Mafiascum.net

Apparently not scum?

Ugh, I'm ever so slightly starting to suspect extremely obnoxious town for ThAdmiral, but come on. You can't just say "I'm a power role." That defeats the entire purpose of claiming. It gives you absolutely no accountability during the night, and allows you to go about your scum business with any number or fake claims/reinterpretations of your actions available to you in the future.

Saying "I'm a power role" is not enough. ThAdmiral, we absolutely need information about you, so that we can track you during the night and determine whether your claim was a lie. And then if it was a lie, lynch you.

And now we have this guy Fishing FFS -_-

He can defs soft claim and, if it's true he will likely be killed tonight anyway.

VOTE: Milk

there is no way you can be town

Ms Marangal it doesn't strike you at all odd that a PR would half-claim at L-3?

- f

Well...

it does, but Fake Claiming PGO as a Macho Inno. Child is Just as Odd.

He is also at L-2 and we only have 4 days left before we lynch scum. There could be many reasons why he isn't full-claiming and I don't think trying to draw out those reasons isn't something a townie would do.

In post 604, Ms Marangal wrote:it does, but Fake Claiming PGO as a Macho Inno. Child is Just as Odd.

I do not follow. How are these things at all similar...?

It's a reference to another game. Explaining how the two relate is hard, though I think Ffery will know what I'm talking about since we were both in that game

In post 602, Ms Marangal wrote:And now we have this guy Fishing FFS -_-

He can defs soft claim and, if it's true he will likely be killed tonight anyway.

VOTE: Milk

there is no way you can be town

I swear, the nonsensical opinions that people let slide on this site. In any sane mafia meta, soft claiming a power role while you have a wagon building on you, and then refusing to give any more information would be instant lynch. It's basic strategy.

"If it's true he will be killed tonight anyway." Sure, IF it's true, and IF nothing else affects the kill ability that might be used on him. But we built this wagon because we thought he was scum. It's ridiculous to stop because he says "Um, yeah, I'm, uh, a power role, guys!" What, saying that is a free ticket for any scum who might get lynched?

If he fullclaims, on the other hand, then we can use that information to deduce his true alignment after night actions take place. He's stuck because it's not like he can reclaim something different. But if he doesn't full claim, then we just keep ourselves in the dark.

There seems to be this idea on this site that keeping all information out of the public view is somehow pro-town. That doesn't make sense. Scum already has extra information the town doesn't have. The town needs all the information it can get in order to lynch people who don't fit in properly to the inferred truth.

In post 601, milkshake wrote:Saying "I'm a power role" is not enough. ThAdmiral, we absolutely need information about you, so that we can track you during the night and determine whether your claim was a lie. And then if it was a lie, lynch you.

You want this? Pay for admission (L-1). And how would you know, or why would you assume that Town has a tracking role?

I didn't mean track in the literal sense, but rather we can keep track of the results of actions and determine from the information we gain whether ThAdmiral's claim is real or fake. If he doesn't tell us anything about it other than "power role," then we can't figure out if it is real or fake.

I agree that we need to pay for admission by going to L-1. Although randomly claiming also has its benefits sometimes, hah, but maybe not here.

In post 606, Ms Marangal wrote:It's a reference to another game. Explaining how the two relate is hard, though I think Ffery will know what I'm talking about since we were both in that game

no I don't know what you are talking about. The pgo claim was made during rvs, not under even mild lynch pressure.

There are a lot of possible scenarios here, though, if that's what you mean.

- f

In post 599, Ms Marangal wrote:Now I'm def's not going to vote Thad, I mean who the hell puts down a vote on someone who soft's a PR?

So at first I thought this was sarcasm...

In post 602, Ms Marangal wrote:And now we have this guy Fishing FFS -_-

He can defs soft claim and, if it's true he will likely be killed tonight anyway.

VOTE: Milk

there is no way you can be town

Then I get this!

Am I the only one that sees this as an opportunistic push? : Someone who truthfully soft-claims PR gets night-killed. Fact is soft-claiming is scummy. Where is the town-motivation in soft-claiming? There isn't. It doesn't save you, and only really serves as a dare.

In post 597, ThAdmiral wrote:Well I could defend myself, or I could just tell you that I'm a power role.

Yes, that is a soft claim, and no I won't be revealing any more than I have.

This post is just lazy. Read: Thad doesn't care about being lynched.

^ ~GC

Keep talking MsM...looks like I might have been right about you after all…

In post 578, Ms Marangal wrote:Between the three main wagon, I don't think I can get on the Thad wagon. I don't understand the Premise behind that one at all, he hasn't done anything to standoutish to me

and I think I'm thinking the same thing he is RE Omens

Which is what exactly?

