Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2020 2:50 pm
taylor was the better elim for sure tho
Damn it FakegodIn post 5954, Bell wrote:I did and S_S
To avoid doc at DS insistence.
Otherwise would have shot FF+Cabd n2.
Also, would have shot FF N1 but was veto'd by DS as well.
I always made the shots.
I remember I logged into the quicktopic first and there was a message from DGB that said, and I quote:In post 5729, DrippingGoofball wrote:WellIn post 5721, Alisae wrote:Hey DGB, what do you think of this? Do you think this is a strong enough reason for a villager who only has the information in their role pm that they are town, to fakeclaim mason lovers with another villager?
Once in a hydra with kuribo... we fakeclaimed mason with dramonic... we were town and so was he!
because it was clear that it was me that was the issue. i was struggling with the 2012 cohort and i was struggling to keep up with the pace of the game at the time. i was hoping that a replacement could do a better job in a difficult role to play in difficult circumstances.In post 5929, FakeGod wrote:Why the replace out once it became evident you were in a bad spot?In post 5927, Tayl0r Swift wrote:it was very unfortunate that i rolled traitor as im still pretty inexperienced. ive never seen a traitor before, and was pretty lost. it made it a lot harder that half the dethy were from the 2012 cohort and that cohort dominated the game. to be fair id probably make the same crumb as town there.
Good of you to follow advice from Serene's therapist.In post 5963, kuribo wrote:We haven't Serened in forever but I barely play and I'm on hiatus so
Same!In post 5964, Syryana wrote:Well when/if you come off hiatus, hit me up.
The crackability relies on people deep diving past games for clues that may or may not exist, idk it just seeems sketchy, and I’m going to have a clause warning about it in my ruleset going forward.In post 5933, fferyllt wrote:Yeah, I didn't get that crumb and neither did Syr. We both thought Cabd was crumbing loverizer or neighborizer there.
Cabd laid down non-crumb hints about being a miller on day 1, though, so other than as a sanity calibrator we were never going to investigate there.
I also disagree that our crumbing was uncrackable.
I've cracked similar stuff in other games, and I tested a couple of our crumbs with MS search this morning to confirm they were crackable.
It takes maybe 15 minutes max per major crumb, and quite a few of the crumbs would quickly trace back to Natirasha's Advance Wars Upick large theme game where an entire treasure trove of related crumbs were buried.
Good to know. Thanks.In post 5968, Gamma Emerald wrote:The crackability relies on people deep diving past games for clues that may or may not exist, idk it just seeems sketchy, and I’m going to have a clause warning about it in my ruleset going forward.In post 5933, fferyllt wrote:Yeah, I didn't get that crumb and neither did Syr. We both thought Cabd was crumbing loverizer or neighborizer there.
Cabd laid down non-crumb hints about being a miller on day 1, though, so other than as a sanity calibrator we were never going to investigate there.
I also disagree that our crumbing was uncrackable.
I've cracked similar stuff in other games, and I tested a couple of our crumbs with MS search this morning to confirm they were crackable.
It takes maybe 15 minutes max per major crumb, and quite a few of the crumbs would quickly trace back to Natirasha's Advance Wars Upick large theme game where an entire treasure trove of related crumbs were buried.
I've cross-checked with the listmod with a specific example from this game and he said it is fine.In post 5968, Gamma Emerald wrote:The crackability relies on people deep diving past games for clues that may or may not exist, idk it just seeems sketchy, and I’m going to have a clause warning about it in my ruleset going forward.