Yeah, I totally forgot about thatIn post 462, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:I'm not done with labrat, and I want to look at his answers that he's meant to be posting
And actually, sorry, I was wrong there. I assumed I answered all of your arguments before, because they seemed really similar to what korina asked me about, but it’s a completely different thing :/ I’ve read it in a weird way
sorry about that
Those are actually kind of fair. I don’t really see stuff that way, but I get why would it be scum-readIn post 398, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:Labrat, well, I'm getting plenty of scum pings there.
I didn't really read so much into his role pm thing, but this posts tone strikes me as oddIts the sort of thing scum posts after they realize they hit submit instead of preview :lol:In post 17, LabRat01 wrote:ugh, I was talking about the town RC if it wasn't obvious
I was re-reading the thread and noticed that my post could be understood as a disgusting joke
that vote was half-serious, it was not pure RvS, so read it as so
and c'mon, someone write sth
it's boring being here alone
Furthermore It sounds an awful lot like scum trying to push a vote as being naiThat's what I meant by pocketing.In post 24, LabRat01 wrote:hi btw, I've read the first 10-ish pages of your first newb game on MS. You played well, I prob wouldn't have been able to catch youIn post 20, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:Hi o/
D1 is hell, right?
VOTE: labrat
He probably only noticed it because he got it in his rolecard :lol:
Lcp aka mr hyde
Then,
This:Doesn't really advamce us anywhere and is basically just fluff. Maybe NAI, but I find scum often get by by posting stuff like this. To be fair only post 31.
Actually, encouraging votes, prob yeah? I didn’t think of it that way, but I most prob wouldn’t have minded more people sharing their opinion on TW cuz nothing else was going on and he was my biggest SR back thenIn post 398, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:Labrat, well, I'm getting plenty of scum pings there.This is LAMIST as h and a not so subtle reminder than tw has a wagon on him, indirectly encouraging votes.In post 127, LabRat01 wrote:friendly reminder that Majority is 5 and duck has 3 votes on him rn
just don't hammer when not even a day has passed since SoD
And I kinda got freaked out when the wagon on my SR progressed so quickly. My reasoning was rather solid (imo), but it wasn’t a very strong argument and it seemed that people (I don’t remember keyser’s reason for voting, but at least I remember Irrelephant doing that) treated it more strongly than it deserved, which kinda freaked me out
Can you comment on my reasons for voting duck?In post 398, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote: Overall I think Labrat is scum and led a wagon on TW
And when he saw it wasn't going anywhere unvotedThis just feels to me like scum dropping a case not going anywhereIn post 347, LabRat01 wrote:UNVOTE:
Meh, Duck’s posts got so much better. I don’t think I agree with them, but I really like their enthusiasm while talking about their TRs
Not overly townie, but I'm ok with it rn
VOTE: labrat
I think I explained it rather well in here
But my first SR is also quoted here, at the top, so you can look at it if you find it more explanatoryIn post 343, LabRat01 wrote:Underhanded, yeeeahIn post 247, the worst wrote:can you rephrase this post because it sounds like you're trying to allocate motive to my posting without wanting to appear too forceful which is filthyyyyIn post 74, LabRat01 wrote:Was the “I wanna try to sort Key as quick as possible” supposed to be an excuse for asking Left to post reads?In post 54, the worst wrote:how do you read Key's entrance to the thread btw? I wanna try and sort him as quickly as possible so I can comfortably resume quoting The Usual Suspects and burninating scum.
No?
but it def feels that way
OR it feels like your question to Lefty was just an excuse to show off your great town motivations.
Which one do you pick?
I don’t like the previous post either (the one I joked about). It’s prob not directly scum motivated, but it feels a really safe and non-personal way of questioning someone.
if you're asking a question please rephrase it as an open question i can actually give a qualitative answer to :) if you're town FYI, I don't take well to leading questions because they're manipulative and kill conversation in favour of agenda-forcing.
But effective
That was not exactly a question. The way you combined the request for reads with the explanation of why you’re doing it felt off and lamist.
And kinda buddyish/pocketish now that I look at it
Can you comment on that?
Basically, it was just sth that pinged me as weird at the beginning of the game, which could be linked to a scum motivation. Not sth very strong, but still a good read to go off imo.
And now that I think of it, I didn’t ever write a read on TW after that.
I did say that I liked his responses, but it’s not like I focused on making it into a read
In post 389, LabRat01 wrote: idk, TW's posts about DrJ's meta-bias pinged townie and I really liked the enthusiasm in some of his posts
That's not the most brilliant read ever, but it's still not sth I'd want to lynch rn
This should prob be the closest to a read that I’ve posted about T till now? (after his comeback)In post 431, LabRat01 wrote:lmao, you're doing the same thing here you accused me of.In post 409, the worst wrote:In post 347, LabRat01 wrote:UNVOTE:
Meh, Duck’s posts got so much better. I don’t think I agree with them, but I really like their enthusiasm while talking about their TRs
Not overly townie, but I'm ok with it rn
And I’m not a fan of volxen’s read on me.
The arguments he uses feel underwhelming compared to how much time was he willing to waste writing it
read prob coming soonwhy did you unvote me here if you don't think I'm town but are blindly sheeping others?
I'm clearly wagonable in this gamestate. Look at the VCs for D1.
Why didn't you vote volxen here? Can you show me which parts of it felt underwhelming, and why you think that's scum indicative?
if you said the answer to your question inside the question, it's making it difficult for me to answer differently.
I unvoted you because I don't think you're the optimal lynch anymore. My previous read on you was rather flimsy and the new one is flimsy as well, but goes in the other direction
Besides, I think there are better people to push rn that I don't even have a flimsy read on
[snipped]
Can you comment on that?
And I agree with the read on creat. That’s not sth I’m confident in reading, but it’s also not a player I’d miss much if he was lynched