Page 25 of 29

Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 4:24 am
by The Central Scrutinizer
unvote


Okay, that probably means there's still mafia left. I need to re-run the logic for no-lynch, especially since the only person that I think could possibly be mafia is advocating it.

Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 4:27 am
by Simenon
If you don't advocate it, you're going to be lynched for beings scum regardless, so you might as well vote no lynch and hope for the better.

Also, your previous attempt to discredit the idea of there being mafia was quite convenient for you considering it would buy you a possible win of an otherwise unwinnable TCS-Shanba-Unnkillable Ecto

Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 4:29 am
by Simenon
Simenon wrote:If you don't advocate it, you're going to be lynched for beings scum regardless, so you might as well vote no lynch and hope for the better.
The logic behind that is hopefully Shanba will realize that the best play for the town is no lynch, and not advocating it is scummy.

But even that doesn't matter, because Shanba and I can force a no lynch.

Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 4:32 am
by The Central Scrutinizer
Yeah, I remember. Not lynching is the only way for the town to win if there's mafia and ecto is an SK, which I still believe to be the case. Sigh. I just fucking hate no-lynching in endgame. It's like giving up.

I hope you make the right choice, ecto.

vote: no-lynch

Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:48 am
by Ectomancer
Ok, emotional appeal here, but Im taking a pounding in my life right now and my frontal lobes are jellied.
I'm a Vig, not an SK.
Shanba and Simenon, would you each lay out your opinion of what my move should be tonight if you were me? I would appreciate it.

Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 6:29 am
by Shanba
Whether vig or Sk atm, it doesn't really matter. Your goals are still the same at this stage: vig mafia. So I'm not really too fussed trying to work that out atm. Although that being said, I do believe you to be a vig.

I would definitely recommend targeting Sim tonight. If TCS is scum, he has me completely snowed.

Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:53 am
by Simenon
Obviously kill TCS, which is what I have advocated for various points.

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 8:54 am
by Primate
Ok. Deadline holds, you have -1 and a bit days. Reminding you it's half lynch numbers in deadlines.

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 9:00 am
by Ectomancer
Ok I'm ready.

vote: no lynch

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 10:33 am
by Primate
So that'll be night 6 then.

Get those choices of yours in.

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 12:55 am
by Primate
Image

Today on Brasseye, we investigate the increasing terrification involved in the new trend of 'Gun Gut'. Criminals, faced with increasing police vigilance, have started to hide guns
inside their own bodies
. We tracked down one of these delinquents for an exclusive interview.
gun stomach wrote:I'm dyiiiiiiinnnnnnng
This man has four kids. shitbombed out of his own skull in order to stop the pain of the uzi sown to his stomach lining.
Ted Maul wrote:Makes me sick, Chris
yes. yes. yes.

Ectomancer,
Gun Stomach, vigilante
, Garotted and Fell down an elevator shaft. Night 6.

Day 7.

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:07 am
by The Central Scrutinizer
So... what the fuck?

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:08 am
by Simenon
Three options, really:
1. Ecto didn't have the ability to kill.
2. Ecto shot Shanba.
3. One of us has kill immunity, and for some reason Ecto didn't state who he was shooting :/

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:22 am
by Simenon
I hate you pod. So so much.

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 6:11 am
by Shanba
Geh.
Sim, option 1 is probably wrong, given noone else claimed the kills and it says vigilante by his name in the death scene.

Also, you left out the option that Ecto chose to no-kill for some reason (if he did, it was probably because he believed I was scum.)

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 6:16 am
by The Central Scrutinizer
I think ecto no-killed, although that's just my theory. There was no upside to shooting Shanba again, and two unnightkillables in a game would be super imba. He must have just no-killed because he didn't want to be responsible for winning or losing the game.

My opinions on this are pretty clear, though. I'm almost 100% convinced at this point that Shanba is pro-town. Just to be sure though, I'm going to reread both of you before I cast a vote.

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 6:17 am
by The Central Scrutinizer
Oh, and I'm not unnightkillable, just for the record.

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:50 am
by Simenon
Shanba wrote:Geh.
Sim, option 1 is probably wrong, given noone else claimed the kills and it says vigilante by his name in the death scene.
I mean Ecto lost the ability to kill for some reason.
Also, you left out the option that Ecto chose to no-kill for some reason (if he did, it was probably because he believed I was scum.)
Doubtful.

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 11:10 am
by The Central Scrutinizer
How could ecto lose the ability to NK?

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 11:38 am
by Simenon
Through something the town doesn't know yet.

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 7:38 am
by The Central Scrutinizer
Like?

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 7:51 am
by Simenon
Something in his role. Perhaps it said "you can only shoot twice." or "if you target x, you can't shoot no more" or something along those lines. And he wouldn't claim it because he didn't want to alarm the scum.

Unlikely, but certainly possible in a Podmod.

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 3:59 pm
by The Central Scrutinizer
Wouldn't it be to his benefit to claim something like that?

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 4:07 pm
by Simenon
It would also have been to his benefit to shoot.

/shrug

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:52 am
by Primate
bumpah