In post 472, ThAdmiral wrote:I still don't get the soo wagon. If it's a choice between him and beli I'm voting beli.
Is there any chance of getting the milk wagon going again? Can't for the life of me understand how people are townreading him

In post 497, ThAdmiral wrote:I'd be willing to get on sword of omens now tbh

Cause he doesn’t really say why…

Also…
I find it strange that you kept putting Ghost at the front of all of your scum reads, yet you never once mentioned intention to vote for him..You mentioned wanting to vote for Demon and myself, but not once on Ghost…Then you say you didn’t like my push on Ghost (a scum read of yours)..and then he suddenly disappears from your reads altogether until later you say this:

In post 554, Ms Marangal wrote:550 makes me thing Ghost is town, I really cannot see town making that kind of statement

Now, I’m not sure I follow you here…what exactly about 550 is town? Cause I really don’t see it:

In post 550, Ghostlin wrote:Two more things I forgot in my last post:
1) Apparently I'm not allowed to pressure someone else while voting Beli, particularly since Beli's not giving us much to interact with. In his wall post where he quotes me he mentions everything I dislike about his posts and why I didn't vote him.
Cupcake, the mod didn't give me the coveted triple voter role to cover you, Milkshake, and Beli all at the same time. Why don't you work on that for me?

In post 547, sword_of_omens wrote:I’ve never once claimed Newb. So sorry, but no.

No, but you did claim that I couldn't know that you've played enough mafia games to know Town perception because we've never played in a game together.
Which is asinine because you've been around a bit. You were here when I was last here before my hiatus. I presume you didn't stop playing games when I did.

In post 554, Ms Marangal wrote:I'm not catching the Crumbs your talking about.

Heh.. déjà vu….i guess this is a repeat of Pokemon, huh?

In post 599, Ms Marangal wrote:Now I'm def's not going to vote Thad, I mean who the hell puts down a vote on someone who soft's a PR?

Umm..is this a double standard here? Cause that’s what you were planning to do without a second thought… I think it’s funny that you would try to use that as your main reason not to vote ThAd..

In post 596, Iecerint wrote:

In post 511, Iecerint wrote:SoO, it looks like you were bothered by Ghostlin's indicating that you didn't vote in your post, but it didn't bother you when I basically asked you the same question (albeit in a much less inflammatory fashion)?

Reposting this for SoO

Your question didn’t bother me because of the way it was asked, and that I saw you as the town on my wagon..you know how I play and I saw it as you trying to get a better read on me..whereas Ghostlin was just being an ass about it..he was claiming that I was calling out the scum team but not voting when he knew damn well I was being sarcastic..so yeh, his statement bothered me a bit more than yours. Although, I think it’s totally sweet that he wants me to be his little cupcake…


*****
TLDR:
So yeh...liking my reads where they are
I don’t like the association between MsM and ThAd either..
She states that she originally likes my initial vote on Milkshake..i get heat from a few people for it saying that I’m copyrighting over their reasons. She then backs off and calls me scum for attacking Ghost (her scumread) and states that she’s in agreement with ThAd about me (Which ThAd never even clarified his reasoning). She conveniently puts Ghost as her first choice in scum, yet never once votes for him, or even mentions wanting to vote for him. But instead later comes back and states that he’s town for a post about not being able to triple vote. In her #578 She also states that she doesn’t understand the ThAd wagon, and is looking for a reason to stay off of it , which she conveniently finds in her #599, however, she has already mentioned that she would be moving her vote to a soft-claimed, which is pretty hypocritical. And yes, she knows damn well Demon is not getting lynched today…

I’m good with Ghost and MsM with ThAd being distant third…
i think ThAd has a better chance of flipping scum if MsM does...
Apparently no one is listening to me about Ghost…
And I’d prefer MsM over ThAd…

In post 612, GoodCop_BadCop wrote:Why aren't we lynching SoO?

probably because i am town.

So...

I'm awkwardly defending one buddy, while awkwardly distancing from another?

