Mafiascum.net

In post 598, JarJarDrinks wrote:

In post 597, Andriod18 wrote:(Not to mention the post above isn't even towny in fact it's quite bad.)

We're not even sure which post Lovebird's referring to, mine or Charles's.

Which one are u saying is bad?

In post 562, Vaxkiller wrote:It feels like you voted your scum buddy for some distancing then it backfired, now hes yelling at you in scumchat.

In post 538, Vaxkiller wrote:

In post 537, ArcAngel9 wrote:

Prod received

Whats going on? I have been a bit unwell. Please allow me to catch up!

Vote jar jar and get a day 1 town read. Day 2 you start from scratch. This is all I can offer u

In post 541, texcat wrote:

In post 528, Scioness Sajj wrote:

texcat

- you have asked a lot of questions - do you have any conclusions? or just reads.

My strongest scum reads are Osuka and ArcAngel9. I'm still waiting for ArcAngel9 to come back and explain 235. I definitely need to see more from her.
I am suspicious of Edos (because I thought A50's reasons had some merit), ETL (who explained his metoo post, but I'd like to see more), Lovebird (who jumped on the Edos bandwagon, but claimed it wasn't a sheep and claimed she had her own reasons, but didn't bother to tell us what they were).

In post 605, Golden Robster wrote:

Town

:

Leaning Town

: A50, KK
------- (town block)

Semi-leaning Town

: Osuka, Pine

Kind of town

: Hopkirk, Dunnstral, Creature, Scioness

Neutral/Undecided

: Lalendra (N), Ausuka (UD), JJD (UD), Android (N)

Meh

: Texcat, Lovebird, Performer

Leaning Scum

: Vaxkiller

Scum

:

Potential lynches:

Vax > Tex > Performer > Lovebird

In post 535, JarJarDrinks wrote:

JarJarDrinks(4) ~ Golden Robster, Myloninja13, Osuka, Vaxkiller

Robster is town. Mafia logic says one or more of these other numbnuts are scum.

In post 606, WhemeStar wrote:You missed me

In post 603, WhemeStar wrote:After work I want someone to talk to me about this

In post 529, Kublai Khan wrote:

In post 391, Scioness Sajj wrote:do you always interrupt engagements or is it a special case?

What were you engaged in?

In post 604, ArcAngel9 wrote:

In post 541, texcat wrote:

In post 528, Scioness Sajj wrote:

texcat

- you have asked a lot of questions - do you have any conclusions? or just reads.

My strongest scum reads are Osuka and ArcAngel9. I'm still waiting for ArcAngel9 to come back and explain 235. I definitely need to see more from her.
I am suspicious of Edos (because I thought A50's reasons had some merit), ETL (who explained his metoo post, but I'd like to see more), Lovebird (who jumped on the Edos bandwagon, but claimed it wasn't a sheep and claimed she had her own reasons, but didn't bother to tell us what they were).

I hardly said anything in the game? How am I your strongest scum read? looks like a convenient read.

VOTE: textcat

In post 530, Ausuka wrote:

In post 522, Scioness Sajj wrote:

In post 434, Ausuka wrote:i gave reasoning for why i believed there was a traitor and it would've made sense if almost was it. iirc people agreed with me at the time. sure it could potentially be seen as a traitor signal but there's also blatant town reasoning for doing that i've already mentioned which is being totally ignored in favour of a scum narrative

didn't you scumread those people for agreeing with you?
you don't believe your theory is plausible anymore?

no?

and I think it's possible but that doesn't mean I'm going to lynch on that possibility.

In post 612, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:hopkirk has too many townreads.

In post 615, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 612, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:hopkirk has too many townreads.

What is too many townreads? Why is this an issue?

In post 35, Srceenplay wrote:

Spoiler:

Here's the first truth about second chances: They rarely happen by chance. Oh, the first one, sure, is often concentrated pure luck, but first chances are notorious for fizzling out, derailing. At which point, everyone learns the second truth: Pure luck will only take you so far.

Recently, in talking to a number of people who've had remarkable second acts, I met a woman named Anne Martindell whose first chance, true to form, hadn't lasted a year. On the surface, what she got was an opportunity to go to college, but condensed down, it was really a shot at becoming who she was. It stretched out, one long dazzling promise, for two semesters at Smith, during which she became sharply aware of how you could be ravenous for something like European history, how the sight of a Picasso could hit you like you'd been socked, how ideas—ideas alone—could break you out of shyness.

Right after, she learned how it was possible for a chance to be exploded so fast you couldn't be sure you'd had it. Come June, her father yanked her out of school. This was 1932. The place was too "bluestocking," he complained—too intellectual, and if you want to ruin your possibilities for marriage, that's what you'll become. She'd felt fully alive. Now she felt devastated, "terribly upset and terribly bored and terribly angry"; a year later, she was married to "my father's dream man." He was basically sweet, she says measuredly, but they had nothing in common.

If this were a fable, and perhaps it qualifies, this would be the place to point out several additional truths: Foremost, that all first chances contain seeds for a second, not to mention a third, fourth, and fifth. Without water or soil, they can lie dormant forever. Those seeds are durable, though. They can bloom years later. Not long ago The New York Times carried a record of a second flowering after a 70-year delay, in a story headlined THE GRADUATE, AGE 87, LOOKS AHEAD.

"I think women can have it all," Martindell told the reporter who'd caught up with her after her graduation from Smith, which was attended by her four children and nine grandchildren. "We live so long, you can have the family and then the career.

"I didn't do anything real until I was 50," she added, a bit of an understatement perhaps, given that after an impromptu teaching job at her children's school gave her the courage to test the unknown, she blazed a remarkable career path. Political volunteer work led to convention delegate led to New Jersey state senator. "At budget time I had a hard time," she says: "I'd missed third grade and beginning math (Mother was sick that year and didn't enroll us)." Ultimately, Martindell became director of the Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance. At 65, she was appointed ambassador to New Zealand.

It was there, then twice divorced, that she met the love of her life when she rode her bike to a gallery opening and fell in love with the painter. He wanted to marry her, but she refused. That wasn't necessary nowadays, she said ("he was cross"), but the affair continued over two continents for almost 20 years, till his death. What initially attracted him: her appreciation of art.


Read more: http://www.oprah.com/spirit/second-chan ... z5ISiESf00



Ego

In post 516, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:and also i'm pretty sure i declared v/la so i didn't have time to quote and go into it more than pointing out something i agreed with. that's gonna be the case for much of this first game day. personal shit. i'm not gonna waste time defending my short posts for today. deal with it. ALSO ALSO i find it suspicious that you jumped to his defense. just saying.

In post 13, osuka wrote:/confirm

hardclaim mafia rolecop

In post 14, osuka wrote:

In post 13, osuka wrote:/confirm

hardclaim mafia rolecop

sory

***regular rolecop

In post 33, osuka wrote:VOTE: wavemode

In post 32, Fumuki wrote:/confirm

osuka and ausuka...?

hmmmm, it's confusing but not THAT confusing

if i got a nickel for every time i was called 'asuka' on here, i could probably make a job out of it

In post 80, osuka wrote:Thank you everyone, very cool!

VOTE: wavemode
because last time we played together you were scum and I’m pretty sure you made it to end game