Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:09 pm
UNVOTE:
VOTE: rufflig
VOTE: rufflig
@ Mafia
somehow skimmed over your answer sorry
Page 25 of 89
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:11 pm
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:12 pm
Mind if I ask, why?
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:13 pm
Apparently when playing with SSK all votes need to be accompanied with giant walls of text.
On other news I have real life issues and haven't been able to attend this game nor will be able to tomorrow (full day work on a Saturday FML), and giffy's sick so prob. wont see anything from us until Sunday.
PEd: Oh and apparently Tammy's worth asking "why" and we arent even worth asking "why" \:D/
On other news I have real life issues and haven't been able to attend this game nor will be able to tomorrow (full day work on a Saturday FML), and giffy's sick so prob. wont see anything from us until Sunday.
PEd: Oh and apparently Tammy's worth asking "why" and we arent even worth asking "why" \:D/
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:13 pm
going back to my first gut read.
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:15 pm
Every single game I'm a little different. I'm not a robot.In post 597, MafiaSSK wrote:I never know with you though. I read you as town for the most part, but this game you've seemed off.In post 593, Deacon Blues wrote:Because you're not even trying to read me.
And this hydra is a new collaboration. We get along pretty well, I think, but I can tell that my reads are more generous than bork's are. That's probably a good thing.
I want to learn how to read you on my own. I have not seen you put as much heart and soul into a game since, as you did in Paradox Prime. I misread you in that game, and so did ViTierce. And that combination led to your lynch.
I don't like repeating mistakes like that. So, give me some data that can lead to a better read, and I'll try to do the same.
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:16 pm
No. They need to be made with more than one sentence behind them. Which they all weren't.In post 603, Minami no Hana wrote:Apparently when playing with SSK all votes need to be accompanied with giant walls of text.
On other news I have real life issues and haven't been able to attend this game nor will be able to tomorrow (full day work on a Saturday FML), and giffy's sick so prob. wont see anything from us until Sunday.
PEd: Oh and apparently Tammy's worth asking "why" and we arent even worth asking "why" \:D/
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:18 pm
I so don't remember PxP. It was my first game back and I was a different player then.In post 605, Deacon Blues wrote:Every single game I'm a little different. I'm not a robot.In post 597, MafiaSSK wrote:I never know with you though. I read you as town for the most part, but this game you've seemed off.In post 593, Deacon Blues wrote:Because you're not even trying to read me.
And this hydra is a new collaboration. We get along pretty well, I think, but I can tell that my reads are more generous than bork's are. That's probably a good thing.
I want to learn how to read you on my own. I have not seen you put as much heart and soul into a game since, as you did in Paradox Prime. I misread you in that game, and so did ViTierce. And that combination led to your lynch.
I don't like repeating mistakes like that. So, give me some data that can lead to a better read, and I'll try to do the same.
But I mean you always seem to talk about how you're different from game to game, but everyone has a basic tone that carries across. Yours here has been different than the one's I've seen you with when you're town.
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:30 pm
How about this
Your comment about No Hana being a more active lurker makes no sense since she has posted alot more than you , have tried to scum hunt and tried to make reads. You answer came off as hypocritical and ungenuine. Your vote on me seems to be based on playstyle... which a better player would know not to do. Honestly this seems like an attack on me bc I questioned if you were scum and were possible going to vote for you. As for your excuse for not replacing out I just dont buy it.... Your vote on Hana seems like a bit of a stretch. Sorry but I am reading you as scum
VOTE: MafiaSSK
Your comment about No Hana being a more active lurker makes no sense since she has posted alot more than you , have tried to scum hunt and tried to make reads. You answer came off as hypocritical and ungenuine. Your vote on me seems to be based on playstyle... which a better player would know not to do. Honestly this seems like an attack on me bc I questioned if you were scum and were possible going to vote for you. As for your excuse for not replacing out I just dont buy it.... Your vote on Hana seems like a bit of a stretch. Sorry but I am reading you as scum
VOTE: MafiaSSK
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:42 pm
There we go. That's a good block that I respect. But the reasons inside are a bunch of crap. Let's break this up ya'll.In post 608, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:How about this
Your comment about No Hana being a more active lurker makes no sense since she has posted alot more than you , have tried to scum hunt and tried to make reads. You answer came off as hypocritical and ungenuine. Your vote on me seems to be based on playstyle... which a better player would know not to do. Honestly this seems like an attack on me bc I questioned if you were scum and were possible going to vote for you. As for your excuse for not replacing out I just dont buy it.... Your vote on Hana seems like a bit of a stretch. Sorry but I am reading you as scum
VOTE: MafiaSSK
Being hypocritical isn't a scumtell.In post 608, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Your comment about No Hana being a more active lurker makes no sense since she has posted alot more than you , have tried to scum hunt and tried to make reads. You answer came off as hypocritical and ungenuine.
