Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 4:22 pm**

Oh, I agree. Still worth debating though.

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 4:22 pm**

Oh, I agree(@Part 2). Still worth debating though

Ebwop

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 4:28 pm**

the amished tell isn't mentioning your predecessor, and it's a shitty fucking tell that was never really a tell anyway

i'm sure it's been used to mislynch more than it has to correctly lynch scum using the "tell"

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 4:30 pm**

UNVOTE: DB
VOTE: notscience

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 4:31 pm**

Welcome back. You left your umbrella.

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 4:31 pm**

yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah you're gonna need to do a little more than that if you sincerely want a notscience lynch with 2 days to go to the deadline

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 4:35 pm**

In post 603, artemiskitty wrote:UNVOTE: DB
VOTE: notscience

Your propensity for naked votes is starting to bug me a little.

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:08 pm**

In post 606, Sound of Silence wrote:
In post 603, artemiskitty wrote:UNVOTE: DB
VOTE: notscience
Your propensity for naked votes is starting to bug me a little.

sorry :/

just not that sure of Daniel Brown as being scum, despite nacho-hydra being certain.

i don't think Titus looks as bad as NS is making him out to be

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:10 pm**

In post 607, artemiskitty wrote:
In post 606, Sound of Silence wrote:
In post 603, artemiskitty wrote:UNVOTE: DB
VOTE: notscience
Your propensity for naked votes is starting to bug me a little.
sorry :/

just not that sure of Daniel Brown as being scum, despite nacho-hydra being certain.

i don't think Titus looks as bad as NS is making him out to be

What's your nacho-hydra read?

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:11 pm**

just realized that Titus is actually Fuzdn, who i was very securely thinking that he was town, as well.

plus, NS's first post and reads, were bad. can't really get over that

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:12 pm**

In post 608, Sound of Silence wrote:
In post 607, artemiskitty wrote:
In post 606, Sound of Silence wrote:
In post 603, artemiskitty wrote:UNVOTE: DB
VOTE: notscience
Your propensity for naked votes is starting to bug me a little.
sorry :/

just not that sure of Daniel Brown as being scum, despite nacho-hydra being certain.

i don't think Titus looks as bad as NS is making him out to be
What's your nacho-hydra read?

i like them for town.

i also like rail tracer very much for town. brian skies too.

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:12 pm**

SOS, what's your read on NS?

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:35 pm**

Am I talking to Mala or Mantis? Either way I love you. I don't think the ns case will happen before deadline though.

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:57 pm**

NS, 1) I have not been fluffy. 2) My play has been the opposite of Amished. Fu voted rt. I liked the vote there. 3) I am not ignoring half the players.

I am down for an ns train. I still will hammer db if needed but I like ns scum too.

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:58 pm**

In post 611, artemiskitty wrote:SOS, what's your read on NS?

I think some of the stuff he's said about Titus is valid, but he's really scraping the barrel with some of it too. The amished thing in particular.

I'm overall not liking ns atm, but tbh I will rely quite a bit on GiF's read with him.

What are your thoughts about Mario?

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 10:59 pm**

Titus: I suppose that you and DB have two different plans. Also, you are slowly backtracking on your RT read in a way I don't like.
AK: we have a very good DB-lynch coming, and you unvote. Okay, then, I reput him on

L-1

, and I leave the hammer to Titus (or Mario, no comment needed.)
UNVOTE: Brian
VOTE: Daniel

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 11:20 pm**

In post 610, artemiskitty wrote:
In post 608, Sound of Silence wrote:
In post 607, artemiskitty wrote:
In post 606, Sound of Silence wrote:
In post 603, artemiskitty wrote:UNVOTE: DB
VOTE: notscience
Your propensity for naked votes is starting to bug me a little.
sorry :/

just not that sure of Daniel Brown as being scum, despite nacho-hydra being certain.

i don't think Titus looks as bad as NS is making him out to be
What's your nacho-hydra read?
i like them for town.

i also like rail tracer very much for town. brian skies too.

