Page 25 of 27
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:21 pm
by Cyberbob
I don't believe you're being honest in your attempt to change the weight of your words. It is plain to anyone who reads that what you were trying to accomplish; trying to squirm through the loopholes in the specific wording of the post isn't really a very convincing argument.
I also think you would have come up with that argument at the time if that was really how you intended it.
This latest batch of BS is enough for me to
Vote: Brutal Assassin
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:21 pm
by TheSweatpantsNinja
Except, y'know, you're wrong. The only reason I'm not still going after you is I think quagmire implied you were innocent. And I don't know, stating a scenario in which you set up your last two lynches and none of them involve farside sure seems like an attempt to clear her to me.
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:22 pm
by TheSweatpantsNinja
Y'know, bob, posting simultaneously isn't making us look any better.
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:23 pm
by Cyberbob
TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:Y'know, bob, posting simultaneously isn't making us look any better.
Anyone who sees this as a scumtell has no business playing mafia in my book. I ninja'd you. It happens.
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:27 pm
by Brutal Assassin
I don't believe you're being honest in your attempt to change the weight of your words. It is plain to anyone who reads that what you were trying to accomplish; trying to squirm through the loopholes in the specific wording of the post isn't really a very convincing argument.
I also think you would have come up with that argument at the time if that was really how you intended it.
I feel what I said in that post was quite clear. I think everyone understood it except yourself, appearantly. You somehow read that as me clearing farside.
Explain, please, how I am squirming through loopholes. You're routinely, throughout this whole game, tried to paint things in a false light. It was the reason I first started suspecting you and the reason that you continually garner my attention.
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:28 pm
by Brutal Assassin
Y'know, bob, posting simultaneously isn't making us look any better.
Interesting that you group both of you together here.
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:30 pm
by Cyberbob
Brutal Assassin wrote:Y'know, bob, posting simultaneously isn't making us look any better.
Interesting that you group both of you together here.
Interesting? I would class it more as either very dumb (if he's town) or very clever (if he's scum).
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:30 pm
by Cyberbob
Brutal Assassin wrote:I feel what I said in that post was quite clear. I think everyone understood it except yourself, appearantly. You somehow read that as me clearing farside.
Explain, please, how I am squirming through loopholes. You're routinely, throughout this whole game, tried to paint things in a false light. It was the reason I first started suspecting you and the reason that you continually garner my attention.
No.
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:31 pm
by TheSweatpantsNinja
Yeah. I was being facetious. For'serious.
cyberbob wrote: Anyone who sees this as a scumtell has no business playing mafia in my book. I ninja'd you. It happens. Rolling Eyes
It also amuses me that it copied as Rolling Eyes. But seriously, I don't think you're scum because of quag's behavior toward you, but I do think you're wrong, and you're using crappy arguments to make your case.
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:31 pm
by Brutal Assassin
Cyberbob wrote:Brutal Assassin wrote:Y'know, bob, posting simultaneously isn't making us look any better.
Interesting that you group both of you together here.
Interesting? I would class it more as either very dumb (if he's town) or very clever (if he's scum).
Just noting it for others to look at it however they will.
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:32 pm
by Cyberbob
Brutal Assassin wrote:Cyberbob wrote:Brutal Assassin wrote:Y'know, bob, posting simultaneously isn't making us look any better.
Interesting that you group both of you together here.
Interesting? I would class it more as either very dumb (if he's town) or very clever (if he's scum).
Just noting it for others to look at it however they will.
Hah. Sure.
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:32 pm
by TheSweatpantsNinja
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:32 pm
by Flameaxe
Wow, I take a break and you guys start the party without me?
I'm sad now.
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:34 pm
by Brutal Assassin
Flameaxe wrote:Wow, I take a break and you guys start the party without me?
I'm sad now.
No use twiddling our thumbs. This is supposed to be a speed game, remember?
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:36 pm
by Brutal Assassin
Anyways, bed time, need to get up in 4 and a half hours. Later.
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:41 pm
by TheSweatpantsNinja
So, before I go to bed, since we've all claimed, how many doctors are left in the game, flameaxe?
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:46 pm
by Flameaxe
My result on day one was one.
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 5:00 am
by farside22
Cyberbob wrote:Flameaxe wrote:Bob, would you mind restating what you have against the two? That'd be swell.
Against farside, I have that extremely poor hammer as well as her rather hard push against me - a townie - today, when our votes must be chosen with even greater care due to the possibility of LyLo tomorrow in the case of a mislynch (which I would be).
Against BA, I have his attempt to
clear farside with some of the scummiest logic I've ever seen as well a simply scummy demeanour in general.
I hardly call one post that I made today against you a hard push. I said I noticed you following TSPN. I was talking more with TSPN today then anything. Yesterday lynch I had comments about you and TSPN as my suspects. I've FOS TSPN today so show if you think I've pushed for you lynched.
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:14 am
by TheSweatpantsNinja
flameaxe wrote: My result on day one was one.
And no one's claimed a doctor, so it must have been someone else. Quag would make sense, I suppose. Oh well.
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:25 am
by Flameaxe
TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:flameaxe wrote: My result on day one was one.
And no one's claimed a doctor, so it must have been someone else. Quag would make sense, I suppose. Oh well.
We also have two unconfirmed.
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 11:32 am
by Brutal Assassin
TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:flameaxe wrote: My result on day one was one.
And no one's claimed a doctor, so it must have been someone else. Quag would make sense, I suppose. Oh well.
You think Quag was doctor and cop?
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 12:27 pm
by Flameaxe
Brutal Assassin wrote:TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:flameaxe wrote: My result on day one was one.
And no one's claimed a doctor, so it must have been someone else. Quag would make sense, I suppose. Oh well.
You think Quag was doctor and cop?
I think he means flavor-wise.
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 12:40 pm
by farside22
Simenon wrote:Vote Count
Brutal Assassin (1)- Flameaxe
I thought cyberbob voted against BA and BA voted against cyberbob at this point. I don't believe Flameaxe, myself or TSPN have voted.
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:46 pm
by Flameaxe
I have indeed not voted.
Also, I took another look at my role pm, and it is indeed doctor as in flavor.
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:48 pm
by TheSweatpantsNinja
flameaxe wrote: I think he means flavor-wise.
That is correct. Also, no I hadn't voted in case of quicklynch, but at two days until deadline, and with nothing convincing to change my mind, I will
Vote farside.