Being ungenuine, I can't defend, as it's an opinion. But, I'm being as genuine as possible.
Playstyle is partially based off of alignment. So a better player would be able to detect when a playstyle is leaning towards that player's scum playstyle.In post 608, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Your vote on me seems to be based on playstyle... which a better player would know not to do.
That's cool. It's not scummy nor is it true, seeing as that is my reason for staying in. But whatever.In post 608, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:As for your excuse for not replacing out I just dont buy it....
I explained my reasoning. It's not a stretch. It's what I see as the greatest reasons why someone would be scum in this game.In post 608, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Your vote on Hana seems like a bit of a stretch.
If you are truly apologetic, that's bad. You have to be feeling guilty of something. In this case, it's that you're lying. You know that I'm town and you know that you're voting me for reasons that aren't true. You're the scum.In post 608, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Sorry but I am reading you as scum
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:52 pm
Why did you ask pitoli here?
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:55 pm
actually
VOTE: ms. marangal
VOTE: ms. marangal
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:01 pm
I burnt my town meta to the ground a few games ago. I mean burnt it to the ground in a game where I was scum.In post 607, MafiaSSK wrote:I so don't remember PxP. It was my first game back and I was a different player then.In post 605, Deacon Blues wrote:Every single game I'm a little different. I'm not a robot.In post 597, MafiaSSK wrote:I never know with you though. I read you as town for the most part, but this game you've seemed off.In post 593, Deacon Blues wrote:Because you're not even trying to read me.
And this hydra is a new collaboration. We get along pretty well, I think, but I can tell that my reads are more generous than bork's are. That's probably a good thing.
I want to learn how to read you on my own. I have not seen you put as much heart and soul into a game since, as you did in Paradox Prime. I misread you in that game, and so did ViTierce. And that combination led to your lynch.
I don't like repeating mistakes like that. So, give me some data that can lead to a better read, and I'll try to do the same.
But I mean you always seem to talk about how you're different from game to game, but everyone has a basic tone that carries across. Yours here has been different than the one's I've seen you with when you're town.
I think that was a good thing in the overall scheme
I'm rebuilding with the stuff I think is meaningful and useful to me and to town. And I'm not going to restrain my play to an arbitrary set of "this is town ffery" behaviors going forward.
I don't expect this to make a huge, scary difference in my play, because I kinda lack imagination wrt the range of things you can do in mafia. I'm just not going to worry about whether I'm playing inside the known "town-ffery" envelope or not.
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:04 pm
Yes being Hypocritical is a partial scum tell. It means you are not being honest....
Once again it goes back to rather you are being honest and truthful... Townie have very little to hide
True but players usually have a scum play-style and a townie style... not always but often. Unless you know my townie style how can you say this is my scum style/
I give you this one though If you are a scum lurker you would more likely not want to replace out...
Ok yes she posted 3 continuous vote and yes that is suspicious. However you seem to jump on that pretty quickly. You dont seem to care if there is a rational reason for action or not. In other words it seems like you were looking for a reason to vote for someone in order to look like you were scum hunting
not sure how you got apologetic from that when it obviously me being nice..but Ok.. I guess I can see how it could be misread
Once again it goes back to rather you are being honest and truthful... Townie have very little to hide
True but players usually have a scum play-style and a townie style... not always but often. Unless you know my townie style how can you say this is my scum style/
I give you this one though If you are a scum lurker you would more likely not want to replace out...
Ok yes she posted 3 continuous vote and yes that is suspicious. However you seem to jump on that pretty quickly. You dont seem to care if there is a rational reason for action or not. In other words it seems like you were looking for a reason to vote for someone in order to look like you were scum hunting
not sure how you got apologetic from that when it obviously me being nice..but Ok.. I guess I can see how it could be misread
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:06 pm
@ Tammy...
to be honest i am not sure what i was thinking... I tend to have a short memory at times. If I had to guess it was probably to help get a better read on Pitoli
to be honest i am not sure what i was thinking... I tend to have a short memory at times. If I had to guess it was probably to help get a better read on Pitoli
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:53 pm
...i want to vote rufflig again
holding the urge...
holding the urge...