I forgot to say. You named off the core of my townbloc here. Next level of certainty is Nati. I've had niggles about you, but your naming off the same core here puts you in the Nati level as well.

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 11:22 pm**

Dessew's nearly in that 2nd group.

Posted: **Sat Sep 21, 2013 11:53 pm**

Only in level 2?

I even went and did the raid boss solo to power level.

I'm taking DB's complete and utter silence the last few days as admission of guilt, BTW.

So, plan tomorrow: get the thinktank going and lynch notscience. Hope you're with us nacho!

{SoS, Rail Tracer} not lynching
{Rebel, Dessew, Titus, Brian Skies, Artemis Kitty} need a really strong case
{Mario, Mogamma, HP-slot} come chat some time
{Notscience} kill it

Posted: **Sun Sep 22, 2013 2:37 am**

In post 591, Dessew wrote:My theory is that (they might be scumbuddies and) DB thought it was a counterwagon attempt and Titus will come up with an actual case. He didn't know that Titus wanted to dive deeply into nullishness, so he won't post any case. But he later clinged to his RT-vote, because the connection either would be unnoticed or would be considered so obvious that Titus gets towncred. So I'm saying that if Daniel flips scum, I'm willing to lynch Titus tomorrow.

I like your theory. Scum aren't expected to vote in blocks here (even during a counterwagon attempt), so I'm not sure that DB would expect that his buddy was making the counterwagon case for him or follow along so quickly, but this shows an independent thought process that I was hoping to see before.

In post 598, notscience wrote:I see it as a response to the comment of her playing fluff-like such as her predecessor.

It is, but that's a defense to an accusation.

In post 602, Rail Tracer wrote:i'm sure it's been used to mislynch more than it has to correctly lynch scum using the "tell"

Lately. It certainly did have a hell of a heyday though.

In post 606, Sound of Silence wrote:
In post 603, artemiskitty wrote:UNVOTE: DB
VOTE: notscience
Your propensity for naked votes is starting to bug me a little.

Are you really that bad at reading mantis?

Posted: **Sun Sep 22, 2013 2:40 am**

Vote Count of the First City, Eleventh Block

Players Alive: 13
Votes to Lynch: 7
Format of:
Wagon (size): Voters on wagon

Rail Tracer (2): Titus, Daniel Bryan (L-5)
Dessew (1): Notscience (L-6)

Daniel Bryan (6): Rebel Without a Pulse, Rail Tracer. Brian Skies, Sound of Silence, Natirasha, Dessew (L-1)

Natirasha (1): Humble Poirot (L-6)
Mario and the Diamonds (1): Mogamma (L-6)
notscience (1): artemiskitty (L-6)
Not voting: Mario and the Diamonds

Deadline for Day One falls on: 9/23/13 which is (expired on 2013-09-23 19:00:00)

Mod notes:

~Cabd sucks

Can I talk about how awesome this wagon is?

Posted: **Sun Sep 22, 2013 2:42 am**

In post 617, Sound of Silence wrote:Dessew's nearly in that 2nd group.

Wait, what do your reads look like?

In post 618, Natirasha wrote:Hope you're with us nacho!

That would be cool, yeah.

Posted: **Sun Sep 22, 2013 3:05 am**

Dessew, your reasoning suggests you are starting from a premise, Titus is scum and working from there. It is normal for reads to change over time.

Ak's read depends on if ns is scum. If db flips town and ns flips scum, that slot will be near conftown.

VOTE: notscience

Will hammer db if needed when I go to bed. NS needs rope though.

Posted: **Sun Sep 22, 2013 5:47 am**

elaborate on why you think "ns needs rope"

Posted: **Sun Sep 22, 2013 5:49 am**

that's your first mention of ns as far as i can tell (outside of responses to him). is that just sheeping ak's vote or do you have your own reasons?

Mafiascum.net

Mini 1496: The Cash Cabd (Game Over)