I'm here and glad that their is only 25 pages that I have to read .
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 7:51 pm
by The Master Hand
Dekes wrote:Andy, people who can mod can play games as well. You haven't posted at all on Day 2. Change that.
If Andy=Andrius, then just know that he has been aware of my posts and we've talked about the game, but he is definately behind and currently on Easter Vacation. I've caught up on the game myself but most of it has been on a case I don't agree with, but Andy does (regarding Tragedy). Hoping to get him to stop being so lazy (that's my job) and give a long catch-up post Monday-ish.
In other news, xtoxm's lack of any input since his vote on me is both annoying and scummy. Has yet to explain his vote, and I want to see a post of both his suspicions and his reaction to SSBF removing said vote.
I've also had an increasing town read on pinky
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 10:10 pm
by esuriospiritus
Ythan wrote:Esurio, are you still suspicious of Dana and if so why?
IDK. On the one hand his Lelouch vote was absolutely
horrible
and evidence that he really wasn't reading the game at that time, but on the other hand I think the fact that he didn't go on the uber-defensive/lurk like hell when called out for his Lelouch vote start of D2 is probably a good sign. And I like his iso 15. I definitely need to see more of him.
Really not liking GW's iso 19. Dekes hit the nail on the head with that.
Xtoxm is rising up on my scumlist. One person in a slot being kinda lurky, ok. Two people in the same slot being kinda lurky? :/ Does not bode well.
jmj3000, in the rules wrote:6) Mass Inactivity: In an act of pure villainy, we may shorten the deadline if we deem the activity level is unsatisfactory. You will be warned if we want you fellows to pick up the pace.
Consider that a warning.
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 6:47 pm
by Bunnylover
I think the activity is low due to this weekend been Easter.
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 3:23 am
by lewarcher82
back from V/LA
and see what I find!
jmj3000 wrote:
jmj3000, in the rules wrote:6) Mass Inactivity: In an act of pure villainy, we may shorten the deadline if we deem the activity level is unsatisfactory. You will be warned if we want you fellows to pick up the pace.
Consider that a warning.
^unfair mod. it's Easter, you replaced those who must be replaced, but you cannot expect everyone to be online actually,
I hereby ask you for a two- or three-day extension of the deadline to make up for the Easter weekend's low activity and to give the replacements the time to re-read.
Espeonage wrote:Moving backwards at stuff directly addressed or about me.
@ esurio: Not vote hopping. Voted you. Got told, changed vote to someone hiding.
@ crazy: Have you played with many vigs? Vigs are usually encouraged to kill the people that are being distracting to town and leave the scummy people to be lynched.
@ Tragedy: I do believe I pointed out in basics why LVB was town. If you look back you will find that my larger post was just me expanding.
@ Tragedy: I did point out I thought he was town. I can even point out the specific post that led me to the "newb town iioa" tell that I talked about.\
@ Lewarcher: ^ see directly above. I'll provide a couple of examples.
I'll go have a look back. I don't even remember anyone talking about a scumslip other than when he was being a douche after being replaced out.
Can't say more than that.
@ Dekes: No.
@ GW: I wouldn't have over the top expanded had it not been damanded of me to provide explaination of my stance on him.
nvm the multiple posts nothing warranted more than a sentance.
on esurio
: please provide reasons for unvoting her and switching to xtoxm.
on vigs
: wanting vigs to shoot someone whom you consider (actually: know to be) a town VI is very convenient if you are scum: this will guarantee that vig won't shoot anyone of your team at least from one night.
on LVB
: no, you did not point out why he was town. Unless we are all stupid, he was scummy as hell. You never addressed any of the points made by those who posted cases on him. Your comments are superficial and probably made up because you don't know what to answer. And the fact that you dodged the problem of the apparent scumslip is almost a conclusive proof: you could find no way to dismiss it without using information you cannot share with town.
Why are you even asking?????? Even if there was something to read in Y's post, it would be extremely anti-town to discuss it. We are not blind. If Dekes dismissed it so quickly he has a damn good reason.
You are getting a ton of scumpoints for this
.
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 3:59 am
by Dekes
lewarcher82 wrote:^unfair mod. it's Easter, you replaced those who must be replaced, but you cannot expect everyone to be online actually, I hereby ask you for a two- or three-day extension of the deadline to make up for the Easter weekend's low activity and to give the replacements the time to re-read.
Only thing is that this isn't a recent problem that arose over Easter. Anyway, we have ten days left, no need for extension, people just need to get active.
@GW
Instead of pointing out errors in the votecount you should maybe start getting involved and stuff, beginning with answering questions directed at you.
I don't feel a Tragedy lynch today. It's obvious, Espeo is laying low hoping for the Tragedy wagon to surpass his own. His vote is on xtomx aka in the middle of nowhere, he's not giving out any other reads but Tragedy and xtomx and he's not scumhunting in the slightest, only responding to stuff directed him.
