Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2017 11:45 am
This is also such a scummy post/concept? Why do you think the real Cop should out just for your own amusement? Someone claimed Cop and became the Mafia NK target. I'd say that is GOOD COVER for the real Cop. They are guaranteed to survive at least one night. Whenever Comm flips then you'll know if he is/isn't the Cop, and hence if/when the real Cop claims that has nothing to do with Comm fake claiming (if he is fake claiming).In post 557, Tenshii wrote:Comm is uncc'd. Please shut up and talk about something else.
If Comm isn't cop then real cop should CC now. I'm not going to deal with analyzing your late game claim because you failed at doing a shitty roleswap.
Balki, please don't test my patience. If the Cop can only catch Mafia, how does he give "Town clears"? If a Cop checks a Werewolf he will get "Not Mafia" which is the same as him checking a VT, the Vig, or even the Mafia GodFather themselves!!In post 569, Balki B wrote:Wolves won't necessarily protect Cop. Cop is possibly good for them cause he finds Mafia, but bad for them in that he gives town a clear.
Because Cop himself is a Town Clear. Stop assuming I can't read. I know the rules.In post 604, Almost50 wrote:Balki, please don't test my patience. If the Cop can only catch Mafia, how does he give "Town clears"? If a Cop checks a Werewolf he will get "Not Mafia" which is the same as him checking a VT, the Vig, or even the Mafia GodFather themselves!!
For THIS SETUP, Conf!Town is not AT ALL a god thing. They're a PRIME NK TARGET for at least one scum group, and there is NO TOWN DOCTOR, so treat them as confirmed if you will, but they will flip sooner than later still.In post 575, MarioManiac4 wrote:MM4's conclusive case on why Cop should CC
Town for scum is a good trade. End. Of.
It doesn't matter if you think you're a gr9 player and everyone should sheep you, or if you think that your 50% clears and 50% chance of detecting scum are so valuable that you simply cannot sacrifice yourself. If cop claims here, we get a HUGE advantage. It allows scum to die BEFORE we get our chance to (probably) lynch multiple times d2. In fact we could slaughter a scumteam before d2's dawn. If cop doesn't claim here, scum WILL be treated as conftown, we will probably go and lynch town today, and when you attempt to CC later you will get lynched.
pedit: Actually I wasn't really joking at all
it wasn't really a fake cc it was him saying that he doesn't believe youIn post 394, CommKnight wrote:With Siblings fake CC I'm comfortable with my vote on the hydra.
you really think scum would be that fucking idiotic as to call you out on your claim if you really were a cop??In post 403, CommKnight wrote:It's a FAKE counter claim. Like you outed yourself as scum because if you're doing this as town, it's against the rules to gamethrow soo blantantly.
oh okay now he kinda says he's a copIn post 408, Siblings Pet Doggo wrote:A. This is misrepresentation, because it's also mostly your play.In post 407, CommKnight wrote:Let's see:
- You build a case on me from "Meta"
- Don't like my "reactions"
- Force me to L2/L1 intention to a full claim
- Immediately CC.
How convenient that you are "Cop" after all that and *I* claim it as well eh? That speaks for itself. I claimed first.
B. Yeah, you're passive when you go all out and aggressive. You're not doing that.
C. How is this scummy?
D. Yeah, becausethat's my role
CommKnight is not a cop.
I am.
Now kill him.
-Ali
so pretty much anybody who voted you is scum?In post 414, CommKnight wrote:Balki B, EchoVision, MarioManiac4, GameNBurger, Flubbernugget
^ Vig, if you can shoot in this pool that'd be awesome.
don't really see a reason for this other than OMGUSIn post 416, CommKnight wrote:^ I even suggest shooting Balki, that would probably be a scum flip from the 5.In post 415, Balki B wrote:Nah, CommKnight is scum.
can i ask why the suspicion on us three and not any others on the wagon?In post 420, Almost50 wrote:{MarioManiac4, GameNBurger, EchoVision} Pick one.
Actually, I retract the TR on flubber too. Might as well switch him with Siblings. That's the last 4 votes on you, and flubber now the scummiest of them all.
VOTE: flubber
if you were town, why would ali cc? the other team would shoot him for ccing a town player whichIn post 422, CommKnight wrote:Also consider this... if I were scum, why would Ali CC? The other scum team would have to SHOOT me with no CC's.
So there's no benefit for town!Ali to CC me as they just get themselves killed in a crossfire.
Just saying.
In post 428, CommKnight wrote:(I'm joking, no personal attacks, I know you're scum too).In post 423, Balki B wrote:You are so scum. You did not think through this one before you posted it.In post 419, CommKnight wrote:Plus you're now outed to the OTHER scum faction, so they'll likely pick you off as well.
You mean to ask why I suspected only 50% if the wagon, except I also suspected one third of the other 50%??In post 615, EchoVision wrote:can i ask why the suspicion on us three and not any others on the wagon?In post 420, Almost50 wrote:{MarioManiac4, GameNBurger, EchoVision} Pick one.
Actually, I retract the TR on flubber too. Might as well switch him with Siblings. That's the last 4 votes on you, and flubber now the scummiest of them all.
VOTE: flubber
aside from flubber of course
so is game mafia with Ali or is he WW with BalkiIn post 434, CommKnight wrote:Scum is so painfully obvious right now.
VOTE: Game Let's lynch one and then Balki and WWs will probably off Ali for us.
hi i'm echoIn post 477, CommKnight wrote: We also now have to sort Echo, Mario and Flubber. 2/3 more likely than not being scum.
what do you think is scummy about sesq avoiding the leading wagon? wouldn't scum want to be on the wagon in attempts for a mislynch??In post 482, Siblings Pet Doggo wrote:I feel like the way sesq avoided the wagon is scummy.
But yeah tbh, I wasn't really thinking about the setup.
-Ali
pedit: I fakeclaimed because I thought you were scum fakeclaiming near a noose.
if you scumread me for "wagoning onto comm" then how about the other four people who hopped onto that wagon? are they scumread too? I don't think that any of them gave reasons above mine, being that Ali's case seemed pretty decent and convincingIn post 497, Sesq wrote:tbh i havent been paying much attention, will iso now
after reading through it i dont really see anything except sorta what seems like wagoning onto comm