Mafiascum.net

Nobody's electing anyone twice in a row.

Zang wrote:Nobody's electing anyone twice in a row.

And your reasoning for this is forthcoming, I would hope?

Tragedy, it was supposed to be reading, this iPhone sucks. But telling you what you missed would ruin the fun.
Anyway, I agree with the anti-Tragedy sentiment.
I must be scum woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

If the day executioner is scum and he's elected again to be the night executioner then we would be giving two kills to the scum. We have enough players that we can most likely go throughout the game without repeating anyone.

1. That's stupid.
2. Why didn't you say this yesterday?

SleepyKrew wrote:1. That's stupid.
2. Why didn't you say this yesterday?

1. I don't see how.
2. I thought somebody else already said it and it didn't apply then.

1. Why should we do it?
2. wut that dint make no sense

Zang wrote:If the day executioner is scum and he's elected again to be the night executioner then we would be giving two kills to the scum. We have enough players that we can most likely go throughout the game without repeating anyone.

So what? If (s)he kills someone the town doesn't like we kill them.

Hey Zang, how come you shut up when I told you to earlier?

Quilford wrote:

Zang wrote:If the day executioner is scum and he's elected again to be the night executioner then we would be giving two kills to the scum. We have enough players that we can most likely go throughout the game without repeating anyone.

So what? If (s)he kills someone the town doesn't like we kill them.

Not with the night executioner.

SleepyKrew wrote:Hey Zang, how come you shut up when I told you to earlier?

I had nothing else to respond to. I told you it was scummy and you went up in my list for potential scum besides that I have nothing else to say until you reveal why you want implosion to be executioner.

ignore Zang mode go

Hey, I just requested a replacement. Ever since I went V/LA D1, I haven't really been as up to speed as I would've liked.
Sorry

Bluh.

Captain Corporal wrote:Hey, I just requested a replacement. Ever since I went V/LA D1, I haven't really been as up to speed as I would've liked.
Sorry

Dumb. Please stop playing games here. You are going to replace out of every single one.

I'm somehow back. Tomorrow I'll be in full control of internet and stuff like that will comment on most of the things.

Right now Tragedy seems to be playing her own game. It feels like she isn't playing the same game right now.

She is my top scum read right now.

As for other people. I don't find anything interesting. Cosca was pretty weird when he attacked SK.

vezokpiraka wrote:Right now Tragedy seems to be playing her own game. It feels like she isn't playing the same game right now.

...Meaning? O.o

Zang is town. His walls bleed town motivation/thoughtprocces/etc to me. I don't know about jason. My read on him is really muddled.

Zang, Magna, vezok, and quilford are all solidly town. CC('s replacement) is probably town. Tragedy is likely scum. SK is scum. Mixed reads on Cosca, jason and scumhunter.

Is there a read here everyone agrees on?

Can everyone post a reads list asap?

Vezok, I think I know what I can and can't do. No need to start attacking me.

Besides myself, The only one of my town reads that would become executioner is implosion but I don`t entirely agree with his reads. Im fine with him being executioner but I`d rather it be myself.

If DayExec has to listen to consensus, what does it matter?

It doesn`t really but I prefer somebody who agrees with my reads.

I have tooooooo many scumreads this game. Will do a full re-read soon.

Zang wrote:It doesn`t really but I prefer somebody who agrees with my reads.

Why?

Quilford wrote:Is there a read here everyone agrees on?

Can everyone post a reads list asap?

We support Quilford, implosion and MoI for executioner, in this order of preference.