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 4:07 am
by jmj3000
[quote="lewarcher82]^unfair mod. it's Easter, you replaced those who must be replaced, but you cannot expect everyone to be online [/quote]
Oh, I am going to give it a few days after Easter for activity to pick up. As to extension, if I have to replace more people in the the next week, I will extend it.
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 4:19 am
by lewarcher82
Dekes wrote:
lewarcher82 wrote:^unfair mod. it's Easter, you replaced those who must be replaced, but you cannot expect everyone to be online actually, I hereby ask you for a two- or three-day extension of the deadline to make up for the Easter weekend's low activity and to give the replacements the time to re-read.
Only thing is that this isn't a recent problem that arose over Easter. Anyway, we have ten days left, no need for extension, people just need to get active.
@GW
Instead of pointing out errors in the votecount you should maybe start getting involved and stuff, beginning with answering questions directed at you.
I don't feel a Tragedy lynch today. It's obvious, Espeo is laying low hoping for the Tragedy wagon to surpass his own. His vote is on xtomx aka in the middle of nowhere, he's not giving out any other reads but Tragedy and xtomx and he's not scumhunting in the slightest, only responding to stuff directed him.
mod, sorry: I thought deadline was april the 30th, but apparently it's may the 5th... I probably ate too much
@Dekes: I supported and still support espeo's lynch. His last post was a celebration of empty-posting. However, I don't quite agree with your analysis. I still think there is a good chance both espeo and tragedy are scum: if Espeo was the only one who is scum, he would have been fighting much stronger to get tragedy lynched, and vice versa...
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 4:22 am
by Dekes
Oh, I never said Tragedy couldn't be scum. I actually think there's a good chance she is. But like I said earlier, I'd rather have her around than Espeo since her ISO gives us a lot more info to work with.
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 6:10 am
by Tragedy
(Oh shit, lewarcher as the best serial killer...?)
Espeonage likes to lurk around, you should even notice it by then.
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 6:52 am
by GhostWriter
Tragedy is attempting to pass off lurking as a major scumtell when it actually isn't. Maybe in conjunction with other things, but not on its own. Gives her the chance to "push" many "cases" while contributing nothing to the game. As lurkers, most of the time, she has no one defending against her. And when they start posting regularly, she can back off by saying she was only trying to get them active, or that she saw them as scummy when they weren't talking but has suddenly changed her mind because of whatever it is they said. It's a nice little tactic to rack up posts that seem like they're aggressive townie, but don't actually do much. It's amusing to watch her ask others for cases.
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 7:24 am
by Dekes
Stop. Avoiding. Questions, Gostwriter.
@Bunnylover
How's the catch-up coming along?
V/LA until tomorrrow evening.
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 8:09 am
by GhostWriter
I'll answer your question with a question: Why is he more scummy than MB?
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 8:38 am
by Super Smash Bros. Fan
Spoiler: Tragedy
#592: 1. Why should we wait for you to get vigged? Even if we do have a vig, my opinion is that the scummiest (You) should be lynched today with the second-scummiest (Espeonage) being vigged. I want to kill off scum now, not later and I think you're the most likely person to be scum at this moment.
2. So you are serious about admitting to being scummy, as you said earlier. I'm surprised that you haven't been lynched by now.
3. Honestly, all of your cases have been crap (I'll mention three of those cases). You voiced suspicion on mb53 Day 1, but backed down the moment you were called on and resorted to voting a lurker due purely to inactivity. Your attack on thil13 were horrible, originally voting him for lurking. When you started to bring up other reasons, they were very weak and hypocritical. I've also explained why the Espeonage vote is scummy, no need to go over it again. Now that you've mentioned other suspects, like Espeonage, your suspicion on mb53 seems like piggy backing others who suspect him and your suspicion on thil13's, as said before, is unconvincing and scummy.
@Ythan: My reason for suspecting you and Tragedy being connected is how Tragedy is responding to the cases around him. You should note that Tragedy has completely ignored the case on Pinky and the Brain and to a lesser extend, me, both of us are the biggest pusher for Tragedy's lynch today. Oddly enough, Tragedy manage to bother with a lot of your responses toward her. Considering that I am almost completely positive about Tragedy flipping scum, I'm suspecting that if Tragedy does flip scum, that you and her could be related in alignment because I don't see how Tragedy would spend so much time responding to you as town.
@esuriospiritus: I disagree with what you think are the positive of danakillsu, with the exception of his short Tragedy post. I actually think danakillsu has gotten scummier over time. I wouldn't say that he is uber lurking/uber defensive, but I think danakillsu is trying to keep a low profile so that he won't gain much attention. The majority of his Day 2 posts has been spent defending himself against me and lewarcher82, which I found to be poor. Otherwise, danakillsu has never been really active in the game, what comes to mind to me is a scum coasting.
@Dekes: I agree entirely, except that I prefer a Tragedy's lynch to Espeonage. Before Espeonage came back to post, I asked him to explain his vote on xtoxm and why he thought he was scum. Even thought Espeonage dedicated his post Thursday to attacks and defenses against him, he completely ignored my question on this, even thought quite a few other people found it scummy as well. This question that I asked is very valid and I dislike that he dismissed it as unimportant and disregarded it. It doesn't help him that he has been looking at this forum ever since his last post here, indicating that he is aware of the situation, but is avoiding the game.
