Mafiascum.net

Have we lost the mod(s) again?

Forgot I did homework to free up time for this game . I'll have to be here more often (and reorganize priorities) with that last prod.

In post 580, Cheery Dog wrote:I guess I better also give some reasons for doing that (besides wanting to rage at shit), as I'm not entirely sure Jason is scum or not, but he's just provoking me into doing that by not going into more details of which parts of Grimm's confirmation bias case he is actually sheeping.

You just voted someone based on emotion rather than an actual reason, highly OMGUS. "I'm voting him because he keeps accusing me."

people like Trollie fluffing a majority of the time

I'd say Trollie is basically the exact opposite of fluffing, most of his posts are so to the point they have almost negative content.

In post 592, TheIrishPope wrote:You see? That right there is Town frustration. Don't lynch him

Except scum is more likely to OMGUS like that usually. Town knows they're town, Scum wants desperately to appear Town and gets upset and ragey because it doesn't work.

In post 598, fferyllt wrote:I think you're wrong about cheery.

In post 599, TheIrishPope wrote:I think you're wrong about cheery.

Compelling arguments ft. TheIrishPope

Seems Towner than Kue at least though, not that that's hard.

OMGUS is a nulltell. Scum gets angry and ragey; Town gets upset and heartbroken and sad.

In post 604, Lynx_Shine wrote:Compelling arguments ft.

ISO me. I'm not repeating myself.

In post 606, fferyllt wrote:

In post 604, Lynx_Shine wrote:Compelling arguments ft.

ISO me. I'm not repeating myself.

No that was only against TIP basically quoting you in an argument, when I know very little about why he finds Cheery scum. I have no issues with your quote at all and I'd be surprised if you restated your stance instead of expecting me to read for myself.

In post 605, TheIrishPope wrote:OMGUS is a nulltell. Scum gets angry and ragey; Town gets upset and heartbroken and sad.

Missed this actually whoops. His posts seem pretty angry to me though? Capslock and swearing isn't usually a sign of sad, it's rage.

Not angry, but bothered. Subtle difference, but it's there. I see it.

In post 604, Lynx_Shine wrote:You just voted someone based on emotion rather than an actual reason, highly OMGUS. "I'm voting him because he keeps accusing me."

Actually it'
s mostly because he keeps avoiding my question, which paired with the fact he's then accusing me (yes it is part of the reason) of not scumhunting, when he's clearly not actually going to help me progress on that point. (ie answer my question so I might actually be able to tell where's he is coming from) So the vote came as I'm not sure of his alignment, and his is refusing to help me determine it - which does make it point more scum, but I never know with Jason.

Just admit your OMGUS'ing me

The case as a whole looks pretty solid, i'm not going to go back through all of it when YOU haven't even gone through it all properly.

You're officially a scum read now, thanks for your help Jason.

In post 611, JasonWazza wrote: when YOU haven't even gone through it all properly.

This (was directed at Cheery Dog) is very true.

Cheery Dog's case (you can't really call it that) against JasonWazza sucks donkeyballs by the way.

He's asking for why JasonWazza is sheeping me, asking for specific parts of my argumentation, in order to assess Jason's scumminess. How the hell does that consitute scumhunting? It's just a question that makes the person having to answer it go through a hassle. Nothing more than that.
What use is it to ask someone to make a selection of someone else's arguments aside from assuming he won't want to bother and then call him out on that? Scum can copy/paste a selection just as easily as town. The entire question was pointless to begin with, let alone the case following it.

And if Cheery Dog truly cared about arguments, he would have responded to mine in a more satisfactory way.

The guy is scum people. Seriously.

Not so sure on my fferyllt read anymore, the distancing is becoming more convincing by the minute, but she's still my main second scumread. The others are acting/have acted too townishly in comparison.

Nooo he ain't scum

How do you get enjoyment out of playing the game this way?

I'm trying to defend Cheery Dog, who's a Townie about to get mislynched. I am enjoying it, believe me. Please unvote.

Provide arguments that make sense if you really want to defend him.
All you did so far was call him town, and call his "frustration" seemingly townish.

By the way, weren't you going to give reads on people or something?

Well, the wagon on Cheery Dog is shit for two reasons:
1. It practically grew overnight and you three put him to L-1 without any prior discussion. The fact that ffery voted and then you all followed asserts to me that either Jason or Grimgroove is scum.
2. Let's see the reason for ffery's vote in the first place, alright? Lemme see... Oh! There is no reason. You guys voted CD for shit because he was lynch bait and all of you know it.

You didn't read the game. Please replace out if you're not planning to do that.

Jason raged at ffery. Ffery voted Cheery. Did I miss anything?

Yes, you missed some stuff.

In post 619, TheIrishPope wrote:Well, the wagon on Cheery Dog is shit for two reasons:
1. It practically grew overnight and you three put him to L-1 without any prior discussion. The fact that ffery voted and then you all followed asserts to me that either Jason or Grimgroove is scum.
2. Let's see the reason for ffery's vote in the first place, alright? Lemme see... Oh! There is no reason. You guys voted CD for shit because he was lynch bait and all of you know it.

I was at L-1, wasn't I? Why would they move off me if they are scum?

Or do you think I am scum too and scum would vote as a bloc so early?

In post 622, Grimgroove wrote:Yes, you missed some stuff.

Enlighten me, Sensei.

In post 623, fferyllt wrote: I was at L-1, wasn't I? Why would they move off me if they are scum?

Or do you think I am scum too and scum would vote as a bloc so early?

WIFOM. You see, questions like that do not sit well with me. I do not see the Town motivation behind them. Why would they unvote? I do not know, ask them. Do I think you are scum? Possibly. My reads are shaky at the moment.