Mafiascum.net

In post 599, DeathByWobbuffet wrote:

In post 597, TwoFace wrote:

In post 594, DeathByWobbuffet wrote:So TwoFace scumreads me for... what reason exactly? Because my slot got into an argument with him over the definition of a role?

Nope try again.

So what is your reasoning? Care to explain? Or don't you feel like answering that?

Already have Not going to do it again. Lazy scum is lazy.

You have problems bro.

Like I said before, I believe that it's blatantly obvious that ThinkBig was inactive at that time and will ignore you if you ask again, because I don't need to answer to a VI.

Wobbuffet just asked you to explain your reasoning on why you scumread him. That's a pretty simple question, we shouldn't have to ask you again and again.

Well I wasn't here at the time and I don't particularly feel like digging through 25 pages to find some vague reasoning from you as to why you think I'm scum. You could at least give me the post number?

In post 601, Human Sequencer wrote:You have problems bro.

Like I said before, I believe that it's blatantly obvious that ThinkBig was inactive at that time and will ignore you if you ask again, because I don't need to answer to a VI.

Wobbuffet just asked you to explain your reasoning on why you scumread him. That's a pretty simple question, we shouldn't have to ask you again and again.

He made 14 posts just hours before copper made that accusation. 19 posts total and the game hadn't even been open 2 full days. How is that inactive?
And did you really just fucking call me a VI?

Let me get through day 2 and then I'm replacing out of this game. Now I have to decide you or copper.

It seems to me as if your scumreads are primarily centered around who calls you a VI more often.
Can you confirm or deny this?

I would really rather keep the replacements to a minimum.
Please would you stick it out for the rest of us?

In post 605, Human Sequencer wrote:It seems to me as if your scumreads are primarily centered around who calls you a VI more often.
Can you confirm or deny this?

No because I was scum reading both of you before either called me a VI. Way to misrep

In post 606, Human Sequencer wrote:I would really rather keep the replacements to a minimum.
Please would you stick it out for the rest of us?

Lynch you today and I won't replace out

The game isn't a personal playground for you. We're all trying to enjoy ourselves and play the game-- Making that claim damages the sanctity of that.
It's not about bailing if you don't get your way. It's about convincing others to believe you with charisma and finesse.

Would you please reconsider your viewpoint?

Didn't say it's a personal playground. I'm trying to lynch my top 2 scum reads. People who did in my eyes legitimately scummy things. I'd prefer lynching one today to make the game easier for the rest of town.

I understand that. I think that's reasonable, to try and have your top two scumreads lynched.

However I don't think it's fair to replace out if neither I or Wobbuffet are lynched. Wouldn't you agree?

You don't really want to ask me what I think is fair because what I think is fair would just make the game more unbearable. So just stop talking to me.

VOTE: TwoFace

I'm all in for a policy lynch. Who knows, he might be even scum.

I would usually agree with a policy lynch, the exception is that I'm pretty convinced that TwoFace is town.

TB and Misa both have a much higher chance of flipping red for me, and in the case of Misa recontextualizes a lot more of the game based on her interactions with others.

Sorry HS, It matters not anymore.
The dude just can't keep matters inside them game, can't take criticism, can't calm down, and the only thing he provides here is antagonism is such a way that I no longer want to play.

One replacing out because of a player is too much. It's time to take out the garbage.
And hey TwoFace? Yes. You're a VI. it's the perfect description of your play.

VOTE: TwoFace

I can get behind this policy lynch.

In post 593, Human Sequencer wrote:I caught this on a reread, forgot to ask earlier
What's 'Vert-slim'?
Also, thanks for the tea.

I dunno... can you link me to the post or quote it. I'll need to look at the context. As it is likely that I used one word instead of another here.

Never ascribe malice to what can adequately be described with ineptitude.

@Naomi

In post 433, Naomi-Tan wrote: Human Sequencer - Also think they are green. they are pretty much like Vert-slim.

Policy lynch me for trying to lynch my scum reads? Fine go ahead but at least wait til Day 2

VOTE: TwoFace

As much as I TR TwoFace, I feel like a policy lynch is necessary here. He's already shown that he's unwilling to contribute thoughtfully to the game, so I think that lynching them won't hurt too much even if they do flip town. And yeah, maybe it'll turn out that they're actually mafia.

In post 621, DeathByWobbuffet wrote:VOTE: TwoFace

As much as I TR TwoFace, I feel like a policy lynch is necessary here. He's already shown that he's unwilling to contribute thoughtfully to the game, so I think that lynching them won't hurt too much even if they do flip town. And yeah, maybe it'll turn out that they're actually mafia.

I've contributed thoughtfully. Thanks.

Wobbuffet, how do you strongly townread TwoFace if you don't understand why he's scumreading you?

I know I didn't join this wagon yet but its becoming clear to me that we will be unable to progress to red hunting while TF contuines to distract town with his play. I don't like wagoning green players but if he continues to take 99% of greens focus then I don't feel that I have much choice as the distraction is too great.

VOTE: Two Facce