SlySly wrote:He is playing exactly like I have seen him play before, but lurking more. I think putting zwet up now would be punishing him for non-participation - null tell. I think putting saber up now would be punishing him for being an ass and trying to win a bet by trying to get evicted - null tell. I would prefer to put Llama up, but I am not sure he would be evicted over you, even though he should be. He has pretty much spent his entire game tunneled on me, where since joining, you have contributed pretty much more than anyone else, though Pablito is coming on strong now too. I have seen a little support for putting animo up, but my main reason for wanting him put up was that I saw a connection to your predecessor but I am beginning to think you are town. He was a part of the stupid avatar bet with saber but that is a null tell as well. Snow and Finch have seen a little support too, but the only reasons I would have to put them up from my perspective is their hypocrisy saying I should have listened to the everyone about my nominees while it is obvious there weren't many actually helping in the process. I would put Paltry up for wasting the POV if I could, but I can't. I do find it very interesting that he and kmd have pretty much disappeared since all that went down.
Just from my point of view (because obviously I would not like to be evicted) if you're looking at my as a pawn at this point I do not think LlamaFluff and Mr. Finch would be evicted over me. I also would not like to see either of them on the block against me because I feel that they're more likely floaters than other players.
Crazy wrote:That might not have been intended as a defense, but it comes across as one.
Oh no I've stated I don't think what SlySly did was the correct move at all, I can understand why he did it but I think there's a time and a place to pit two opposing strong players against each other and I definitely do not think it was this week. Especially with Kmd as one of the nominees.
Crazy wrote:He voted for Sens basically because he requested replacement. I don't like that.
Oh I thought you were referring to animopherv voting for SensFan as HoH which I think he did? I didn't go back to check to see if that's true but that's what I thought you meant. I definitely agree that was a weird ass move on animopherv's part. I would not mind him as a replacement nominee, he's number three in my book.
SlySly wrote:Llama is about to go up. I have already explained why but I will summarize. He has tunneled on me for most of his time in the game and he panic lobbied for Paltry to waste the POV when kmd was in no danger. zwet and saber both null tell reads from my perspective. If people don't want Llama put up, they should quickly present a case as to why someone else is scummy.
I think you need to think a lot more long-term in this game. LlamaFluff has been active, contributing, and generally very thoughtful in his postings. I think whatever disagreements you two have about what to do with the PoV and who should be on the block. I don't think you're thinking what's in the best interest of the floaters in general and you're thinking more of what's in the best interest for yourself. If LlamaFluff is nominated we will be losing one of two players that is committed to this game and most likely a player that is pro-floater. And most likely that player will be me, pretty much LlamaFluff will be a pawn and I will be evicted, without a doubt. I DO NOT WANT THIS TO HAPPEN lol.
I'm almost begging you to not nominate LlamaFluff. I. will. be. evicted. for. sure. And if you say that you do not suspect me that much then you will not nominate LlamaFluff. Nominate a player who we know is not going to be helpful to the floaters in any way, nominate saber, zwets, or animopherv.
