Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2019 1:42 pm
I think Dunn's just a lazy old fuck
It's even in the post of yours I quoted lmaooooIn post 595, Shoshin wrote:Dunn's at the top of my suspect list. He's playing exactly like he did in another game where he was scum, making some setup comments, saying nothing about alignments.In post 586, Flubbernugget wrote:Dunn isn't a solid vote. He's not even someone you'd vote apparently
Oh Dont WorryIn post 582, Shoshin wrote:Maybe I'm underestimating Schadd
I don't disagree but having just played with both town & scum Dunn, this feels a lot more like Dunn's scum game so far. As lazy as he is, he had a lot more presence as town than this.In post 600, Zulfy wrote:I think Dunn's just a lazy old fuck
You can analyze posts but have so few conclusionsIn post 597, Zulfy wrote:We're gonna have to critically analyze what you mean by commentary.
ahhh in the short term maybeIn post 587, RadiantCowbells wrote:schadd finds it very easy to be carefree as scum
uzi's just plain old scum.In post 610, schadd_ wrote:how is _uzi_ not a lazy old fuck .. /??? ?
She's saying "solid vote on Dunn", why the "apparently"?In post 602, Flubbernugget wrote:It's even in the post of yours I quoted lmaooooIn post 595, Shoshin wrote:Dunn's at the top of my suspect list. He's playing exactly like he did in another game where he was scum, making some setup comments, saying nothing about alignments.In post 586, Flubbernugget wrote:Dunn isn't a solid vote. He's not even someone you'd vote apparently
oh soIn post 615, RadiantCowbells wrote:Null: LUV
I was laughing at myself for fucking upIn post 616, Zulfy wrote:She's saying "solid vote on Dunn", why the "apparently"?In post 602, Flubbernugget wrote:It's even in the post of yours I quoted lmaooooIn post 595, Shoshin wrote:Dunn's at the top of my suspect list. He's playing exactly like he did in another game where he was scum, making some setup comments, saying nothing about alignments.In post 586, Flubbernugget wrote:Dunn isn't a solid vote. He's not even someone you'd vote apparently
No I dontIn post 614, Zulfy wrote:^ see what i mean?
It was a shit argument that's all.In post 622, RadiantCowbells wrote:i never got the impressino you actually understood my argument