Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2022 9:50 am
Why unvote me then? You're so confusing.In post 5865, fireisredsir wrote:1) i think it's really risky to not flip in the hood today.
Why unvote me then? You're so confusing.In post 5865, fireisredsir wrote:1) i think it's really risky to not flip in the hood today.
Haha no way.In post 5874, Titus wrote:Did people claim in the hood? This seems to imply that. I don't want to know the roles if they did.
Titus that answer is literally no one.In post 5872, Titus wrote:I've literally been asking about who could have agency captured me if I am wrong, but we aren't discussing those slots or putting any possibility of eliminating them because they're coasting.In post 5867, MathBlade wrote:Except you’re not coming at it from a discussion of where you’re wrong.In post 5862, Titus wrote:I went over that cognitive disonnance. I'm not torpedoing it. I'm accepting that VP will likely be the lim. I'm just wanting to discuss everything, including the possibility of me being wrong or y'all being wrong. I'm willing to discuss any situation that's reasonably possible.In post 5860, MathBlade wrote:I am doing what is the highest odds AND where every player in the game but you agreesIn post 5857, Titus wrote:Correct, but shouldn't the odds be to the highest odds, even if we assume the scum in the hood.In post 5853, MathBlade wrote:Yes. That is factually correct.
However the entire game barring you thinks there is scum in the hood
AND
The odds of two places scum can never see of secret chat is absymally low
Even if assume kill masons N1 and N2
You’d have secret communication until Day 6 at best.
That’s just not feasible to pass review
Like if you insist, I'll vote VP solely because he and you cannot be in elo together.
Why are you torpedoing town agreement?
It’s been proven you are.
It’s more you asserting things
The more you do this the more I want to discard what you are saying.
What actions are you doing to resolve the cognitive dissonance?
I literally can't resolve the cognitive dissonance. It's my reads versus game health. Unless the rare event my reads change or town sentiment changes, there's nothing I can do to fix that rock in a hard place.
I mean about scum not being in the hood.In post 5878, Titus wrote:That's incorrect. While I townread VP, I'm not alone. There are people voting with me and/or wanting not VP. There's people sheeping me like Scorpious. Eyes is wanting not VP. There are people not voting like April.
bc i don't want the day to end yet, mostly. and you seem more willing to work things out todayIn post 5875, VP Baltar wrote:Why unvote me then? You're so confusing.In post 5865, fireisredsir wrote:1) i think it's really risky to not flip in the hood today.
I'm not certain there are. I townread everyone in the hood. Could I be wrong on one? Absolutely. That's why I'm not resisting but documenting my objection. People can support opinions by disagreeing by defending me as town without actually agreeing by Titus is saying that Titus is town but wrong. It encourages people to keep me, and thus my voice, alive.In post 5879, MathBlade wrote:I mean about scum not being in the hood.In post 5878, Titus wrote:That's incorrect. While I townread VP, I'm not alone. There are people voting with me and/or wanting not VP. There's people sheeping me like Scorpious. Eyes is wanting not VP. There are people not voting like April.
What's there to do?In post 5880, fireisredsir wrote:bc i don't want the day to end yet, mostly. and you seem more willing to work things out todayIn post 5875, VP Baltar wrote:Why unvote me then? You're so confusing.In post 5865, fireisredsir wrote:1) i think it's really risky to not flip in the hood today.
You’re the only one who thinks everyone in the hood is town is my point. You’re actively pushing where scum likely aren’t.In post 5881, Titus wrote:I'm not certain there are. I townread everyone in the hood. Could I be wrong on one? Absolutely. That's why I'm not resisting but documenting my objection. People can support opinions by disagreeing by defending me as town without actually agreeing by Titus is saying that Titus is town but wrong. It encourages people to keep me, and thus my voice, alive.In post 5879, MathBlade wrote:I mean about scum not being in the hood.In post 5878, Titus wrote:That's incorrect. While I townread VP, I'm not alone. There are people voting with me and/or wanting not VP. There's people sheeping me like Scorpious. Eyes is wanting not VP. There are people not voting like April.
I laid out that scum are just as likely in the hood rather than out.In post 5884, MathBlade wrote:You’re the only one who thinks everyone in the hood is town is my point. You’re actively pushing where scum likely aren’t.In post 5881, Titus wrote:I'm not certain there are. I townread everyone in the hood. Could I be wrong on one? Absolutely. That's why I'm not resisting but documenting my objection. People can support opinions by disagreeing by defending me as town without actually agreeing by Titus is saying that Titus is town but wrong. It encourages people to keep me, and thus my voice, alive.In post 5879, MathBlade wrote:I mean about scum not being in the hood.In post 5878, Titus wrote:That's incorrect. While I townread VP, I'm not alone. There are people voting with me and/or wanting not VP. There's people sheeping me like Scorpious. Eyes is wanting not VP. There are people not voting like April.
Why am I a good kill?In post 5873, Enchant wrote:Either way, don't understand why VP is better kill than Nero.
For me it's really opposite.
Just realized this in your list. Earlier you were fairly hard town on scorpious. Did your read of him go down?
AgreedIn post 5883, fireisredsir wrote:i want to see what april and deas have to say. eyes was in the middle of catching up. and i think the longer that scum need to dance around and figure out how best to position themselves, the more likely it is they make a mistake and people start to notice
2) is a decent point but I think sometimes disappearances can be unplanned or relate to non-game-related things. People don’t usually plan to disappear imoIn post 5865, fireisredsir wrote:some thoughts
1) i think it's really risky to not flip in the hood today. we might have a better chance at hitting scum if we flip someone like deas, but if he's town, we've gotten nowhere. and if the whole hood is alive at elo there's no shot we win tbh
2) i think if scum april hard pushes malc yday, she has a plan for today. if her plan was to disappear and let someone else lead, then i think she's partnered with someone else who is active and talkative and can lead instead (possibilities include VP, titus, maaaybe nero if VP is town, and if im thinking objectively, prob me)
3) there's no way the scumteam is all people who are lurking today
Do you think we need to eliminate in the hood? Can you detail your reads?In post 5895, DeasVail wrote:2) is a decent point but I think sometimes disappearances can be unplanned or relate to non-game-related things. People don’t usually plan to disappear imoIn post 5865, fireisredsir wrote:some thoughts
1) i think it's really risky to not flip in the hood today. we might have a better chance at hitting scum if we flip someone like deas, but if he's town, we've gotten nowhere. and if the whole hood is alive at elo there's no shot we win tbh
2) i think if scum april hard pushes malc yday, she has a plan for today. if her plan was to disappear and let someone else lead, then i think she's partnered with someone else who is active and talkative and can lead instead (possibilities include VP, titus, maaaybe nero if VP is town, and if im thinking objectively, prob me)
3) there's no way the scumteam is all people who are lurking today
Not sure work is workIn post 5893, Titus wrote:Oh RL question, are we still on for Sunday Argent Great Escape?