I'm the only one really pushing on uly!scum right now and I've also stated more than once that I don't think the whole LHF-y group is scum but I think they all need to get out of the game so we can figure out if there are deepwolves and who they are
and your concerns on me have pretty much just been "hmm he's frustrating me/I don't know what to do with him/I've 180ed on him a lot" which are all you problems

This is another problem

I'm not coming at this with a "kill LHF maybe" mentality

I'm trying to solve this game.

It's disingenuous to come up and say you're interested in finding deepwolves and scumresd a townblock that has developed the past week whenever your survival is in question.

In post 5850, petapan wrote:also tamora replaced saber, not unwnd

In post 5890, Gamma Emerald wrote:The thoughts are a-churning in my brain rn and I might come back with a wildly different view of the gamestate. I’m at the very least reconsidering my read on Saber/HQ/TA significantly.

In post 5892, Almost50 wrote:

In post 5877, Ydrasse wrote:

In post 5873, Almost50 wrote:

In post 5864, Ydrasse wrote:a50 you’ve read the pt so what do you make then of peta’s analysis since it was the meat of our thread? also what about cakez was towny in there in your eyes?

I didn't take notes and I'm not about to reopen the thread. I just marked who said what and who they nominated from the other thread and coupled all that with votes and flips from the Mod's ISO, put all these ingredients in a bowl and stirred for 5 minutes, then added the salt and pepper and brought to a boil before I turned off the fire.

but you marked who said what stuff so do you have like specific posts that stuck out to you?

No. I am playing in more than one game, and I am trying to keep up and be useful however I can, so I just do my thing in one thread and quickly switch to another

In post 5881, Gamma Emerald wrote:Idc whether you’re coming or staying. You should justify it now.