GTFO, you know I'm a better scum-player than that

glad to know that you aren't ignoring me though

I didn't have Ghost as first pick, never did. I had the three of you pretty much on equal footing and I couldn't figure out why I was scum-reading him, and I didn't like how you decided to go after him over me despite thinking I was scum.

and, you know, having two scum-reads start 1v1'ing really makes a person reconsider their reads, I backed down because I felt you were the scummier of the two

and yeah, I don't want to vote Thad, and I don't like the reasons on Thad scum. I think he's town, I don't understand the wagon on him, and I think it's shit. I also like to think that, as scum, he'd be more open and would show more care towards getting lynched cuz, you know, scum suffer more from getting lynched than town. Especially early on...

and I was never going to vote Thad, he stayed close to the top of my town-reads for a good amount of the game, who was the PR soft I was going to vote?

It was both 449, and 550. 550 had a bit of town AtE though, actually more than a bit and I was talking more about 449. Never, ever have I seen scum ask town to lynch them before mylo, lylo. It's more than enough to make him a, at least, leaning town read

and Cops, WTF is that? why are people so afraid to take me head on? if you don't like what I'm doing then question me? like, seriously

Ffery, yeah that and I can't really find anything scum-optimal in being resistant to the norms.

I still find Mara’s liking SOO for his “detailed reasoning” (when all it was was a regurgitation of everything that had already been posted) then backtracking when the heat got to him looks pretty scummy.

In post 343, Selkies wrote:Why is self preservation scummy exactly that's stupid

'cause scum need to survive.


prob has nothing to do with anything but it made me chuckle. Selk and SOO keep confusing me with Ghostlin.

In post 392, Amrun wrote:If Ghostlin flips

red

, Selkies is town. Period.

and you know that there's another color in play here how?

In post 482, sword_of_omens wrote:And Nero’s the type to vote me just to vote me…

I'm never a big fan of posts like this. I often see scum attempt to shrug off a vote and that's what this seems like. So with his regurgitation of the Milk case and then this, its looking like scum to me.

In post 585, Selkies wrote:

In post 583, Nero Cain wrote:What kind of town gets called scum and is all like “OK!!!”

Someone who is more interested in finding a player who could be town than in a potential vote on their own bandwagon.

Its not like scum ever do this.


On my reread:
THAD is being a lilttle too fluffy for my tastes.
I like Milk paring of a Beli/Thad team but her dumb push to get me to vote for Matt is hard to ignore.

As of now I’m thinking that the three scum are within.
sword_of_omens
milkshake
Amrun
Selkies
Ms Marangal
ThAdmiral

In post 616, Ms Marangal wrote:GTFO, you know I'm a better scum-player than that

not necessarily..i caught you last time didn't i?
and don’t try to play it down as “awkward”….
ThaD's a pretty decent scum player..i could see you wanting to keep him around if he's your buddy..

As far as the 1v1 , and finding me scummier..you never did give a reason for that…
Only that you agreed with ThAd’s reasons (which, funny enough, he didn’t give any )

In post 616, Ms Marangal wrote:who was the PR soft I was going to vote?

So..you’re claiming you’re smart as scum, but dumb as town?

Also,

Uhh... yeah, but you couldn't get anyone else to believe you

and despite me wanting my buddies around, I never outright defend them, nor have I ever called my buddies town. I havn't even called Skrew town and I bussed what'shisface

as for why I suddenly found you scummier...

In post 237, Miss Destroyer wrote:Oh, oh wait, now I remember

Swords, I initially liked your reason because it was the most detailed on of those on the Milkshake wagon and I had glazed through it. there are nearly 2 pages of between those two posts you have stated and a few people have made good points on you as well, which caused me to reconsider. That, and I had taken a closer look at that post and realized it wasn't as good as I had originally thought

~Mara, this is for the above one as well

and no, Thad didn't give reasonings in thread but looking at what happened when he stated that he would be willing to vote you gave me the impression that something you did made you look scummier, and it was around the time I started feeling more certain that you were scum

as for the 1v1, I feel like you chose the easiest attack of your three "suspects"

In post 618, sword_of_omens wrote: So..you’re claiming you’re smart as scum, but dumb as town?

No? I don't think I'm dumb as town either

In post 620, Ms Marangal wrote:

Sword_of_omens wrote:not necessarily..i caught you last time didn't i?

Uhh... yeah, but you couldn't get anyone else to believe you

nice....i like how you're trying to flaunt it...too good to get caught...yup..you really are scum this game...

erm...

no, and why ignore the rest of my post?

In post 617, Nero Cain wrote:I like Milk paring of a Beli/Thad team but her dumb push to get me to vote for Matt is hard to ignore.

You said you like the pairing of Beli/ThAd, yet you didn't put Belis in your scum pot?
Are you saying you only think Belis is scum if ThAd flips scum?

SoO's looking more townish to me. and MsM's losing some of that town shine.

sigh.

- f