Mafiascum.net

To find out if they're town or not.

If I don't have a 100% read, I try to improve. What the fuck is your problem?

↑ BlueBloodedToffee wrote:

↑ Wisdom wrote:
so you dont know then?

I can't KNOW. But, he's probably town.

and what makes you think that?

@Tier - My problem is the inconsistency in your reads.

@Wisdom - Because he is.

↑ Not_Mafia wrote:Will go back to Micc if necessary

do so

↑ Not_Mafia wrote:Will go back to Micc if necessary

do so

↑ BlueBloodedToffee wrote:

@Wisdom - Because he is.

point to something that points to micc being town then

It is not inconsistent. I currently think you might be scum. However, I would be perfectly willing to try to work with you.

If I were a shitty player, I'd just scream at you now for being stupid and possibly scum. I know that doesn't solve anything, however.

post 591, BlueBloodedToffee"]I can't KNOW.[/quote]

↑ BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Why would you want to work with someone you're scum-reading?

We still have 21 hours to lynch this

I'll pass Wisdom.

Yeah, it is. You can't speak to someone like you're town-reading them and then say they might be scum in the very same paragraph.

This feels like scum caught for the wrong reasons.

then ill take it as an empty claim that you cant justify

You do that.

well, if I were actually inconsistent as scum I would be scum caught for the right reasons, not the wrong ones!
If it helps, I can dig up old posts like that from town games.

BBT, I cannot see why you think micc is town. Why won't you elaborate?

Nah, meta means shit.

You were inconsistent. But if you genuinely feel that you haven't been then you would be scum caught for the wrong reasons.

No, BBT. We are having a disagreement on if something is an inconsistency or not. I say it's not, you say it is.
By calling me scum for it, you show that only scum-me would do this something.
If I show you town-me doing it, I essentially disprove your point.

How would that not be useful?

76 - In this post, you talk to Esp like you know he is town.

332 - In this post, it feels like you're flinging mud at the KBW wagon to see what sticks. Like, look at all these people just voting KBW, but I won't push it, I'll just highlight it and see if someone else will do it for me.

364 - Then comes your awful vote for LMS.

So, yeah. Those points, plus your cog dis when talking to Micc, makes me think you're scum.

PEdit - Because it's meta. You're hardly going to go digging and show Scum!Tier doing the same things are you? Meta is too subjective and is bullshit. I'm not interested.

There's no way BBT is seriously pushing this nonsense as town.

Look, what you call an inconsistency is my regular town play. Why don't you believe me? Why do you scumread me for it?

As a rebuttal:
76: No, why do you think so?
332: I was AGAINST the KBW wagon; if I wanted others to push the kbw wagon, why would I not just shut my mouth?
364: have you already taken a look at his iso? Please tell me what you think of it!

You can explain your micc towread now, thanks.

I'm not voting micc. He's a scumread, but not nearly as much as my other ones.
Preferred lynch is between MS or BBT. I think I might prefer BBT, actually.
VOTE: bbt

Wisdom, come join us.

Look at this shit.

1. The wording of it. Why would you advise scum how to find your flavour?
2. No, you wasn't against the KBW wagon. In fact, if you was, then why didn't you pursue any of the votes on the wagon? Secondly, if you were against it, why did you say this;

↑ TierShift wrote:

↑ Bert wrote:KBW has been null unless you think his "playing around rather than getting serious" is scummy (which i don't this early in the game)

My thoughts.

3. I've read the game. You're my top scum-read. I'd very much like to get you lynched.

Your inability to explain your micc read makes me think you're incompetent!

Inability or refusal?

Your refusal to explain your micc read makes me think you're incompetent!