Mafiascum.net

Ruby Red, Azurit, LuckyOtter, Performer
Dunnstral, the worst, Tchill13
MariaR, profii
Morality
SIV36
Kokichi Oma

UnaBombaH

[/area]

In post 560, the worst wrote:ooh what makes you say Maria in particular? I'm pretty keen to.

Yeah Azurit stuck out to me as well.

This is what I was referencing, TW. Granted I'd like to know what Morality was referencing as well, but there was something about your wording that felt off to me. I'm not super worried about it right now, so this is a pin for D2.


Dunn, why do you say performer is scum? You've not given him any attention before. Is it just his vote or anything else?

Why did you ask me rather than Morality though? If you have serious questions about my alignment perhaps we can have a better conversation than me elaborating on a read I have no interest in elaborating on? :0

Dunn:
ruby / worst / tchil / koki / azurit / Lucky Otter / Performer

profii (5):
Kokichi Oma, the worst, UnaBombaH, Tchill13, SIV36

koki:
maria / profii / performer / SIV / TChill


so those wagons happened, then SIV points out that Koki will hammer so Dunn better claim (VT) then Dunn/worst/chill move to Performer.


Question to Tchill/TW - if it's a VT claim why do you believe the VT claim?
Also - do you think the Dunn is trying to encourage your apparent willingness to run up any given wagon for survival? I'm more convinced about Dunn than Perf following this turnaround flipping scum.

I guess I assumed Morality was going to elaborate anyway? It feels like he's still in catch-up mode. His statement didn't ping me, but yours did, and I've been reading you as town, so I wanted to see if I could make anything out of your response for future reference. It's not immediately useful, so I won't press it.

On that note, I'd rather hear why you think Performer is a better call than Dunn, but I want to hear from Dunn first.

Because his vote is opportunistic and bad and poiting to something he said 300 posts ago where he voted kokichi instead is bad too

profii I'm not 100% sure what you're saying but we need a lynch for the shiny shiny information
Performer is most likely to flip red here imo, I don't think I've been shy about that

@LO I have no interest in elaborating on that read and like subzero interest in elaborating before Morality catches up, hope you understand

I'm cool with this.

VOTE: Performer

Tbh I'm OK with giving dunn a chance on day 2 more so than I am with giving performer a chance on day 2. Pretty just because I've seen dunn play before and honestly his endgame was good as town. Got better as he went.

Please let us just lynch somebody.

Performer has definitely been scummy. Off of actions alone I'm pushing kokichi or performer and honestly performer would be my preference. His wording is very methodical imo. So that guy feeling plus other things that have already been mentioned makes me completely fine lynching performer. If not performer then anyone is fine. I think this is a fine lynch to actually push through though. If dunn is in fact scum we can figure that out later. I doubt profii of all people is gonna be the one to derail this performer wagon seeing how he's scummy enough as it is.

Gut feeling

Dunn becomes hella obv town when he’s town.

VOTE: Performer

Good wagons

Why I'm voting: I can see what makes performer scummy. He's got a high quantity of low quality reads. It doesn't add up that he's putting that much energy into the game yet getting things wrong. I was chalking it up to him not reading the game in-depth. I'm also voting him because I'm afraid we may have ran out of options which we'd all agree on for a lynch.

Yet, currently I don't see many scum-team possibilities that include performer being teamed with other members. However, I'm rethinking that as I go through the whole game again. I might have a different outlook on that after.

I'm back from newyork catch up in the am

We flip scum d1 and their partners d2. Calm your farm SIV<3

Pedit welcome back Maria!!

Hmm. Are we being driven by scum, or a trigger happy town? Mix of both?

Someone vote and I'll quick hammer

In post 616, the worst wrote:Calm your farm SIV<3

In post 617, Morality wrote:Hmm. Are we being driven by scum, or a trigger happy town? Mix of both?

This is exactly what I’m trying to work out.

I’ve never been through 4 wagons on day 1 so IDK what’s going on

Also - having been one of the wagons and it formed for apparently no given reason I am wondering where scum are involved as 1. I know I’m town. 2. I suppose 1 is actually irrelevant - I didn’t think, I did anything scummy to deserve a wagon

It really bothers me that tchil is still saying I’m scummy but can’t give me a reason

In post 614, SIV36 wrote:Why I'm voting: I can see what makes performer scummy. He's got a high quantity of low quality reads. It doesn't add up that he's putting that much energy into the game yet getting things wrong. I was chalking it up to him not reading the game in-depth. I'm also voting him because I'm afraid we may have ran out of options which we'd all agree on for a lynch.

Yet, currently I don't see many scum-team possibilities that include performer being teamed with other members. However, I'm rethinking that as I go through the whole game again. I might have a different outlook on that after.

However - looking at the Performer ISO, this is post contains reasoning I can sheep to get day 1 done

Usually I would say intent to vote here to give Perormer a chance to claim prior to hammer but I’m very tempted to vote given that whilst we have only 1 claim so far (luckily a VT we are on wagon 4 and it’s just some miracle half our PRs aren’t outed yet)

Meh usually snap decision I make myself go wrong some how so I’ll do the safer play

Intent to vote - claim

VOTE: Performer


hmmmm

So profii felt the need to get on the wagon only once SIV unvoted...duly noted.