@GhostWriter: How does that answer Dekes's question on why Espeonage is more likely then mb53? I have not once seen you expressed suspicion on mb53 nor have you said anything regarding Espeonage being pro-town aside from when you mentioned that Espeonage was likely town (And left it there).
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 8:52 am
by Dekes
GhostWriter wrote:I'll answer your question with a question: Why is he more scummy than MB?
Somebody please cop/track Ghostwriter, please. Though I have no problem with lynching without results. SSBF already covered most of it but I want to answer as well
a) I asked you for your Espeo town read that came out of nowhere and you refuse to give your reasons or even point out posts that give you the impression.
b) You deflect the question and tie a completely different player to the argument, a person you never mentioned once before and now is apparently one of your scum reads.
c) All the while sitting comfortably on the counterwagon of Espeo, namely Tragedy. No vote on mb, no pressure, not even a measly question for him.
Oh, and SSBF, scummy people don't get vigged. Detriments to the town get vigged aka lurker and VIs so we don't have to deal with these null dead weights later in the game where we can't afford to waste a lynch on those people. That's the vig's job unless everyone is actively involved in the game. Which is sadly not the case here.
Dekes out.
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 8:52 am
by Dekes
EBWOP:
*lynching you without results.
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 9:43 am
by GhostWriter
Mb is not a scum read for me. However, Mb and Espeo are fairly parallel. Thus why I asked the question. And, yes, I am quite comfortable on the Tragedy wagon. Is there a problem with me being on the wagon of the scum read I feel is most likely to be lynched, who you yourself find scummy?
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:10 pm
by danakillsu
Are people going to give Espeonage a free pass just for not being around? Please read his iso if you haven't already.
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:14 pm
by Kadersalad
Bunnylover wrote:I'm here and glad that their is only 25 pages that I have to read .
Don't Worry, I gave up along time ago.
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:15 pm
by Bunnylover
danakillsu wrote:Really not liking the "85% certain" on page 6. The overconfidence in a scumread just reeks of scum.
unvote vote: Lelouch
Dana can you elaborate on this? I mean with the stupidity that Lelouch was showing, this was your reason for getting on his wagon?
So far I'm agreeing with the lynch on lelouch.
Love lewarcher82 post number 145.
crazypianist1116 wrote:Oh hey would you look at this:
@ 3:44 am 3/31/11 12 hours before the game started
jmj3000 wrote:All the Role PM's are out. Here is the game thread: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=17132
which makes this:
Lelouch VI Britannia wrote:I didn't get my PM from the mod until like 10 minutes before the game started.
a lie.
You posted on 3/31/11 at 12:41 pm, and I would say it's inevitable you checked your PMs by that time if you had one. But it would make sense if you got it earlier as I got mine pretty significantly before 3:44 am and the sign up thread gives the impression that PMs were going out from the mod starting from days before then anyways.
Marathon ended well before that topic rolled around.
Note all times CDT
p.s. insults aren't cool.
What is the point of this post? To appear like your been active and helping out the town?
Agree with Pinky and the Brain post number 193 about mb53 calling Lelouch town.
lewarcher82 post number 274 on those two people who wanted to replace.
OMG NO ASHBLADE REPLACE OUT D:. I liked his/her avatar.
Disagree with the Lelouche lynch since TheJakolope replaced in. His post seems townie trying to do anything and everything to get out of a lynch. And what he is saying has a bit of light to it, some of the voes on Lelouch were due to his outrageous behavior.
TMH has lost any town read I had on him ( sad about that since Andrius is in it). His tunneling on Lelouch (not TheJakolope, Lelouch, not scummy players, Lelouch), just reads scum scum scum scum scummy scum scum, don't throw away the crappy way our easy lynch has done and someone hammer already.
Dekes wrote:Y'know, you are scummier than your predecessor.
Thil, what did you expect from a
Large
Theme Game? Three pages is nothing. You should read Reckamonic's OoT Mafia some time.
I lol'd at this post. Go read that 200 page game <_<.
/eats days old punch or drink it, don't judge me.
Omg im in a back-up moderator game with Reck ;D
Day two has started now:
To me, it seems more of a mass roleblocked happen more then a doctor protect (missing vig shot, missing sk shot, missing scum shot (assuming we have a vig/sk etc.)).
Anyways I'm on page 18 now.
Vote: Dana
Your vote on Lelouch stunk.
The whole, doctor had fun thing, was stupid. Their are hundreds of different explanation other then a doctor.
Lurking to boot.
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 4:20 pm
by Super Smash Bros. Fan
@Mod: I will have limited access from now up until Friday afternoon when I get home from school, since this week, we're having standardized testing and I need to study. The tests aren't too hard, thought, so I will get a post or two in during the week.
In other news, Bunnylover's catch-up post is full of garbage. Expect me to go over it's scumminess tomorrow after I get homework done (Have homework to do tonight and it's late).