I also think you would have come up with that argument at the time if that was really how you intended it.
This latest batch of BS is enough for me to
I feel what I said in that post was quite clear. I think everyone understood it except yourself, appearantly. You somehow read that as me clearing farside.I don't believe you're being honest in your attempt to change the weight of your words. It is plain to anyone who reads that what you were trying to accomplish; trying to squirm through the loopholes in the specific wording of the post isn't really a very convincing argument.
I also think you would have come up with that argument at the time if that was really how you intended it.
No.Brutal Assassin wrote:I feel what I said in that post was quite clear. I think everyone understood it except yourself, appearantly. You somehow read that as me clearing farside.
Explain, please, how I am squirming through loopholes. You're routinely, throughout this whole game, tried to paint things in a false light. It was the reason I first started suspecting you and the reason that you continually garner my attention.
It also amuses me that it copied as Rolling Eyes. But seriously, I don't think you're scum because of quag's behavior toward you, but I do think you're wrong, and you're using crappy arguments to make your case.cyberbob wrote: Anyone who sees this as a scumtell has no business playing mafia in my book. I ninja'd you. It happens. Rolling Eyes
Just noting it for others to look at it however they will.Cyberbob wrote:Interesting? I would class it more as either very dumb (if he's town) or very clever (if he's scum).Brutal Assassin wrote:Interesting that you group both of you together here.Y'know, bob, posting simultaneously isn't making us look any better.
Hah. Sure.Brutal Assassin wrote:Just noting it for others to look at it however they will.Cyberbob wrote:Interesting? I would class it more as either very dumb (if he's town) or very clever (if he's scum).Brutal Assassin wrote:Interesting that you group both of you together here.Y'know, bob, posting simultaneously isn't making us look any better.
I hardly call one post that I made today against you a hard push. I said I noticed you following TSPN. I was talking more with TSPN today then anything. Yesterday lynch I had comments about you and TSPN as my suspects. I've FOS TSPN today so show if you think I've pushed for you lynched.Cyberbob wrote:Against farside, I have that extremely poor hammer as well as her rather hard push against me - a townie - today, when our votes must be chosen with even greater care due to the possibility of LyLo tomorrow in the case of a mislynch (which I would be).Flameaxe wrote:Bob, would you mind restating what you have against the two? That'd be swell.
Against BA, I have his attempt to clear farside with some of the scummiest logic I've ever seen as well a simply scummy demeanour in general.
I think he means flavor-wise.Brutal Assassin wrote:You think Quag was doctor and cop?TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:And no one's claimed a doctor, so it must have been someone else. Quag would make sense, I suppose. Oh well.flameaxe wrote: My result on day one was one.