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:44 pm
Ha~
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:46 pm
that list of reads isn't really put in order (the bolded are reads that are fairly strong)In post 583, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Could you explain your vote on me and why you have me at the bottom of your scum list. Your vote seem a bit random
I don't think my vote is all that random, tbh
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:51 pm
and, you're hurting my head more than it should be hurting
I want to get rid of that.
and why is Orci null when another of your town-read (Kaze) is clearing him via role?
I want to get rid of that.
What have I done, up to this point that gave you that town read?
and why is Orci null when another of your town-read (Kaze) is clearing him via role?
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:16 pm
Before you take off for the weekend, you guys mind telling me who your scumbuddies are?In post 603, Minami no Hana wrote:Apparently when playing with SSK all votes need to be accompanied with giant walls of text.
On other news I have real life issues and haven't been able to attend this game nor will be able to tomorrow (full day work on a Saturday FML), and giffy's sick so prob. wont see anything from us until Sunday.
PEd: Oh and apparently Tammy's worth asking "why" and we arent even worth asking "why" \:D/
What a weird post. It's quite obviously bad, but I can't tell if it's scum-motivated badness or a townie genuinely trying to scumhunt.In post 608, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:How about this
Your comment about No Hana being a more active lurker makes no sense since she has posted alot more than you , have tried to scum hunt and tried to make reads. You answer came off as hypocritical and ungenuine. Your vote on me seems to be based on playstyle... which a better player would know not to do. Honestly this seems like an attack on me bc I questioned if you were scum and were possible going to vote for you. As for your excuse for not replacing out I just dont buy it.... Your vote on Hana seems like a bit of a stretch. Sorry but I am reading you as scum
VOTE: MafiaSSK
Someone help me sort this?
Pourquoi?
You're not at all curious about why Tammy voted you?In post 616, Ms Marangal wrote:Ha~
---
Every time someone says something related to fferybork's "tone" or "feel" being different this game I cringe a little.
It's a fucking hydra, people. It's not going to feel the same as its individual components.
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:18 pm
and, back to fuzzy
Do you know what active lurking is?
because Minami No Hana active lurking and SSK Lurking make sense, albiet it's a little weird to bring that up at this point in time but I can kinda understand where he is coming from in that regard
and I don't even know why you're apologizing to... someone you think is... scum...
Pedit: Nope, not really. Tammy doesn't bother me she's "easy to manipulate" and I'll be able to do it with time
There's stuff like this that's bothering the fuck out of me.In post 608, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:How about this
Your comment about No Hana being a more active lurker makes no sense since she has posted alot more than you , have tried to scum hunt and tried to make reads. You answer came off as hypocritical and ungenuine. Your vote on me seems to be based on playstyle... which a better player would know not to do. Honestly this seems like an attack on me bc I questioned if you were scum and were possible going to vote for you. As for your excuse for not replacing out I just dont buy it.... Your vote on Hana seems like a bit of a stretch. Sorry but I am reading you as scum
VOTE: MafiaSSK
Do you know what active lurking is?
because Minami No Hana active lurking and SSK Lurking make sense, albiet it's a little weird to bring that up at this point in time but I can kinda understand where he is coming from in that regard
and I don't even know why you're apologizing to... someone you think is... scum...
Pedit: Nope, not really. Tammy doesn't bother me she's "easy to manipulate" and I'll be able to do it with time
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:21 pm
In post 261, Tammy wrote:If one of you could please change your avatar or at least the color of your avatar that would be awesome!
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:22 pm
we made each other's avi's though
they are special
they are special
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:23 pm
I just finished both a town and scum game for all you meta-loving masochists out there. ;D
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:30 pm
It's an awesomely beautiful stand do you have something against hugs maybe you should get more joy in your life or something. Also ftr voting me will not make me give stances, that's alignment irrelevant.In post 296, The Rufflig wrote:
@Minami no Hana: None of the players I listed had taken any stands on any players. I was quite willing to pressure any of them. (Unless you want to count "Oh and I want to give fuzzy a hug, which means he's town." a stand.)